Back to @fabio_stallion's profile

Stallion Fabio engagement report

@fabio_stallion - 467K followers on X

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.398%
of 467K followers
Per impression
3.63%
51K views on a typical post
Reach
10.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.475%
242 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.37/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
08:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 467K followers, an engagement rate of 0.398%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 3.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 44% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lgbtqiaforachange, #lgbtqiasupportrevolution.

Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 27, 2026. Recurring tags: #lgbtqiaforachange, #lgbtqiasupportrevolution.

Compared with accounts its own size

Stallion Fabio's engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 83% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.398%, Stallion Fabio sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.146% to 0.697%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9983.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,825 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,436 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 08:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link75% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 75% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 107 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 29, 20266.9x their median

    Down on your knees 🧎 NEW CONTENT EVERYDAY: https://t.co/hAnBXvlGFI https://t.co/Rj6k7Fnbig

    11K1.5K16110162K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 20265.7x their median

    People were shocked by my fat hard cock on the beach: https://t.co/dw1ro9Tzkl 💦 https://t.co/HrIG8rzxJL

    9.3K1.1K1358234K viewsView on X
  • Sep 19, 20263.7x their median

    Gym Showers at Basic Fit are the best!🔥💦 Complete Video: https://t.co/vkNjpOCtGE https://t.co/sMcoUtZ3An

    6.2K593524141K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 20262.9x their median

    Backstage of our show at @idmsauna with @theokami_x FULL VIDEO: https://t.co/19bDuNY7vs https://t.co/DJhxeqmC6R

    4.9K540302103K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20262.9x their median

    🔉« Elle est grosse, Ooooh oui ! » Mon 🇲🇦 a kiffé se la prendre et se faire remplir 💦😈 Regarde la vidéo entière : https://t.co/ZsPKTHi3rQ https://t.co/qCMPDJRel5

    4.8K472334128K viewsView on X
  • Aug 11, 20262.0x their median

    Sucked by this hot Cuban 🇨🇺 VOD: https://t.co/mEl0iW5fJo OF: https://t.co/nGx0F56WEg https://t.co/MeIgLKVW5a

    3.4K33521176K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20222.2x their median

    Uff 🥵 call us and we’ll join you in your hotel room 😈We can be your men for the night. https://t.co/Pipl86GDHF

    3.3K400261View on X
  • Oct 24, 20262.0x their median

    I’m fucking horny! https://t.co/cAc1yTrXVP 35% off now! https://t.co/oFMYNeFZnd

    3.3K30425247K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.0x their median

    Branlé en conduisant 🔥🚗 40% OFF: https://t.co/xfj1Mr9ybS https://t.co/fXFmG33lO6

    3.3K33726074K viewsView on X
  • May 14, 20232.1x their median

    Join https://t.co/Y3kyBr0MNY to watch me fuck the hot bodybuilder @ZebHadid 💦 https://t.co/x7Hd9SOYgo

    3.2K373101329K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lgbtqiaforachange#lgbtqiasupportrevolution

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 467K followers, an engagement rate of 0.398%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 89% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 51K times each, and 3.63% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.9% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.4 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 44% are part of a thread and 75% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 13K interactions, about 6.9x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lgbtqiaforachange, #lgbtqiasupportrevolution.

What is Stallion Fabio's engagement rate on X?
Stallion Fabio (@fabio_stallion) has an engagement rate of 0.398%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 466,957 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.398%, Stallion Fabio sits above the 50th percentile of the 212,825 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fabio_stallion have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 89% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fabio_stallion post?
Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.37 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going