PlayerSells
Back to @film_girl's profile

Christina Warren engagement report

@film_girl - 98K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
1.84%
of 98K followers
Per impression
0.975%
186K views on a typical post
Reach
188.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.8K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.092%
170 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.43/day
active 63% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 98K followers, an engagement rate of 1.84%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 186K times each, and 0.975% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 188.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 22, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Christina Warren's engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 4 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 1.84%, Christina Warren sits above the 75th percentile of the 12,168 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.346% to 2.43%.

p100.001%
p250.008%
p50 (median)0.052%
p750.346%
p902.43%
p99304.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 12,168 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 337,730 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.001%
25th percentile0.008%
50th percentile0.052%
75th percentile0.346%
90th percentile2.43%
99th percentile304.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC0%18K
01:00 UTC+1%18K
02:00 UTC-1%18K
03:00 UTC-4%18K
04:00 UTC-7%15K
05:00 UTC-6%14K
06:00 UTC-6%16K
07:00 UTC-6%17K
08:00 UTC-6%20K
09:00 UTC-3%23K
10:00 UTC-2%25K
11:00 UTC-2%26K
12:00 UTC0%29K
13:00 UTC0%33K
14:00 UTC-2%34K
15:00 UTC-1%36K
16:00 UTC-1%35K
17:00 UTC-1%33K
18:00 UTC+1%30K
19:00 UTC+1%28K
20:00 UTC-1%26K
21:00 UTC+1%23K
22:00 UTC+1%20K
23:00 UTC0%18K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 94%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%85K
Monday+2%88K
Tuesday+1%102K
Wednesday-3%87K
Thursday-1%82K
Friday-4%89K
Saturday+4%83K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video67% of posts+83%+77% to +89%7.0K
Outbound link29% of posts-48%-50% to -47%7.2K
Typical length-+12%+10% to +15%7.5K
  • 67% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 83% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 48% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 378 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 12% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 5, 202621x their median

    Tomorrow will be my last day at Google after 27 years, and watching it grow from 25 people to 190,000+ has been an amazing journey. Below is a note I shared with many people internally at Google today. An excerpt is: It has been an absolute pleasure to work with you and to help build some of the most widely used and impactful products of all time. As a kid, I dreamed of helping build software that would be used by many people, and Google now has thirteen products used by more than a billion people (amazing!). Our work has had a tremendous impact in the world, and I have been lucky enough to collaborate and form friendships with many colleagues that I deeply admire, respect, and enjoy. It still brings me joy every time I see people out in the world using our products to find information, handle email, translate documents, watch videos, learn new things, navigate and understand the physical world, browse the web, use their phone, run large-scale computations on our infrastructure, ride in an autonomous vehicle, or perform complex tasks with the help of our AI systems. I hope you all share this sense of joy, because it is a shared accomplishment! Thank you to all of my colleagues at Google over many years! Now I'm excited to go start @DiscoLoopAI with my longtime friends and colleagues @Sanjay_Ghemawat, @OriolVinyalsML, and @quocleix. (Updated post: slightly redacted to not have some personal info)

    34K2.8K85075812M viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20269.9x their median

    Oddly enough the best advertisement I've seen for OLED TVs lol

    17K8163971.5M viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20266.4x their median

    Jean Smart and Hannah Einbinder will reprise Deborah Vance and Ava at a live comedy show at Hollywood's Fonda Theatre. This is the first time Smart and Einbinder have appeared in-character outside of the Emmy-winning HBO Max comedy. The live special is timed to the start of Emmy Phase 2 voting. https://t.co/nDtFS1MRo3

    11K49931515624K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20263.4x their median

    Matthew Rhys and Keri Russell cover the latest issue of Variety 📸: Gavin Bond https://t.co/Nd1f1Y77Xu

    5.4K394443622.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20263.2x their median

    Salary cap? Uh, have you considered acquiring multiple insurance companies and using the policy payments of little old ladies to fund your teams sports bets?

    5.5K27914191K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20263.0x their median

    Qwen3.8-27B is here! 🚀 It's a leap in capabilities for a laptop size model. Requires ~17GB to run locally. Model page: https://t.co/GOxQEOLrdK https://t.co/g06nqgOXdB

    4.8K404128115681K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20262.4x their median

    Jeff Skilling announces that he is resigning as CEO of Enron. Observers note that Skilling has sold 450,000 shares of Enron in the past nine months. https://t.co/bMVfGJK7rj

    4.1K11810827199K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 20261.8x their median

    New White Collar themed logo™️ bout to drop! https://t.co/oW4pb6Cvop

    3.1K1993022121K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 2026

    Supreme x Analogue Pocket announced https://t.co/aB2wFISQQe https://t.co/WrRfW8LJGb

    2.3K7811997350K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 2026

    Sharing some more UI previews for Superlogical, this time the "tab peek." If you three-finger swipe down, you can "peek" at the other session tabs. These are live-updating, metal-rendered previews including splits. If you keep dragging, you enter a "mission control" style mode. This is one of those UI patterns that once you get used to, you mindlessly find yourself doing it ALL THE TIME. It's a great way to quickly take a look at everything thats going on. You aren't reading the mini text of course, but the shape of it tells you a lot about where things are. The peek pushes the terminal down off screen, it doesn't resize it, so it doesn't force any weird reflow or anything either. There's a lot more to talk about, especially about how this interacts with how we expose what needs attention so you can easily find the terminals/sessions/etc. that require your attention. Of course, you'll be able to drive this with the keyboard too. :) As always, a disclaimer: this is all early work subject to change, just trying to share some of what we're building in public. A lot of the UI experiential design is @almonk so follow him for more updates too!

    2.2K7214130346K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.8K interactions against 98K followers, an engagement rate of 1.84%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 88% of 1,224 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 186K times each, and 0.975% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 188.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 67% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 38K interactions, about 21x its own typical post.

What is Christina Warren's engagement rate on X?
Christina Warren (@film_girl) has an engagement rate of 1.84%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 98,366 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 1.84%, Christina Warren sits above the 75th percentile of the 12,168 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @film_girl have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 88% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (1,224 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @film_girl post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going