Back to @fluxrbot's profile

FluxrBot engagement report

@fluxrbot - 171K followers on X

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 171K followers
Per impression
0.168%
595 views on a typical post
Reach
0.35%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.7/day
active 10% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 595 times each, and 0.168% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.348% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video, 73% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3M interactions, about 1291705x its own typical post.

Measured over 11 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

FluxrBot's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 10% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, FluxrBot sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,798 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,879 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video91% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link18% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 91% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 18% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 257 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Dec 7, 20241291705x their median

    https://t.co/eYTt40ahVq

    1.2M77K20K7.4K157M viewsView on X
  • Dec 14, 202410691x their median

    When you never set out to be a political account but every single thing you like became political. https://t.co/D4AwptzDbF

    8.6K1.1K76028929M viewsView on X
  • Dec 21, 2024279x their median

    we’re at the ATH for daily usage on the @helium mobile network number appears to be up only, and so many good things coming in 2025 🫡 https://t.co/9vkDwY8WXG

    221351211205K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20262.0x their median

    18 months in prison for digging up a church floor. €120,000 in damage to a 12th-century building. He was looking in the wrong place anyway. Full breakdown in the first reply. https://t.co/kXeGSc8fSW

    1010549 viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    A French court sentenced a man to 18 months in prison for digging up a church floor without a permit, causing €120,000 in damage. He was searching for a 17th-century musketeer's grave. Experts testified his archival evidence pointed to a different site entirely. Full breakdown in

    0010370 viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    Catania Airport shut down after Mount Etna sent volcanic ash into the airspace. Europe's most active volcano halted all flights at one of Italy's busiest airports. https://t.co/IQksh5EkXH

    0010924 viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    US officials flew a diplomat accused of possessing indecent images of children out of Britain in August without warning police or filing extradition papers https://t.co/fcVXrFUKLk

    0010502 viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 2026

    129 people missing after passenger ship capsizes in Java Sea. Indonesia has recorded dozens of fatal ferry sinkings over the past two decades. https://t.co/HYA18grXKm

    0010702 viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026

    38 outlets ran it. Not one published a reason. Iraq ordered the Shalamcheh crossing with Iran shut, Reuters says, citing 2 sources. No end date either. In a story this thin, the gaps are the tradable information. Full breakdown in the first reply. https://t.co/elgbV0BxBu

    0010663 viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 2026

    Reform UK: a second £36m donation in 48 hours, per Reuters. Gifts above £7,500 must go to the Electoral Commission — but the register updates quarterly, not live. Spending caps mean cash buys staff and offices, not ads. Full breakdown in the first reply.

    0010600 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 171K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 11 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 595 times each, and 0.168% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.348% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.7 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 10% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 11 posts sampled, 91% carry an image or video, 73% are part of a thread and 18% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3M interactions, about 1291705x its own typical post.

What is FluxrBot's engagement rate on X?
FluxrBot (@fluxrbot) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 11 original posts from the last 30 days against 170,895 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, FluxrBot sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,798 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fluxrbot have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fluxrbot post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.7 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going