Back to @filipebarrost's profile

Filipe Barros engagement report

@filipebarrost - 1.0M followers on X

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.303%
of 1.0M followers
Per impression
17.5%
18K views on a typical post
Reach
1.73%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
3.1K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.062%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.57/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Saturday

A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.303%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 17.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post.

Measured over 66 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Filipe Barros's engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 100% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.303%, Filipe Barros sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.677%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Saturday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Saturday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video85% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 186 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • May 5, 20267.2x their median

    O Pilili fica melhor com essa franja, vocês não acham? https://t.co/wI6s2cTNEi

    21K5.4K1.2K298137K viewsView on X
  • May 17, 20265.3x their median

    Visitei Filipe Martins, um dos presos políticos mais injustiçados pela atual situação judiciária do Brasil. É realmente triste ver de que forma desumana este amigo vem sendo tratado. O Filipe trabalhou no Governo Bolsonaro para defender a nossa liberdade e merece todo o nosso trabalho para defender a liberdade dele.

    15K4.6K53410784K viewsView on X
  • May 30, 20264.9x their median

    Mandei a real pra jornalista na coletiva com @FlavioBolsonaro https://t.co/6bV7W1W7gf

    14K4.2K364107103K viewsView on X
  • Oct 24, 20265.9x their median

    Lula: Quanto é 2+2? Flávio: 4. Lula: É inacreditável sua incapacidade de responder as coisas com objetividade.

    17K1.4K7828202K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20265.8x their median

    Não vai ter anistia, nem blindagem, nem negociação nenhuma! O povo já julgou o STF, e nós, senadores, executaremos a sentença! https://t.co/DZfDvAf5J8

    14K3.5K3097363K viewsView on X
  • Sep 12, 20264.8x their median

    Parabenizo Gleisi Hoffmann pela postura no debate de hoje. Foi a primeira vez que ela completou um debate comigo sem falar nenhuma bobagem. A estratégia foi infalível: não apareceu.

    13K1.6K831957K viewsView on X
  • Apr 5, 20252.5x their median

    Agradeço de coração ao presidente @jairbolsonaro pela confiança em me indicar como seu pré-candidato ao Senado pelo Paraná. É uma missão que carrego com orgulho e responsabilidade. Vou honrar cada paranaense, representando muito bem o nosso estado e os valores que nos definem. https://t.co/sqFF9nlGqV

    11K2.8K69575225K viewsView on X
  • Oct 13, 20264.6x their median

    É hoje! Grande encontro da vitória de Flavio Bolsonaro presidente! O Paraná já venceu. E o Brasil vai vencer! https://t.co/bVbtzZ07vb

    11K2.8K7475990K viewsView on X
  • Oct 19, 20264.2x their median

    A melhor frase de Flávio contra Lula: "A sua aposentadoria será respeitada no meu governo!"

    11K1.3K37241K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.0x their median

    Filipe Martins não apenas deve ser imediatamente solto, como indenizado por cada dia que passou preso injustamente. Está na hora de trocar o Filipe de lugar com quem se utilizou de um documento falso para fazer perseguição política no Brasil. https://t.co/8Gc8CLYfVY

    9.8K2.5K1414550K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 3.1K interactions against 1.0M followers, an engagement rate of 0.303%. Measured over 66 original posts, its engagement rate beats 87% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 18K times each, and 17.5% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.73% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 66 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 27K interactions, about 7.2x its own typical post.

What is Filipe Barros's engagement rate on X?
Filipe Barros (@filipebarrost) has an engagement rate of 0.303%, based on the median interactions across 66 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,023,115 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.303%, Filipe Barros sits above the 50th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @filipebarrost have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 87% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @filipebarrost post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Saturday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.57 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going