Back to @essediafoilouco's profile

Carter engagement report

@essediafoilouco - 194K followers on X

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.096%
of 194K followers
Per impression
2.65%
7.0K views on a typical post
Reach
3.62%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
186
interactions (median)
Saved
0.028%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.13/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 194K followers, an engagement rate of 0.096%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 223x its own typical post.

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 11, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Carter's engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 71% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.096%, Carter sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link4% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 4% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 271 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 2026223x their median

    A língua portuguesa é tão engraçada que quando a pessoa diz “ah, faça-me o favor” na verdade ela está dizendo “ah, vai pra puta que te pariu, seu arrombado.”

    35K6.0K3697264K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 202692x their median

    Quando for beber, coma fígado de tira-gosto. O álcool vai ficar confuso e não vai saber qual fígado atacar. Você sofrerá, tendencialmente, apenas metade da potencial sobrecarga hepática.

    16K1.0K102119236K viewsView on X
  • Oct 16, 202471x their median

    Repito: acreditem nos seus sonhos. https://t.co/hAfXtRS3gL

    12K700146133463K viewsView on X
  • Oct 4, 202626x their median

    A estratégia do brasileiro deve ser colocar os piores candidatos possíveis no poder, esperar eles acabarem com o país de vez e depois esperar o Brasil virar SAF.

    4.3K3251051949K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 202621x their median

    Cêis tão ligados que os escravocratas eram contra o fim da escravidão e diziam que libertar os escravizados quebraria a economia do país, né?

    3.5K30274637K viewsView on X
  • Apr 9, 202216x their median

    Ela toda produzida, toda linda, e eu com a camisa do Liverpool ❤ https://t.co/RM2nhw4qtd

    2.7K2718433View on X
  • Sep 14, 202613x their median

    E acharam dessas novas bandeiras da torcida do Flamengo? https://t.co/NC2Vgc3vOx

    2.3K112521433K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 20268.7x their median

    Eu ri demais vendo essa porra kkkkk https://t.co/MYefJx76Xj

    1.5K9212639K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20268.7x their median

    O Clube de Regatas do Flamengo sabe jogar a Copa Libertadores. Além de ter o melhor elenco, o melhor time e ser o maior clube da América, o Flamengo se especializou em amedrontar o continente. Nos últimos anos, nós vimos a história ser escrita diante dos nossos olhos. Vimos o Flamengo se transformar na cara da Libertadores, atropelando adversários, impondo sua superioridade técnica e tratando grandes jogos como se fossem parte da rotina. Mas hoje foi diferente. Hoje o Flamengo venceu como venceria um Boca Juniors do início dos anos 2000. Na camisa. Na presença. Na experiência. Naquele vulto assustador que entra em campo antes mesmo de a bola começar a rolar. As asas do urubu se abriram numa envergadura capaz de superar até o maior dos condores andinos. Porque esse Flamengo também sabe sofrer. É versátil. Aguenta pressão. Entende o jogo. E, quando aparece a oportunidade, é letal. Tem jogadores experientes, multicampeões, ídolos do clube e especialistas nesse tipo de noite. Atiradores de elite que não precisam de cinco chances. Precisam de uma. Uma bola. Um espaço. Um segundo. E a história está escrita. Vitória gigantesca do Flamengo na altitude. Daquelas que não são construídas apenas com futebol, mas com camisa, personalidade e peso continental. Agora é voltar para casa. Porque o Flamengo deu um passo enorme para confirmar a classificação no jogo da volta. E o jogo da volta é no Maracanã. Na Libertadores. Contra o Flamengo. Boa sorte.

    1.5K9818017K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20268.7x their median

    O twitter, essa rede desprovida de graça, está encaminhando as coisas para romantizar Daniel Vorcaro. “Viveu o extraordinário” “Soube viver” “Festas sei que lá” Ah, vtnc, Twitter, esse cara roubou BILHÕES. Eu e você que vamos pagar essa conta. Não fode.

    1.5K9432420K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 186 interactions against 194K followers, an engagement rate of 0.096%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 59% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 7.0K times each, and 2.65% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.62% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 41K interactions, about 223x its own typical post.

What is Carter's engagement rate on X?
Carter (@essediafoilouco) has an engagement rate of 0.096%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 194,427 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.096%, Carter sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @essediafoilouco have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 59% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @essediafoilouco post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going