Back to @fabio_stallion's profile

Stallion Fabio engagement report

@fabio_stallion - 459K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.367%
of 459K followers
Per impression
3.78%
45K views on a typical post
Reach
9.70%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.7K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.478%
213 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.23/day
active 70% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 459K followers, an engagement rate of 0.367%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 3.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 39% are part of a thread and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lgbtqiaqueeringtomorrow, #lgbtqiasummerneverends.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #lgbtqiaqueeringtomorrow, #lgbtqiasummerneverends.

Compared with accounts its own size

Stallion Fabio's engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.367%, Stallion Fabio sits above the 50th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.1% to 0.5%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.5%
p902.09%
p99116.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 68,576 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 55,420 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.5%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile116.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link83% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 83% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 119 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 20262.2x their median

    Sucked by this hot Cuban 🇨🇺 VOD: https://t.co/mEl0iW5fJo OF: https://t.co/nGx0F56WEg https://t.co/MeIgLKVW5a

    3.4K33521176K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20222.2x their median

    Uff 🥵 call us and we’ll join you in your hotel room 😈We can be your men for the night. https://t.co/Pipl86GDHF

    3.3K400261View on X
  • May 14, 20232.1x their median

    Join https://t.co/Y3kyBr0MNY to watch me fuck the hot bodybuilder @ZebHadid 💦 https://t.co/x7Hd9SOYgo

    3.2K373101329K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20261.9x their median

    🇫🇷 Ce mec XXL était de passage à Montpellier et on l’a trouvé sur la G app. Ni une, ni deux, on l’a invité à la maison avec @tonysilverx pour s’occuper de sa grosse queue. Regardez comme j’ai gobé sa teub ! LIEN: https://t.co/u17QU1eEP2 - 🇬🇧 This XXL guy was passing through Montpellier and we found him on the G app. Right away, @tonysilverx and I invited him over to take care of his fat dick. Look at how I swallowed his cock! LINK: https://t.co/u17QU1eEP2

    2.9K25714487K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.9x their median

    With my Brazilian friend in Paris for a hot threesome. Full movie: https://t.co/lNe4XPAmy2 https://t.co/6SfYCjid5a

    2.8K26623247K viewsView on X
  • Aug 9, 20261.8x their median

    Latin guys are the best 😈🔥 @fabio_stallion& @soyjose_9801 VOD: https://t.co/2rIBNcgkBp OF: https://t.co/cAc1yTrq6h https://t.co/bLj1AmcETC

    2.8K28014271K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 2026

    Got a blowjob and fucked at a motorway rest area 🤪 https://t.co/xfj1Mr90mk Je me suis fait sucer et j’ai ken sur une aire d’autoroute https://t.co/SuOUaKaMWk

    2.2K14010073K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 2026

    On l'a éclaté à deux @Bussycross @KevinHungXL @Fabio_Stallion UNLOCKT: https://t.co/Ep30QKtSH0 https://t.co/uopwhAH71y

    2.0K21916248K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 2026

    #LGBTQIAQueeringTomorrow Les soumis 👇😈 UNLOCKT: https://t.co/s5SxK9ocse Collab: @LeoRoyaleXXX / @Fabio_Stallion https://t.co/2dtGdep4yc

    2.0K24015257K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 2026

    Rimming @soyjose_9801 ‘s ass made me crazy 🤪 https://t.co/XsBJMFQHHb Direct access (watch now): https://t.co/X1jmgNEAAJ https://t.co/bcGDpDaio9

    1.8K1249057K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lgbtqiaqueeringtomorrow#lgbtqiasummerneverends

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.7K interactions against 459K followers, an engagement rate of 0.367%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 85% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 45K times each, and 3.78% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.70% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 70% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video, 39% are part of a thread and 83% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 2.2x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lgbtqiaqueeringtomorrow, #lgbtqiasummerneverends.

What is Stallion Fabio's engagement rate on X?
Stallion Fabio (@fabio_stallion) has an engagement rate of 0.367%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 459,230 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.367%, Stallion Fabio sits above the 50th percentile of the 68,576 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @fabio_stallion have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 85% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @fabio_stallion post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going