Back to @fer's profile

Fernando "Fer" Alvarenga engagement report

@fer - 608K followers on X

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.006%
of 608K followers
Per impression
0.187%
19K views on a typical post
Reach
3.16%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
36
interactions (median)
Saved
0.005%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
14:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 608K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.187% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 393x its own typical post.

Measured over 8 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fernando "Fer" Alvarenga's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 13% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, Fernando "Fer" Alvarenga sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.694%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,146 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.694%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 14:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 114 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Apr 17, 2026393x their median

    Te amo @FalleNCS ♥️🥲

    14K293133135K viewsView on X
  • Jun 3, 202697x their median

    0-3, eliminados. sem muita chance de jogo em todos os jogos, mas eh isso :/ obrigado quem torceu e acreditou, 🙏

    3.4K11763117K viewsView on X
  • Aug 1, 202692x their median

    Galera, tem sorteio de skins para vocês em parceria com a @Dexsport 1º Bayonet | Doppler Phase 4 (Minimal Wear) 2º Hand Wraps | Cobalt Skulls (Field-Tested) +10x códigos pra brincar na Dex Quer participar? É só seguir os passos - Seguir a @Dexsport e @fer aqui no X - Marcar 2 amigos - Dar RT neste post Você pode participar até o dia 31 de agosto e o anúncio será feito em live!

    9431.2K1.2K661K viewsView on X
  • Jun 18, 202681x their median

    Yuurih 😮‍💨😮‍💨

    2.9K1911060K viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 202661x their median

    0-2 hoje. Stompados nos dois mapas, quase sem chance nenhuma de ganhar. Triste. Amanhã jogamos pela vida no major.

    2.2K6511106K viewsView on X
  • May 22, 202660x their median

    Valeu a torcida. Perdemos os dois jogos aqui em Portugal e agora temos o major pra jogar. Ggs

    2.1K5470115K viewsView on X
  • Jun 21, 202621x their median

    F 🥲

    756312027K viewsView on X
  • Jun 4, 202620x their median

    $20,000 SKINS GIVEAWAY ALERT We’re kicking things off with a massive giveaway together with OG.Dexsport Up for grabs: 🐉 AWP | Dragon Lore 🔪 9 Doppler Knives: Butterfly, Karambit, Bayonet, Talon, Ruby, Sapphire & more Want in? • Like & RT • Follow @Dexsport and @OGesportsCS • Drop your Dexsport username in the comments • Must place $10+ in total bets in June to qualify Winners will be announced on June 21

    32017419843153K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 202620x their median

    Ainda não superei 🥺😭 https://t.co/FMDy0XbP3Q

    698244576K viewsView on X
  • Apr 15, 202610x their median

    Bora aquecer! @CSGOSKINS_COM https://t.co/YW6n5MbK0Z

    35219042K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 36 interactions against 608K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 8 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 19K times each, and 0.187% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.17% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 8 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 393x its own typical post.

What is Fernando "Fer" Alvarenga's engagement rate on X?
Fernando "Fer" Alvarenga (@fer) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 8 original posts from the last 30 days against 608,153 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, Fernando "Fer" Alvarenga sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,146 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fer have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fer post?
Most posts go out around 14:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going