PlayerSells
Back to @funkeractual's profile

FUNKER530 engagement report

@funkeractual - 99K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.555%
of 99K followers
Per impression
2.03%
27K views on a typical post
Reach
27.3%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
548
interactions (median)
Saved
0.156%
42 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.93/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
19:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 548 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.555%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

FUNKER530's engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 58% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.555%, FUNKER530 sits above the 75th percentile of the 12,168 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.346% to 2.43%.

p100.001%
p250.008%
p50 (median)0.052%
p750.346%
p902.43%
p99304.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 12,168 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 337,730 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.008%
50th percentile0.052%
75th percentile0.346%
90th percentile2.43%
99th percentile304.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest hour: 19:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%18K
01:00 UTC+1%18K
02:00 UTC-1%18K
03:00 UTC-4%18K
04:00 UTC-7%15K
05:00 UTC-6%14K
06:00 UTC-6%16K
07:00 UTC-6%17K
08:00 UTC-6%20K
09:00 UTC-3%23K
10:00 UTC-2%25K
11:00 UTC-2%26K
12:00 UTC0%29K
13:00 UTC0%33K
14:00 UTC-2%34K
15:00 UTC-1%36K
16:00 UTC-1%35K
17:00 UTC-1%33K
18:00 UTC+1%30K
19:00 UTC+1%28K
20:00 UTC-1%26K
21:00 UTC+1%23K
22:00 UTC+1%20K
23:00 UTC0%18K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%85K
Monday+2%88K
Tuesday+1%102K
Wednesday-3%87K
Thursday-1%82K
Friday-4%89K
Saturday+4%83K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video96% of posts+83%+77% to +89%7.0K
Outbound link83% of posts-48%-50% to -47%7.2K
Typical length--5%-7% to -4%11K
  • 96% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 83% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 48% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 178 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 5% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 31, 202633x their median

    Google has announced that it is suspending the rollout of its AI image generation feature in Google Earth after major backlash from experts on potential abuse. https://t.co/hKwedadgeG

    16K1.0K1731901.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202613x their median

    Colombian commandos extract while under fire from narco-terrorists. Pretty sweet. See more at https://t.co/Srjnof9D2o https://t.co/CNdlmmi39T

    6.5K5136046300K viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20266.8x their median

    Modern warfare. https://t.co/Q55tIHm6n8

    3.3K2367876437K viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 20264.3x their median

    Drones hiding underwater now. https://t.co/QxxQ0HFDEh

    2.2K1035233160K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.0x their median

    GoPro footage circulating in Russian spaces online today shows a squad of logistics troops engaging with a Ukrainian FPV drone. See more at https://t.co/U0Ae0wqvjW https://t.co/GdGIwGKA8E

    2.0K1142910146K viewsView on X
  • Aug 3, 20263.8x their median

    Just walk it off https://t.co/0lnuQqIRjs

    1.9K541051571K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20263.5x their median

    Insane. 144 passports recovered from Russian KIA during clearing operations. See more https://t.co/Srjnof9D2o https://t.co/HGq098vMnX

    1.8K62203134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.0x their median

    Reconnaissance drone footage released by the Pakistani military captures the moment a pair of Taliban fighters on a motorcycle drive right into an ambush. Footage from August 11th. See more at https://t.co/U0Ae0wqvjW https://t.co/y58zrJ1HV7

    1.1K3414273K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20261.9x their median

    Oof. A Turkish F-16 was recorded attempting to make an extremely low altitude fly-by maneuver when it crashed into a treeline. See more at https://t.co/U0Ae0wqvjW https://t.co/edn4hRAAay

    92928501074K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20261.6x their median

    Gang-related shootout in South Sacramento. Absolute nonsense. See more at https://t.co/Srjnof9D2o https://t.co/O13YgUzExM

    7604140271.0M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 548 interactions against 99K followers, an engagement rate of 0.555%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 73% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 27K times each, and 2.03% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.3% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.93 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 96% carry an image or video and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 18K interactions, about 33x its own typical post.

What is FUNKER530's engagement rate on X?
FUNKER530 (@funkeractual) has an engagement rate of 0.555%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 98,901 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.555%, FUNKER530 sits above the 75th percentile of the 12,168 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @funkeractual have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 73% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @funkeractual post?
Most posts go out around 19:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.93 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going

FUNKER530 (@funkeractual) Engagement Rate - 0.555% | PlayerSells