Back to @farmskins's profile

Farmskins engagement report

@farmskins - 391K followers on X

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 391K followers
Per impression
0.041%
9.7K views on a typical post
Reach
2.48%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
4
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 87% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

Measured over 60 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 1, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Farmskins's engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Farmskins sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.012%.

p100.002%
p250.012%
p50 (median)0.08%
p750.433%
p902.10%
p99160.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 36,654 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 106,977 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.012%
50th percentile0.08%
75th percentile0.433%
90th percentile2.10%
99th percentile160.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 6%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%51K
01:00 UTC-2%52K
02:00 UTC-3%50K
03:00 UTC-4%53K
04:00 UTC-6%43K
05:00 UTC-4%42K
06:00 UTC-4%48K
07:00 UTC-5%52K
08:00 UTC-4%61K
09:00 UTC-3%70K
10:00 UTC-2%72K
11:00 UTC-3%78K
12:00 UTC-2%86K
13:00 UTC-2%94K
14:00 UTC-4%97K
15:00 UTC-2%101K
16:00 UTC-3%98K
17:00 UTC-2%91K
18:00 UTC-1%85K
19:00 UTC-1%80K
20:00 UTC-1%74K
21:00 UTC-1%66K
22:00 UTC-1%57K
23:00 UTC-2%52K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 5%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+4%231K
Monday0%288K
Tuesday-2%278K
Wednesday-1%251K
Thursday-1%245K
Friday-3%253K
Saturday+3%227K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Best tweets

  • Aug 12, 20265.0x their median

    โ€œHow many hours in 2 weeks?โ€ Bro needed that information for scientific purposes ๐Ÿ’€ https://t.co/MMZfoRPcYf

    2000013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 20264.3x their median

    A REAL CS2 PLAYERโ€™S DAILY ROUTINE ๐Ÿ’€ 2 PM: fixing the wiring ๐Ÿ”งโ€จ2 AM: fixing the crosshair ๐ŸŽฏ Work-life balance?โ€จNever heard of it. Shall we play? ๐Ÿ‘€ https://t.co/iVVai9Q0Nh

    170009.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20264.3x their median

    Donโ€™t forget, to get a free bonus from us, all you need to do is use the promo code โ€œfarm25โ€ https://t.co/f9aFBzcWIF

    1610014K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20264.3x their median

    Aiming high ๐Ÿ‘€ S1mple believes the team should become a stable Top 20 team by the end of 2026 โ€” and break into the Top 10 in 2027. Big ambitions. But can they actually pull it off? ๐Ÿ”ฅ What do you think โ€” Top 10 in 2027? ๐Ÿ‘‡ https://t.co/n9jmWAD8F1

    1502011K viewsView on X
  • Aug 17, 20263.3x their median

    Evolution gave us tools. CS2 gave us teammates who still run around like itโ€™s their first game. ๐Ÿ’€๐Ÿ˜‚ Evolution: complete.โ€จMatchmaking: still loadingโ€ฆ ๐ŸŽฎ https://t.co/i8xvBEHRo3

    103007.1K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20263.3x their median

    Forget rare stickers. This cat is basically a retirement fund. ๐Ÿˆ๐Ÿ’ธ One scratch = my inventory value drops.โ€จOne nap = Katowice 2014 investments chilling. Who's adopting this legend? ๐Ÿ˜… https://t.co/jiB7ay1kfW

    130008.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 20262.8x their median

    [๐Ÿค”] A visual comparison of 16:9 vs 4:3 What Thour noticed: [๐ŸŸข] 16:9 feels too slow and sluggish to me [๐ŸŸข] I lose around 12โ€“15% of my average FPS [๐ŸŸข] This makes the pathways feel narrower Which side are you on? [โค๏ธ] โ€” 16:9 [๐Ÿ”ฅ] โ€” 4:3 https://t.co/ZW09tTbA8b

    1100013K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.8x their median

    8,000+ hours just to discover the real 10th idiot was on your team the whole time ๐Ÿ’€ 5,000 hours of CS2 laterโ€ฆ bro finally found the problem. Steam review or self-report? ๐Ÿ˜‚ https://t.co/flnm1AYTDk

    110009.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20262.5x their median

    WHAT A DAY! SPIRIT ARE THE EWC CHAMPIONS ๐Ÿ”ฅ๐Ÿ”ฅ It was a tough game, but FUTโ€™s lack of experience showed in the end โ€” they completely collapsed on the last map and gave it away. The Dragons, meanwhile, kept the pressure on and dictated the pace. Looks like Taganrog is going on a month-long bender ๐Ÿ’ช๐Ÿ˜‚ 13:10 Cache 16:13 Anubis 16:14 Ancient 13:5 Nuke

    1000010K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 20262.3x their median

    Donโ€™t forget, to get a free bonus from us, all you need to do is use the promo code โ€œfarm25โ€ https://t.co/Ci46bK4Eq5

    810011K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 4 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 60 original posts, its engagement rate beats 4% of 3,775 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.7K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 60 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 20 interactions, about 5.0x its own typical post.

What is Farmskins's engagement rate on X?
Farmskins (@farmskins) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 60 original posts from the last 30 days against 391,340 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Farmskins sits below the 10th percentile of the 36,654 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @farmskins have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 4% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,775 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @farmskins post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going