Back to @fteconomics's profile

FT Economics engagement report

@fteconomics - 480K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.002%
of 480K followers
Per impression
0.128%
6.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
8
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 20% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 480K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 0.128% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 28, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

FT Economics's engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.002%, FT Economics sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.434%
p902.10%
p99160.7%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,521 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 107,166 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.434%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.7%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%50K
01:00 UTC-2%51K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%60K
09:00 UTC-3%69K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%100K
16:00 UTC-3%97K
17:00 UTC-2%90K
18:00 UTC-1%84K
19:00 UTC-2%79K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-2%57K
23:00 UTC-2%51K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%230K
Monday0%286K
Tuesday-2%276K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%244K
Friday-3%252K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 27, 20267.0x their median

    De-dollarisation may not be over https://t.co/D7SN1pUTWz

    35134427K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20264.0x their median

    China warns US it could retaliate over Iran sanctions https://t.co/wJyccqzQyY

    2010119.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20263.8x their median

    High asset prices, not low interest rates, are driving inflation https://t.co/wVq4dVtwd3

    188229.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20263.8x their median

    FirstFT: Kevin Warsh seeks to calm investors’ nerves as signs of economic strain grow https://t.co/xAN7aIOvbT

    2171110K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20263.5x their median

    ‘We got attacked’: Canadians unite in fury against Trump’s latest tariff salvo https://t.co/HcztVqREQI

    175606.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20262.9x their median

    Korea extends tightening cycle with rate rise to 3% https://t.co/OTis7Q32X0

    2012010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.5x their median

    How worried should the bond market be about US inflation? https://t.co/0pgayMvJim

    1721010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.4x their median

    US grain farmers pummelled as Iran war triggers surge in costs https://t.co/9nH8I3zl1z

    127006.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.1x their median

    Scott Bessent threatens wider US sanctions on Iran’s economic partners https://t.co/EPfgB33P3h

    124107.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 26, 20262.0x their median

    Bessent’s bond intervention puts US Treasury on collision course with Fed https://t.co/fHqXhtrXQE

    131115.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 8 interactions against 480K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 13% of 3,774 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 6.6K times each, and 0.128% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 20% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 56 interactions, about 7.0x its own typical post.

What is FT Economics's engagement rate on X?
FT Economics (@fteconomics) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 479,527 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.002%, FT Economics sits above the 10th percentile of the 36,521 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fteconomics have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 13% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,774 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fteconomics post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going