Figma engagement report
@figma - 579K followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 607 interactions against 579K followers, an engagement rate of 0.105%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
Figma's engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 50% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.105%, Figma sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.677% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 85% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 15% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 85% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 231 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 8, 20265.8x their median
It’s over. I’m quitting design. A client of mine just created a logo with Fable 5, and the result left me speechless. It understood the brand story, values, audience, strategy, and turned all of it into a smart, minimal symbol. A genuinely brilliant concept. The kind of idea that captures everything at once. Something I honestly don’t think I would have come up with myself. And it didn’t just nail the idea. It executed the design pixel-perfectly. So I raise the white flag. My skepticism about AI’s ability to do great design is officially gone. There, I said it: AI beat me at design. Now that AI finally took my job, I can peacefully quit and dedicate my life to studying the only thing it may never achieve: human consciousness and the pathways to God. Good luck everyone.
- Aug 3, 20267.3x their median
🗂️ Projects └🗂️ Are now └🗂️ Folders └🗂️ (We won) └🗂️ Rolling out over the next few weeks https://t.co/Pls77ivb6m
- Aug 24, 20266.2x their median
Introducing Source Material — the weekly series where the designers & creatives shaping culture share the references that shaped them. Our first guest is Thom Bettridge: Editor-in-Chief of @i_D and founder of Content World. 00:00 - Introducing Source Material 00:08 Joe's Magazine (First Issue) 00:49 Colors: A Book about a Magazine About the Rest of the World 01:27 Balenciaga Archetype magazine 02:00 032c 33 (Frank Ocean Cover) 02:28 All-In Nº9 03:32 Highstyle (Migos Cover) 04:23 i-D 374 (“The Unknown Issue” Enza Khoury Cover) 05:42 i-D 375 (“The Beta Issue” Born In 2025 Cover) 06:50 Outro
- Aug 31, 20265.2x their median
This week’s episode of Source Material spotlights @meshtimes_ — where one of the internet’s favorite creative technologists shares how her world of code, creativity, and playfulness all collide. 00:00 Intro 00:09 Vanity Washable Makeup Kit 01:21 Cyberfeminism Index (Mindy Seu, 2023) 02:00 Pinto Lunch Box 02:43 Tree of Codes (Jonathan Safran Foer, 2010) 03:10 Custom Makeup Cyberdeck 04:40 How to Wrap 5 Eggs (Hideyuki Oka, 1967) 05:17 Pencil Case 05:45 The Last Lecture (Randy Pausch, 2008) 06:35 Tear-off Calendar 07:07 Outro
- Sep 9, 20265.2x their median
Here we go https://t.co/V8cDsgD4Ii
- Sep 29, 20264.3x their median
Dev Mode, now in Codex. Available in the Figma plugin. https://t.co/opHvrMftNZ
- Aug 13, 20264.2x their median
Turned 14 years old today https://t.co/jVgbrfP2Mk
- Sep 21, 20263.9x their median
This week on Source Material: enter the mind of Brent David Freaney — art director & founder of Special Offer. 00:00 Intro 00:36 Interaction of Color (Josef Albers, 1963) 01:19 A Dictionary of Color Combinations (Sanzo Wada, 2010) 01:54 Death of the Finished State (Brent David Freaney, Figma Config 2026) 02:20 Boarding Pass (Emirates, 2025) 03:41 M2 (Takashi Homma, 2011) 04:49 Room Service Menu (Century Hyatt Tokyo, 1980s) 05:59 The Visual Display of Quantitative Information (Edward Tufte, 1983) 06:58 The Oppression and Liberation: Or: Homophobia: Its Causes and Cure (Gay Theory Work Group, 1977) 08:12 Is Love Enough? (Bruce Weber, 2005)
- Sep 3, 20263.7x their median
https://t.co/71dtnJ9g4r
- Sep 12, 20263.3x their median
Finals.svg https://t.co/MW3z6K0kJc
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 607 interactions against 579K followers, an engagement rate of 0.105%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 72% of 20,182 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 56K times each, and 1.09% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.58% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 85% carry an image or video, 50% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.0K interactions, about 5.8x its own typical post.
- What is Figma's engagement rate on X?
- Figma (@figma) has an engagement rate of 0.105%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 579,178 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.105%, Figma sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,424 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @figma have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 72% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,182 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @figma post?
- Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.57 posts per day across the measured window.