Back to @fanamokoena's profile

Fana Mokoena engagement report

@fanamokoena - 282K followers on X

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.034%
of 282K followers
Per impression
1.04%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
95
interactions (median)
Saved
0.022%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
04:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 95 interactions against 282K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.8K interactions, about 50x its own typical post.

Measured over 27 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fana Mokoena's engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.034%, Fana Mokoena sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 04:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video41% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link7% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 41% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 7% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 185 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 202650x their median

    Black Consciousness produced some of the best minds in this proud land. We salute https://t.co/Fq22Sgs4K1

    4.3K40123578K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202635x their median

    Stand up, take a bow Adv Segeels-Ncube. We salute https://t.co/5st19C7F2F

    3.1K200261033K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202616x their median

    New information on Sibiya’s case suggests this chap’s world is extremely disturbing

    1.3K223381191K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 20268.5x their median

    Lawrence Chamurwa Mudzinganyama has laid one fact bare: The construction industry must be put under the microscope. The CIDB must answer for the multi-grading of Moriel in one day. All other entities under Public Works must be investigated and all contracts with gov reviewed

    5672241469.8K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20266.8x their median

    Salute https://t.co/a5WWgivExu

    553837411K viewsView on X
  • Jul 22, 20265.9x their median

    Are the gloves off yet orrrrr….. https://t.co/ogZd21PbpR

    4446141825K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20264.7x their median

    The Solidarity Movement, which includes @afriforum and Solidarity, today announced five proposed answers to the five asks of the US. Last year, the US government put five asks to the South African government about issues that had sparked a dispute between the two countries. https://t.co/U2neqHaz0Y

    215491453446K viewsView on X
  • Jul 28, 20264.6x their median

    I don’t think Fadiel Adams knows he has a right to not say anything

    3683432622K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20264.6x their median

    No doubt in my mind. Come November, I’ll be voting Mayibuye. Whatever party you vote for, vote for progress ❤️ https://t.co/WW1OIZQRXi

    279471021020K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20264.5x their median

    So if the charges against Khumalo & co are dropped, then all that hard work by Mchunu, Johnson, Khan and their cohorts would’ve been in vain, leaving them in hospitals, resigned and without support. It’s embarrassing at best

    346731119.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 95 interactions against 282K followers, an engagement rate of 0.034%. Measured over 27 original posts, its engagement rate beats 40% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 1.04% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.22% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 27 posts sampled, 41% carry an image or video, 7% are part of a thread and 7% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.8K interactions, about 50x its own typical post.

What is Fana Mokoena's engagement rate on X?
Fana Mokoena (@fanamokoena) has an engagement rate of 0.034%, based on the median interactions across 27 original posts from the last 30 days against 282,444 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.034%, Fana Mokoena sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fanamokoena have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 40% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fanamokoena post?
Most posts go out around 04:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going