Back to @funnyassjenise's profile

Funnyassjenise engagement report

@funnyassjenise - 1.1M followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.064%
of 1.1M followers
Per impression
0.716%
97K views on a typical post
Reach
8.97%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
695
interactions (median)
Saved
0.025%
24 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 695 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 97K times each, and 0.716% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 108x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Funnyassjenise's engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 42% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.064%, Funnyassjenise sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.081%
p750.439%
p902.10%
p99158.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 37,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 105,409 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.081%
75th percentile0.439%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile158.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%52K
01:00 UTC-2%53K
02:00 UTC-3%51K
03:00 UTC-4%55K
04:00 UTC-6%44K
05:00 UTC-4%43K
06:00 UTC-4%50K
07:00 UTC-5%54K
08:00 UTC-4%62K
09:00 UTC-3%72K
10:00 UTC-2%74K
11:00 UTC-3%81K
12:00 UTC-2%89K
13:00 UTC-2%98K
14:00 UTC-4%101K
15:00 UTC-2%104K
16:00 UTC-3%102K
17:00 UTC-3%94K
18:00 UTC-1%88K
19:00 UTC-2%83K
20:00 UTC-1%77K
21:00 UTC-1%68K
22:00 UTC-2%59K
23:00 UTC-2%53K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%237K
Monday0%300K
Tuesday-3%299K
Wednesday-1%256K
Thursday-1%249K
Friday-3%258K
Saturday+3%232K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Jul 8, 2026108x their median

    bunu çözersen, IQ seviyen ortalamanın üstündedir. Sünger bob'un kilosu nedir? https://t.co/E7LESrnprD

    28K72746K82511M viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202640x their median

    This was peak television 😂 https://t.co/bT6900mNX2

    23K4.5K1444033.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 202630x their median

    https://t.co/Hs5pzFP03f

    20K62021751872K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 202621x their median

    https://t.co/SUwN7Jp7No

    14K54613058600K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202619x their median

    Chicago tomorrow https://t.co/H1nROMhw9J

    12K40414633459K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202615x their median

    Finding out Onlyfans is owned by 🧃 turned me off.

    9.3K2523343062.4M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202615x their median

    https://t.co/2lTqK7oN5n

    9.6K33212626230K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202610x their median

    I just realized none of the “90’s fine women” are married.

    6.2K4382522792.1M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202610x their median

    Regardless of how good you look only a small percentage of women get rich off onlyfans…there are millions of women that exposed their bodies online and that shit ended up being a waste of time!

    6.0K781197176701K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20268.5x their median

    Thanks for having me @BARSONI95 https://t.co/U47Bg7xHms

    5.6K1974927485K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 695 interactions against 1.1M followers, an engagement rate of 0.064%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 65% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 97K times each, and 0.716% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 8.97% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 75K interactions, about 108x its own typical post.

What is Funnyassjenise's engagement rate on X?
Funnyassjenise (@funnyassjenise) has an engagement rate of 0.064%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,082,030 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.064%, Funnyassjenise sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @funnyassjenise have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 65% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @funnyassjenise post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going