Back to @fifacom_ar's profile

FIFA - عربي engagement report

@fifacom_ar - 4.6M followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 4.6M followers
Per impression
0.067%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
0.36%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
11
interactions (median)
Saved
0.003%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.67/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 4.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.067% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.362% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 5790x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #u17wwc, #u20wwc.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #u17wwc, #u20wwc.

Compared with accounts its own size

FIFA - عربي's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 4% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, FIFA - عربي sits below the 10th percentile of the 155,670 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.022%.

p100.003%
p250.022%
p50 (median)0.127%
p750.603%
p902.31%
p9983.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 155,670 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 26,055 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.003%
25th percentile0.022%
50th percentile0.127%
75th percentile0.603%
90th percentile2.31%
99th percentile83.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link44% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 148 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 19, 20265790x their median

    The Netherlands are the winners of the FIFA Fair Play Award presented by @mcdonalds 🤝🏆 https://t.co/n1XirS0q9m

    57K4.6K8321.2K3.0M viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 20263654x their median

    The future is now 🌟 Pau Cubarsí wins the FIFA Young Player Award presented by @aramco #FIFAWorldCup #YoungPlayerAward https://t.co/d7PYnm3TVJ

    32K6.9K498623812K viewsView on X
  • Jul 20, 2026217x their median

    من بين 145 حارسًا في كأس العالم 🌍🧤 مصطفى شوبير في المركز الثامن في تقييم حراس كأس العالم بحسب الموقع الرسمي لفيفا 🔝 بتقييمٍ يعادل تقييم أوناي سيمون بطل العالم وأفضل حارس في البطولة. 👏🇪🇬 https://t.co/eJ3ynt4jQD

    2.2K15101248K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 202694x their median

    كــــأس الـــعــالــــم ينادي 🌍🤩 𝘾𝙊𝙋𝘼 𝘿𝙀𝙇 𝙈𝙐𝙉𝘿𝙊 is calling.. 📞🇧🇷 #DimaMaghrib 🇲🇦 https://t.co/79cdo9BzoJ

    936868740K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 202657x their median

    محاربات الصحراء إلى المونديـــال لأول مرة في تاريخ سيدات الخضر 🎉🇩🇿💚 QUALIFIED FOR THE FIFA WOMEN’S WORLD CUP 2027 #LesVertes | #123VivaLAlgérie 🇩🇿 https://t.co/2fddhnxdUg

    52966201220K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 202651x their median

    Algeria are WAFCON Bronze Final winners! 🇩🇿🥉 #FIFAWWC

    4746691130K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202647x their median

    Six nations will compete for two spots in the Final Phase of the FIFA Women’s World Cup 2027™ Play-Off Tournament. Who will get them? 👀 #FIFAWWC

    407989529K viewsView on X
  • Jul 21, 202635x their median

    لقطات من استقبال الطاقم التحكيمي الأردني المشارك بكأس العالم 2026 https://t.co/KEgAO8cYS9

    342315324K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202615x their median

    صناع التاريخ 🇪🇸 أصبحت إسبانيا أول دولة تفوز بكأس العالم للسيدات FIFA وكأس العالم FIFA في وقت واحد! 🏆🏆 https://t.co/lrSG1v76AI

    146140014K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 202612x their median

    ليونيل ميسي يحطم رقماً قياسياً جديداً في @FIFAWorldCup ! 👏 https://t.co/ucS1Xpzu2U

    107814027K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#u17wwc#u20wwc

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 11 interactions against 4.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 15,519 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 0.067% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.362% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 64K interactions, about 5790x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #u17wwc, #u20wwc.

What is FIFA - عربي's engagement rate on X?
FIFA - عربي (@fifacom_ar) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,555,134 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, FIFA - عربي sits below the 10th percentile of the 155,670 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fifacom_ar have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (15,519 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fifacom_ar post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going