Back to @ftcarpe's profile

carpe engagement report

@ftcarpe - 273K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.039%
of 273K followers
Per impression
0.617%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
6.27%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
106
interactions (median)
Saved
0.135%
23 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.83/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.617% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 21% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

carpe's engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.039%, carpe sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.022% to 0.128%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.128%
p750.604%
p902.32%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 157,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,055 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.128%
75th percentile0.604%
90th percentile2.32%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video79% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link21% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 79% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 21% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 234 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 18, 202628x their median

    este chico está sacando +$100k/mes con su propio agente de IA trabajando de forma autónoma. explica cómo hacerlo en 10 minutos con Claude Code + Obsidian, guárdalo para más tarde y míralo con calma. https://t.co/zGd2X0Ma6I

    2.6K329603201K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20266.7x their median

    vi a un chaval de 20 años explicar cómo saca 10k$ al mes mientras duerme y el 99% de la gente se está perdiendo esto. que es lo que tienes que hacer??? eliges un canal de YouTube que publique seguido. metes el link en una herramienta. conectas tu TikTok, IG, Shorts. cierras el portátil. a partir de ahí, la IA hace el resto. Detecta cada subida nueva, corta los momentos virales, los subtitula, los publica en todas partes. 1M de views son unos 2.000$. sin editar. sin publicar tú. 10 minutos de setup y corre solo para siempre. el paso a paso completo está en el artículo de abajo. guárdalo, no lo dejes pasar 🔖

    59210113348K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20265.2x their median

    JUST IN: Anthropic reportedly considering new AI model to counter OpenAI's GPT-6 Astra

    47421421964K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.9x their median

    en menos de 15 minutos este chico te explica como está ganando +$90K/mes utilizando Claude Code + Youtube guarda este vídeo para más tarde, no lo dejes pasar 🔖 https://t.co/ijCqxQhTZJ

    4476112159K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20264.3x their median

    https://t.co/TZsWr3BaDz

    38140327201K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    used to brainstorm in Claude, copy the notes somewhere else, rebuild the deck by hand, repeat. now the deck builds itself before I finish the thought. first, connect Gamma with Claude: Settings → Connectors → Gamma (use the same email you use in Claude). https://t.co/zRexxTfjok

    14555021K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    Apply to Wefunder's Best of America to receive up to $5M. We have facilitated over $1B into 4000+ companies. Now we’re hitting the road to fund the best founders across the country. 3 months. 12 cities. 36 startups. Application deadline - Oct 5: https://t.co/1LGHiXKDhh https://t.co/p4N079x2JR

    7220251937K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    alguien montó un proxy que conecta la CLI de Claude Code a 10 proveedores gratuitos, como DeepSeek y Kimi. lo instalas y sigues trabajando igual, sin la factura mensual, más de 20.000 devs ya lo están usando. guárdalo, no lo dejes pasar 🔖 https://t.co/LIPd6Tk1YO

    5412903.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 2026

    instalé una skill en Claude que reescribe cualquier texto generado con IA para que suene más humanizado. → su nombre es Humanizer, respeta el código y los datos, lo único que hace es modificar la prosa. una herramienta 100% GRATIS que solo tienes que descargar en GitHub e instalar la skill en Claude, dejo el link aquí abajo 🔗 https://t.co/6gwfmzMYmN guárdalo para instalarlo más tarde 🔖

    5491007.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 2026

    SpaceXAI senior engineer just dropped a 1 hour workshop on building a team of GrokBot agents to automate 100% of your daily tasks. > 05:32 - how to build a GrokBot agent. > 13:01 - skill implementation for GrokBot. > 33:46 - GrokBot agent architecture. > 55:17 - loops and agentic workflows. definitely worth the watch, save it for later 🙇🏻‍♂️

    378916.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 106 interactions against 273K followers, an engagement rate of 0.039%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 44% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 0.617% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.26% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 79% carry an image or video, 21% are part of a thread and 21% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.0K interactions, about 28x its own typical post.

What is carpe's engagement rate on X?
carpe (@ftcarpe) has an engagement rate of 0.039%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 272,845 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.039%, carpe sits above the 25th percentile of the 157,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ftcarpe have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 44% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ftcarpe post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going