PlayerSells
Back to @fofoquei's profile

FOFOQUEI engagement report

@fofoquei - 1.3M followers on X

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.008%
of 1.3M followers
Per impression
0.967%
10K views on a typical post
Reach
0.8%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
98
interactions (median)
Saved
0.059%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.2/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 1,223 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.967% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.805% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.0K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #dançadosfamosos.

Compared with accounts its own size

FOFOQUEI's engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,223 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, FOFOQUEI sits above the 10th percentile of the 14,083 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.008%.

p100.001%
p250.008%
p50 (median)0.055%
p750.357%
p902.37%
p99261.9%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 14,083 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 261,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.008%
50th percentile0.055%
75th percentile0.357%
90th percentile2.37%
99th percentile261.9%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%18K
01:00 UTC+1%18K
02:00 UTC-1%18K
03:00 UTC-4%18K
04:00 UTC-7%15K
05:00 UTC-6%14K
06:00 UTC-6%16K
07:00 UTC-6%17K
08:00 UTC-6%20K
09:00 UTC-3%23K
10:00 UTC-2%25K
11:00 UTC-2%26K
12:00 UTC0%29K
13:00 UTC0%33K
14:00 UTC-2%34K
15:00 UTC-1%36K
16:00 UTC-1%35K
17:00 UTC-1%33K
18:00 UTC+1%30K
19:00 UTC+1%28K
20:00 UTC-1%26K
21:00 UTC+1%23K
22:00 UTC+1%20K
23:00 UTC0%18K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%85K
Monday+2%88K
Tuesday+1%102K
Wednesday-3%87K
Thursday-1%82K
Friday-4%89K
Saturday+4%83K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+83%+77% to +89%7.0K
Outbound link0% of posts-48%-50% to -47%7.2K
Typical length--5%-7% to -4%11K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 83% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 48% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 157 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 5% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202661x their median

    Influenciadora relata péssima experiência em ter que raspar parte da cabeça para exame toxicológico da CNH. https://t.co/dsGhAwCdNe

    5.1K1102285404.3M viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202642x their median

    🇧🇷 BRASIL: Luccas Abreu é perseguido e intimidado por segurança dentro de loja: “Não é a primeira vez. Eu sempre relevo, mas dessa vez não deu” https://t.co/5HkLMz9VRw

    3.9K166486197K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202622x their median

    Um absurdo! O caso de Emiliane Tamara, que teria ficado acorrentada e em cárcere privado pelo ex-marido, causa indignação. Que a Justiça seja feita e que nenhuma mulher precise passar por uma situação tão cruel novamente. https://t.co/A9C6mGoQ4x

    2.0K114301149K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202618x their median

    Influencer aclama Bruna Marquezine por ir à Angola oferecer ajuda, mas não sensacionalizar nem explorar a imagem de pessoas em possível vulnerabilidade. https://t.co/wHzeSBxEK6

    1.7K1306133K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202612x their median

    🇧🇷BRASIL: Jovens percebem início de incêndio em carreta e impedem o pior https://t.co/PEJ6J1Xd3G

    1.1K295187K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20269.2x their median

    🎥TV & CINEMA: Conheça o filme que surpreendentemente ganhou bilheterias e bateu de frente com a IA https://t.co/rTgGdYZRKG

    805824816K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 20268.9x their median

    Luana Piovani discute com vizinha em Portugal por cachorro andar sem guia. https://t.co/xzGBlxICse

    8172629530K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20266.5x their median

    Samara Felippo conta que estava de DIU quando engravidou do segundo filho. https://t.co/vVwGNsz0y1

    62764019K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20264.9x their median

    Shawn Mendes e Bruna Marquezine passeando pelo Rio de Janeiro neste domingo (23). https://t.co/O86W2c9D1I

    465120419K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20264.8x their median

    ⭐️FAMOSOS: Vera Fisher dá conselhos sobre o medo de envelhecer. https://t.co/aasDlXri37

    4054717419K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dançadosfamosos

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 98 interactions against 1.3M followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 35% of 1,223 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 10K times each, and 0.967% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.805% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.0K interactions, about 61x its own typical post.

What is FOFOQUEI's engagement rate on X?
FOFOQUEI (@fofoquei) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,252,606 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, FOFOQUEI sits above the 10th percentile of the 14,083 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fofoquei have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 35% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,223 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fofoquei post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going