Back to @famemmatv's profile

FAME MMA engagement report

@famemmatv - 691K followers on X

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.018%
of 691K followers
Per impression
0.359%
34K views on a typical post
Reach
4.87%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
121
interactions (median)
Saved
0.012%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.43/day
active 50% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 121 interactions against 691K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.359% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.9K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

FAME MMA's engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 24% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.018%, FAME MMA sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video89% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 89% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 187 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 28, 202624x their median

    Wybaczcie za cenzurę @SuperbetPL https://t.co/e07PKpuiR8

    2.9K9110152K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202611x their median

    Super grafika w tym nowym GTA, nie mogę doczekać się premiery https://t.co/ER7Z1CWoN1

    1.3K106030K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202610x their median

    LEQU WYGRYWA NA FAME 32: THE GAME 🏆 Niezniszczalny zrobił rekordową liczbę kółek dookoła klatki, ale za to punktów się nie zdobywa... Streamer wygrywa swoją debiutancką walkę w federacji FAME po jednogłośnej decyzji sędziowskiej! 👊🏻 https://t.co/2VZYCwe79Z

    1.2K22424120K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 20267.7x their median

    EMOCJONALNA WYPOWIEDŹ LIZY NA TEMAT SWOJEGO OFa Liza:🗣️ „Ja wiem, że ja nie wymażę tego, że pokazywałam dupska na OF. Ja tego nie wymażę. Minęło 2 lata od tego, jak tego nie prowadzę, a cały czas mu się tłumaczyć. Właśnie chciałam pokazać, że kurde, jestem normalna po prostu. Nie wiesz, z jakich powodów to robiłam. Nie wiesz, że nie miałam kasy. W moim kraju wydarzyła się wojna i przeprowadziłam się i wiesz, i musiałam sobie jakoś radzić. Ja, miałam 21 lat. Z tych pieniędzy utrzymywałam moją siostrę i moją mamę. Ja jeszcze wysłałam na Ukrainę, na wojnę mojej babci pieniądze. Myślisz, że ja teraz tego nie żałuję? Ty myślisz, że ja teraz tego nie żałuję? Żałuję, ale po prostu biorę to na klatę. Biorę to na klatę i ponoszę konsekwencje.”

    80711154510K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20266.5x their median

    LeQu vs Bad Boy Jr na FAME 33: GRAND FREAKS Wszystko zaczęło się dawno temu od jednej kłótni na OMEGLE! Krótka wymiana zdań przerodziła się w konflikt, którym żyje cała internetowa społeczność LeQu chce upokorzyć Mareczka za wiele słów - nie tylko na temat jego wagi. Bad Boy Jr zadebiutuje w FAME w formule MMA i… może sporo nauczyć się na błędach Niezniszczalnego

    611615212164K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20266.1x their median

    ''Wole przebrać się za babę, niż prosić o różyczki przez 24 godziny'' ~ Don Kasjo Król https://t.co/11ZTZyzSuE

    73208042K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20264.9x their median

    Bardzo intensywny dzień, nie wiem czy bym sobie dał radę… https://t.co/3hxQSTEryT

    579314065K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.9x their median

    Jakbyś mógł przywrócić jednego zawodnika do FAME - kto to by był? https://t.co/CxB8myVHlf

    41311742122K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20264.2x their median

    Na razie Tybori oraz Boguś na wylocie z turnieju https://t.co/sBYlvLwOM2

    480032094K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20264.1x their median

    Roberto Soldić w UFC! 🥊 Rok temu oglądaliśmy go na FAME 27, gdzie na zasadach bokserskich pokonał Tomasza Adamka. Teraz przed Robocopem kolejny wielki rozdział kariery 👊🏻 Gratulacje, Roberto. Powodzenia w UFC - trzymamy za Ciebie kciuki. Jesteśmy dumni, że mogliśmy być częścią tej drogi! ❤️

    485312248K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 121 interactions against 691K followers, an engagement rate of 0.018%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 42% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.359% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.88% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 89% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.9K interactions, about 24x its own typical post.

What is FAME MMA's engagement rate on X?
FAME MMA (@famemmatv) has an engagement rate of 0.018%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 690,747 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.018%, FAME MMA sits above the 10th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @famemmatv have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 42% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @famemmatv post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.43 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going