Everstake engagement report
@everstake_pool - 101K followers on X
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 101K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #weeklyapr, #everstakegovernance.
Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #weeklyapr, #everstakegovernance.
Compared with accounts its own size
Everstake's engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.023%, Everstake sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.679% |
| 90th percentile | 2.56% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 90% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 24% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 90% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 24% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 679 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 7, 202659x their median
Today we are releasing the new Injective Whitepaper. It is the first full rewrite since our original paper in December 2018, which described a front-running-resistant exchange protocol on Ethereum. Eight years later, Injective has evolved greatly into becoming a layer-1 blockchain for institutional-grade finance and tokenization. Every layer of the protocol exists to issue real-world assets and give them real utility across markets, applications, and AI agents. Inside the paper → Asset issuance. Native RWA tokenization with role-based permissions over mint, send, receive, and burn, plus programmable receive hooks and sealable namespaces → RWA exposure. iAssets, stablecoin-margined, oracle-priced derivatives that track external assets with no wrapping or pre-funding → Trading. Tokenized assets trade on a fully onchain CLOB where each block runs a sealed frequent batch auction at a uniform clearing price, resisting front-running and ordering MEV → Settlement. BFT consensus with a greater-than-two-thirds commit threshold delivers deterministic finality with ~600ms blocks → Composability. Native EVM and WASM in one canonical state, with the MultiVM Token Standard keeping a single bank-module balance per asset, exposed to Solidity through precompiles → Derivatives. Perpetuals with time-weighted premium funding, initial and maintenance margin checks, reduce-only liquidations, and insurance funds → Agentic finance. AI agents operate on tokenized assets through MCP servers, policy-bounded signing, and x402 machine payments in USDC → Value accrual. Onchain protocol revenue flows to the recurring Community BuyBack for $INJ The paper formalizes each mechanism, from the consensus threshold and block lifecycle to the batch clearing rule, oracle accounting, derivative risk checks, permission model, and dynamic issuance controller. From issuance to settlement, one chain built for the full lifecycle of tokenized finance. Read it below.
- Oct 12, 202641x their median
CARDANO
- Oct 15, 202623x their median
NEAR’s MPC network now runs with 17 live mainnet operators, funded by the Protocol. The MPC network is a decentralized network composed of highly reputable, independent operators that power Chain Signatures, the signing layer behind NEAR Intents. HSP-007, approved by House of Stake, moves MPC node operations from discretionary grants to a standing program paid from Protocol emissions and governed by NEAR token holders. Mainnet operators include @astrostakers, @auroraisnear, @Bitwise, Blacksand, @everstake_pool, @greenfield_cap, @HashKeyCloud, Klever, @luganodes, @MPCH_Labs, @nansen_ai, @NatsaiOU, Near One, @Nodemonste, @StakinOfficial (The TIE), @staking4all, and @svrn_ai. This new incentive program helps ensure the critical signing infrastructure that powers NEAR Intents and the cross-chain economy has a funding model built for the long run. https://t.co/TUB9vhGKDu
- Oct 7, 20268.9x their median
‼️@Cardano's “quiet phase” may be over. cardano:native whale activity has reached its highest level since June 4, with 413 transactions worth more than $100K recorded in a single day. At the same time, Cardano’s social dominance has climbed to 1.16%, its highest level of 2026, while ADA has moved from around $0.19 to $0.27 since September 16, bringing the network back into the center of the market conversation. We see that whale activity, social attention, and new ecosystem developments are all accelerating at the same time, creating a much stronger backdrop for Cardano's growth. With RealFi launched on mainnet on October 1, growing anticipation around Leios, new institutional infrastructure, and Fireblocks expanding support for Cardano native tokens. We also believe Q4 deserves particular attention when it comes to Cardano. Historically, the fourth quarter has produced some of ADA’s strongest periods, including major moves in 2023 and 2024. And right now, Cardano has entered Q4 with a completely different level of attention, and the network has plenty of room to surprise the market. We’re proud to support Cardano and watch this ecosystem continue to develop. And for everyone who has been counting it out for too long, this quarter could be a very interesting reminder that Cardano will win no matter what.
- Oct 9, 20268.9x their median
📣 Attention cardano:native community: ADA staking is now live in @LumoWallet, powered by @everstake_pool 's resilient infrastructure. Backed by validator infrastructure held to high standards and trusted by 1.6M+ users. Step-by-step guide: https://t.co/rkPNsHKcA7 https://t.co/Lnp9mySwAA
- Oct 12, 20268.4x their median
❗@Cardano just broke a 5-year-old record. In Epoch 660, the network processed 1,780,896 transactions, beating its previous record of 1,566,974 set in November 2021. That’s a new all-time high, with an average of 83.83 transactions per block. We think this shows how much Cardano has grown through continuous development, network upgrades and improvements to its infrastructure. The team keeps building, and the results speak for themselves. But the developers aren’t the only ones who deserve credit. The Cardano community has been there through every stage, supporting the ecosystem and helping it move forward. Without this community, Cardano wouldn’t be where it is today. 💙 We’re happy to be part of this journey, and we know that Cardano still has plenty of surprises ahead. The market might not be ready for what Cardano does next.
- Oct 8, 20265.3x their median
⚠️@Cardano bears might want to look away. Since the beginning of 2026, Cardano’s Token Trading Volume / FDMC ratio has surged 188.7%, according to @artemis, showing a major expansion in trading activity relative to the network’s fully diluted valuation. And honestly, we like what we’re seeing. Cardano keeps building, the ecosystem keeps moving and thousands of new users are choosing the network because onboarding is very easy. We’ve been happy to be part of that journey and to watch the network grow along the way and the rest of 2026 could get pretty fun.
- Oct 5, 20265.3x their median
Aptos will win.
- Oct 9, 20264.8x their median
Who keeps calling @Aptos dead? We have a transaction counter to show you. The network recorded 1.4B transactions in Q3 2026, matching its quarterly record, while total transactions have reached 7.5B. We think that’s a pretty solid reason to stop treating Aptos like yesterday’s news. The market can argue about narratives all day, but this level of activity deserves a closer look. Huge credit to the Aptos team for the work behind this ecosystem. If people still think there’s nothing happening here, perhaps it’s time to look at the data.
- Oct 2, 20263.8x their median
🚨BREAKING: @Solana continues to dominate app revenue across all chains for the 10th consecutive quarter, with Q3 2026 revenue up 42.6% QoQ to $365M, the highest since Q4 2025. Top apps by Q3 revenue share: 🥇 @Pumpfun : 39% 🥈 @fomo : 14% 🥉 @AxiomExchange : 11% https://t.co/ah2YK3NT3E
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 23 interactions against 101K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 27% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 2.1K times each, and 1.07% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.13% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 90% carry an image or video, 29% are part of a thread and 24% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 59x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #weeklyapr, #everstakegovernance.
- What is Everstake's engagement rate on X?
- Everstake (@everstake_pool) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 100,547 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.023%, Everstake sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,676 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @everstake_pool have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 27% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @everstake_pool post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.6 posts per day across the measured window.