Back to @faisalislam's profile

Faisal Islam engagement report

@faisalislam - 366K followers on X

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 366K followers
Per impression
0.548%
26K views on a typical post
Reach
7.00%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
140
interactions (median)
Saved
0.033%
8 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.73/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
11:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 140 interactions against 366K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.548% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 30% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 578x its own typical post.

Measured over 30 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 4, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Faisal Islam's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, Faisal Islam sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.142%
p750.671%
p902.53%
p9982.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 201,555 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,929 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.142%
75th percentile0.671%
90th percentile2.53%
99th percentile82.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 11:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video50% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link10% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 50% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 10% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 406 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 1, 2026578x their median

    DE NO CREER Anunciamos una cadena nacional para el jueves a las 21:00 hs. sobre un tema SAGRADO para los argentinos como es la causa de Malvinas, un reclamo histórico del pueblo argentino que al día de hoy sigue viendo violentada su soberanía nacional, y las MIERDAS HUMANAS (95%) de siempre salen a llorar por el uso de la cadena nacional. ¿Qué causa mÔs importante y estratégica para los intereses vitales de la Nación puede haber mÔs importante que la causa Malvinas? ¿Si este tema, que desconocen absolutamente, no amerita una cadena nacional, que tema lo ameritaría? O serÔ que simplemente hay un conjunto de MIERDAS HUMANAS (95%) que van a atacar al gobierno incluso si implica defender intereses extranjeros? Vergüenza les debería dar. Nosotros seguiremos defendiendo los intereses de la Nación Argentina con uñas y dientes pese a quien le pese. VIVA LA LIBERTAD CARAJO...!!!

    66K8.2K5.6K1.1K5.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 30, 2026382x their median

    We stand shoulder to shoulder with our European colleagues and fully support the collective view. We oppose FIFA’s plans. The FIFA World Cup belongs to football and always will. https://t.co/BuF7srQ8cJ

    47K5.7K4962801.2M viewsView on X
  • Jul 8, 201931x their median

    Hello all - I’m back on here, back in economics and after a few weeks wilfully getting lost in transit, am newly on herešŸ‘‡šŸ¾, and shortly on air in a new role as Economics Editor of the BBC.. first take on data, trade wars, Brexit, fiscal gymnastics...šŸ‘‹ https://t.co/3ZFevXzDG8

    3.1K47865692View on X
  • Jul 31, 202629x their median

    BREAKING: Infantino's senior advisor Carlos Cordeiro QUITS over World Cup plan https://t.co/OTbA8vFXRw https://t.co/XYezrr1muA

    3.3K5758388283K viewsView on X
  • Apr 24, 202625x their median

    Today we announce Thrive Eternal, a permanent capital holding company that will be concentrated in a small number of assets that we can own and steward over many decades. Across Thrive Capital and Thrive Holdings, we are building and investing through a moment of exponential change; backing emerging technologies, the infrastructure that powers them, and the businesses they can transform. Increasingly, we see a fourth category. These are assets with qualities that cannot be replicated by technology. Iconic franchises and cultural institutions rooted in tradition, identity, and shared experience. In a world shaped by abundant intelligence where creation scales and distribution fragments, we believe they will matter even more. Thrive Eternal is built on the belief that the most enduring of these assets share common characteristics: they benefit from long-term stewardship, they compound through cultural resonance, and they are enhanced by technology rather than displaced by it. Our work at Thrive has always been informed and inspired by a deep appreciation for product, brand, and the ways in which consumers form lasting relationships with the things they love. We have been building towards this for a long time. Our first partnership is expected to be with the San Francisco Giants - an institution built on more than a century of shared identity and community, and among the most iconic sports franchises in America. We have reached an agreement, subject to league approval, to acquire an ownership stake. We feel privileged by the opportunity to be long-term partners to the Giants.

    3.1K95157114620K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20268.7x their median

    UK Q2 GDP growth revised up to 0.5% by ONS. So top growth in G7 in q1, second in q2 to Canada, overall fastest growth of g7 economies so far in 2026. GDP per capita also revised up to 0.5% growth. Definitely defying the suggestion that the Iran war would hit UK hardest.

    85517814247134K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20268.3x their median

    Incredible! https://t.co/zwOq056xRm

    1.1K7716641K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20267.5x their median

    Interesting escalation: Treasury Select Committee chair Labour MP Meg Hillier writes to the head of HMRC querying whether they have asked for the full unredacted Premier League judgment on Man City and asked if tax authorities are ā€œseized of the importanceā€ and public interest in the case

    775216361977K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20267.2x their median

    "Brexit has caused more harm than good." PM Andy Burnham says rejoining the EU is among 'different options' he will look at to reshape the UK's long-term relationship with Europe. https://t.co/NMBUoVC8YX

    55313126950148K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20267.2x their median

    Totally unforgettable… Moment of totality. Eclipse twilight, solar flares, corona, stars appearing above in the Ebro Delta. Stunning. https://t.co/r0k3qy2XQi

    91660216111K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 140 interactions against 366K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 30 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 26K times each, and 0.548% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 7.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 30 posts sampled, 50% carry an image or video, 30% are part of a thread and 10% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 81K interactions, about 578x its own typical post.

What is Faisal Islam's engagement rate on X?
Faisal Islam (@faisalislam) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 30 original posts from the last 30 days against 365,855 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, Faisal Islam sits above the 25th percentile of the 201,555 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @faisalislam have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @faisalislam post?
Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.73 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going