Back to @espinof_com's profile

Espinof engagement report

@espinof_com - 679K followers on X

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 679K followers
Per impression
0.039%
2.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.38%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.63/day
active 23% of days
Peak time
12:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 679K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.039% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36 interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

Measured over 100 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 3, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Espinof's engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 2% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Espinof sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.695%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,270 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,455 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.695%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 12:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video4% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link96% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 4% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 96% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 161 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 11, 202636x their median

    'Bluey' se ha convertido rápidamente en uno de los mayores fenómenos animados de los últimos años, y tiene fascinados tanto a niños como adultos. Es tierna, alegre y creativa y, en realidad, hay una base científica para explicar por qué nos gusta tantísimo🧵 https://t.co/eIGgykPDCl

    286205.9K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 202621x their median

    "A nadie le gustó la película cuando se estrenó, pero a mí sí". Durante 28 años, Ethan Hawke ha sido un gran fan de este clásico de la ciencia ficción https://t.co/nPINKY3yLp

    1125322K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202617x their median

    Solo tiene 6 episodios y para mí es perfecta. Esta serie británica de suspense convierte una desaparición en un misterio fascinante https://t.co/iL3nGMtuyc

    170008.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 202616x their median

    Casi nadie sabe que existe, pero es una de las mejores series de ciencia ficción de Prime Video y solo tiene 8 episodios https://t.co/03nOEBGf00

    132106.7K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202615x their median

    A 'Cadena perpetua' (The Shawshank Redemption, 1994) le costó encontrar a su público, pero con el tiempo se ha convertido en un clásico imprescindible para los amantes del cine. Está llena de escenas icónicas, pero la más difícil de rodar fue una que involucraba a un gusano 🧵 https://t.co/r1Gg4fYqOy

    112203.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202613x their median

    Con 'El hombre de acero' (Man of Steel, 2013), Zack Snyder tenía la complicada tarea de capitanear el universo cinematográfico de DC. Un reinicio total con Superman como protagonista, aunque su versión llegó con polémica y alguna que otra queja por parte de Christopher Nolan 🧵 https://t.co/kG5XuNmQhM

    120107.4K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202612x their median

    La nueva película de Jason Statham se ha filtrado accidentalmente en Prime Video antes de su estreno en cines, y los distribuidores están que trinan. "Es una cagada gigantesca" https://t.co/VtgQo71dDf

    91205.7K viewsView on X
  • Oct 1, 202611x their median

    La temporada 4 de 'Ted Lasso' es un lugar feliz, pero nos acaba de meter una de las mayores puñaladas traperas de toda la serie: "Se fue de la mejor manera" https://t.co/LEE4HeqJTh

    83003.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202610x their median

    Es uno de los 10 thrillers que hay que ver alguna vez en la vida. 53 años después, sigue siendo considerada una obra maestra del género https://t.co/unTQiYMzdO

    91005.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202610x their median

    Ridley Scott confirma que está reescribiendo la nueva película de 'Alien' después de haber visto 'Romulus': "Creo que necesitan algo de ayuda" https://t.co/cM6o6E4RHt

    42224.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 679K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 100 original posts, its engagement rate beats 2% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.6K times each, and 0.039% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.38% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 23% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 100 posts sampled, 96% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36 interactions, about 36x its own typical post.

What is Espinof's engagement rate on X?
Espinof (@espinof_com) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 100 original posts from the last 30 days against 679,079 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Espinof sits below the 10th percentile of the 212,270 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @espinof_com have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 2% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @espinof_com post?
Most posts go out around 12:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going