Back to @fineassmarie6's profile

niecy ass πŸ’ engagement report

@fineassmarie6 - 145K followers on X

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.012%
of 145K followers
Per impression
0.332%
5.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
16
interactions (median)
Saved
0.02%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.3/day
active 27% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.332% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 881x its own typical post.

Measured over 36 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 27, 2026. Recurring tag: #jezebel.

Compared with accounts its own size

niecy ass πŸ’'s engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 18% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.012%, niecy ass πŸ’ sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,555 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 50 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 21, 2026881x their median

    If your man under 180 I promise he safe. Nobody wants a remote https://t.co/1GRN7gy2dP

    12K1.4K211695729K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026618x their median

    She is EVERYTHING and More 😍 Beyoncé and Mama Tina are so beautiful 🀍🀍 https://t.co/Xl4SFdielU

    8.9K8912392302K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026485x their median

    πŸ€— https://t.co/y2Hh5PG2Rj

    7.4K2671101169K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026429x their median

    REMY MA DEBUTS HER NEW #JEZEBEL CHAIN & GOES OFF ON PAPOOSE IN A FREESTYLE OFF HER NEW ALBUM β€œTHEY AIN’T SEND NO ZELLE, I PAID ALL THE RENT… I PUT UP HALF THIS ISH” πŸ‘€ https://t.co/h6f1KF2Fj4

    3.5K3961.6K1.4K1.3M viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 2026427x their median

    oh we have LOST the plot https://t.co/hJETycyq00

    6.0K58972164110K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026300x their median

    I just.. love meπŸ₯Ήβ€¦ https://t.co/2GoXTfPgrv

    4.7K902413129K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026204x their median

    Usher stooped so low for touring with that boy.

    2.7K31982144222K viewsView on X
  • Sep 22, 202649x their median

    PETE ALONSO IS KEEPING THE ORIOLES SEASON ALIVE His second HR tonight and #40 on the season gives Baltimore the lead in the 8th! https://t.co/r9UCNGCcj9

    7422471588K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20266.5x their median

    What’s a bill that pisses you off every single month?

    170365118K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20264.9x their median

    https://t.co/G5k7o48CqH

    501511215K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#jezebel

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 16 interactions against 145K followers, an engagement rate of 0.012%. Measured over 36 original posts, its engagement rate beats 22% of 19,933 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 5.0K times each, and 0.332% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.42% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 27% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 36 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 881x its own typical post.

What is niecy ass πŸ’'s engagement rate on X?
niecy ass πŸ’ (@fineassmarie6) has an engagement rate of 0.012%, based on the median interactions across 36 original posts from the last 30 days against 145,099 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.012%, niecy ass πŸ’ sits above the 10th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fineassmarie6 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 22% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,933 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fineassmarie6 post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.3 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going