Back to @ethmaxi's profile

BRANDO engagement report

@ethmaxi - 162K followers on X

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.101%
of 162K followers
Per impression
2.66%
6.2K views on a typical post
Reach
3.81%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
164
interactions (median)
Saved
0.032%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.97/day
active 60% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 164 interactions against 162K followers, an engagement rate of 0.101%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 2.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 129x its own typical post.

Measured over 25 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

BRANDO's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 70% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.101%, BRANDO sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video28% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 28% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 180 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 20, 2026129x their median

    Last week, @X sued several people who abused Creator Revenue Sharing by operating a coordinated network of accounts, posting inauthentic content to manipulate engagement, and using multiple bank accounts to hide their scheme. We do not tolerate fraudulent behavior on X -- and will act forcefully to protect our platform and the earnings of genuine creators. You can read our lawsuit here: https://t.co/EKHFX06nSY

    18K1.7K1.2K5539.5M viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20268.6x their median

    We’ve made progress. Check your Shiesty (WL) in our bio. Soon. https://t.co/ziXRYGQYDJ

    8032113653056K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20267.2x their median

    Alright, it’s time. Multiple spots. Drop your wallets.

    50292585123K viewsView on X
  • Oct 12, 20266.7x their median

    Artwork NFT on Ethereum. Free mint. Coming soon. Sounds like I’ll be the one handling spots. New systems and no village feeders. Who needs a spot?

    65148395320K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20264.3x their median

    We checked which DAOs are dumping floors for $0.10-$0.50 and consistently proving they’re broke exit liquidity merchants Warning to CMs and project teams: stop handing out spots to DAOs that nuke your floor for pocket change Do your research before giving them a single allocation: Link with full data in comments 👇

    372471929374K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20263.9x their median

    An update on @ProjectShiesty collabs: We’ve identified 4 more groups that have been caught fraudulently submitting farm wallets. This morning we removed 234 wallets farm-funded, and another 400 that were newly created (by same groups). We have 634 available spots now. Collabs are back open. Hit the DM’s.

    40037198413K viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 20263.2x their median

    Does your group sell for peanuts? We’re gonna find out 🫪 Kept 300+ collabs on a spreadsheet, including wallets and groups for the free @ProjectShiesty mint. Let’s see what groups are actual supporters. I’ll be calling out the extractors, cheaters, etc. Report to come.

    330241402522K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 20262.3x their median

    I’ve blocked a lot of people today. I’ve made a list of groups that will never get allocations for upcoming free mints. They all reside from the same country. Interesting data.

    295774514K viewsView on X
  • Oct 15, 20262.3x their median

    I was right. All the NFT’s launching are collaborating with the same groups. All going to ZERO. The same paid actors feeding their small villages in the coasts of Africa, Asia and more. Leaders doing undisclosed paid promotions. NFT mints are now a charity.

    25716941214K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20261.8x their median

    Who wants on this? https://t.co/jXCKZFKhVI

    180710605.2K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 164 interactions against 162K followers, an engagement rate of 0.101%. Measured over 25 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 6.2K times each, and 2.66% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.81% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 25 posts sampled, 28% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21K interactions, about 129x its own typical post.

What is BRANDO's engagement rate on X?
BRANDO (@ethmaxi) has an engagement rate of 0.101%, based on the median interactions across 25 original posts from the last 30 days against 162,021 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.101%, BRANDO sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ethmaxi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ethmaxi post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.97 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going