Fernanda Ostos engagement report
@fernandaostos - 233K followers on X
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 594 interactions against 233K followers, an engagement rate of 0.255%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 6.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 13x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #16deseptiembre, #coreyfeldman, #grooming.
Measured over 26 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 30, 2026. Recurring tags: #16deseptiembre, #coreyfeldman, #grooming.
Compared with accounts its own size
Fernanda Ostos's engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 92% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.255%, Fernanda Ostos sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 73% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 12% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 73% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 12% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 131 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Jul 19, 202613x their median
⚠️ MAKE HER FAMOUS 👇🏼 🚨 THIS VILE SPECIMEN STARVED HER DOG TO DEATH - HE WAS STARVED OVER A PROLONGED PERIOD - RECEIVES A SUSPENDED SENTENCE 🚨 Annasha Cara McCarthy, 28 from the Mayhill area of #swansea SA1: allowed her bulldog to waste away from prolonged starvation. Mother-of-two McCarthy was given a suspended jail sentence and banned for life from keeping animals after she allowed the three-year-old dog, Chico, to starve to death. He weighed only 10.9kg — half of what he weighed nine months earlier. Vets confirmed he had been starving for at least a month, his bones clearly visible, his body shutting down. What makes this case even more shocking is that McCarthy presented herself on Facebook as a loving, devoted dog owner, posting about how much she adored Chico while he was quietly suffering behind closed doors. In court she blamed her sickening cruelty on financial struggles and a dislike of "being judged". Justice for Chico. Animals deserve protection, not neglect. Sentencing | four‑month prison sentence, suspended for 18 months, along with 100 hours of unpaid work, 15 rehabilitation days, and a lifetime ban on keeping animals. Source UKACF.
- Mar 26, 20269.6x their median
Dime cositas picantes. https://t.co/QjzGBc5BCA
- Aug 24, 20266.6x their median
¿Me ayudan a saber quién es el dueño de esta camioneta por favor? Abandonó a su perro y se fue, el video se corta y no se sabe si ayudaron al perrito POR FAVOR X HAZ TU MAGIA https://t.co/MvzPgFE7Do
- Sep 14, 20263.5x their median
Un poquito de color para alegrarte el día… y un poquito de Fernanda para complicártelo. 🌈😏💋 https://t.co/8Vhqdg5Yuw
- May 14, 202624x their median
Puro contenido artesanal, mi ciela y nada de “ay qué pena”… Acá sí se desquita la suscripción 😌👉🏻https://t.co/7U4KevVtWu https://t.co/IfsqC14LfM
- Sep 19, 20262.8x their median
Buenos días, queridos. 😘 😘 Que nada ni nadie borre de sus caritas, la satisfacción de hacer lo que les gusta. 💋💋💋 https://t.co/MoFyVfvLQL
- Sep 13, 20262.4x their median
¿Qué harías si de la nada aparezco asi en tu cama?🤭 https://t.co/HlcsNHQENx
- Sep 12, 20262.1x their median
Sábado de descansar, ¿ustedes qué harán? Les dejo besos, queridos. 😘😘😘 https://t.co/6ngibuEfyM
- Sep 27, 20262.1x their median
Bonito domingo, queridos 💋 🥰 ¿Qué van a hacer hoy? https://t.co/OXZNuZaxeE
- Sep 6, 20262.0x their median
Extraño mucho cómo me dan los buenos días los domingos. https://t.co/NNixFh37Pu
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 594 interactions against 233K followers, an engagement rate of 0.255%. Measured over 26 original posts, its engagement rate beats 75% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 9.0K times each, and 6.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.86% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 26 posts sampled, 73% carry an image or video, 12% are part of a thread and 12% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.6K interactions, about 13x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #16deseptiembre, #coreyfeldman, #grooming.
- What is Fernanda Ostos's engagement rate on X?
- Fernanda Ostos (@fernandaostos) has an engagement rate of 0.255%, based on the median interactions across 26 original posts from the last 30 days against 233,235 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.255%, Fernanda Ostos sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @fernandaostos have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 75% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @fernandaostos post?
- Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.93 posts per day across the measured window.