PlayerSells
Back to @foreplay's profile

mars engagement report

@foreplay - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.751%
43K views on a typical post
Reach
3.32%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
324
interactions (median)
Saved
0.023%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 324 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.751% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 239x its own typical post.

Measured over 35 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

mars's engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 45% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, mars sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.006% to 0.046%.

p100.001%
p250.006%
p50 (median)0.046%
p750.318%
p902.67%
p99366.2%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 9,668 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 457,772 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.006%
50th percentile0.046%
75th percentile0.318%
90th percentile2.67%
99th percentile366.2%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%14K
01:00 UTC+3%15K
02:00 UTC-1%14K
03:00 UTC-2%15K
04:00 UTC-5%12K
05:00 UTC-4%12K
06:00 UTC-7%13K
07:00 UTC-6%14K
08:00 UTC-7%16K
09:00 UTC-2%19K
10:00 UTC-2%20K
11:00 UTC-2%22K
12:00 UTC-1%24K
13:00 UTC+1%27K
14:00 UTC-2%28K
15:00 UTC-1%30K
16:00 UTC-1%29K
17:00 UTC-1%28K
18:00 UTC+1%25K
19:00 UTC0%23K
20:00 UTC0%21K
21:00 UTC+1%19K
22:00 UTC+1%16K
23:00 UTC+1%15K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 97%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+9%56K
Monday+8%72K
Tuesday+1%93K
Wednesday-4%77K
Thursday-3%70K
Friday-6%71K
Saturday+2%62K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video26% of posts+79%+73% to +84%5.7K
Outbound link3% of posts-49%-50% to -47%6.0K
Typical length-+7%+4% to +10%7.0K
  • 26% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 79% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 3% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 49% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 44 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 7% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026239x their median

    The cia has yet to find a torture method that doesn’t make me cum

    72K5.1K1002231.1M viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202662x their median

    17 people have to die in order for me to smile again

    16K4.1K352311.2M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202647x their median

    https://t.co/cBgt930sNa

    14K1.3K1882270K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202629x their median

    i hope everyone is doing okay forever , i hope everyone is working on their passion projects , i hope everyone is having fun

    7.1K2.2K193491K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202629x their median

    tummy thursday 😉 https://t.co/GqDeAWvmEZ

    9.1K237212113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 202625x their median

    Tummy :P https://t.co/ZES8rXCpiL

    7.6K178175290K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202622x their median

    mona https://t.co/muJmwjOqe3

    6.8K4564352K viewsView on X
  • Aug 18, 202620x their median

    Having a girl miles out of ur league and treating her like shit >>

    6.2K2753736172K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202618x their median

    Ronova doodle:3 I love her hair https://t.co/LI7exuha3V

    5.2K68516331K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202617x their median

    キラキラです https://t.co/phQuryaJCP

    5.3K2764153K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 324 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 35 original posts, its engagement rate beats 53% of 983 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 43K times each, and 0.751% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 35 posts sampled, 26% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 78K interactions, about 239x its own typical post.

What is mars's engagement rate on X?
mars (@foreplay) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 35 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,299,338 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, mars sits above the 25th percentile of the 9,668 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @foreplay have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 53% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (983 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @foreplay post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going