Back to @ericbolling's profile

🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸 engagement report

@ericbolling - 1.2M followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.007%
of 1.2M followers
Per impression
0.544%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
1.23%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
78
interactions (median)
Saved
0.007%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.87/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.544% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 1083x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 25, 2026. Recurring tag: #meangirl.

Compared with accounts its own size

🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸's engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 33% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.007%, 🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video78% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link22% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 78% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 22% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 110 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 14, 20261083x their median

    I can't believe this is real. The Chancellor of UC San Francisco testified under oath that a "vast majority of pregnancies are in women." Implying some pregnancies occur in men. When asked directly whether a non-biological woman has ever had a baby, he refused to answer. This is the head of one of the top medical schools in the country.

    56K15K4.3K2.0K3.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 3, 2026751x their median

    WHO DID THIS???🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/MspMDVnuCb

    39K11K1.0K580726K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 2026416x their median

    Real question and I don’t care who it pisses off, why should we vote for Republicans in November? Mass deportations aren’t happening. Most of us are single issue voters on immigration and DHS under Markwayne has decided they would rather appease CNN and MSNBC. Republicans won’t pass Save America, they won’t support the mass deportations we voted for. They haven’t done, frankly, jack shit outside of a tax cut extension. So why? Why push Maine to vote for Susan Collins? Because at least she’s not an admitted communist? In the end, though, what’s really the difference? Vote Republican, get Democrat policy anyway.

    19K3.0K6.4K6991.4M viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 2026109x their median

    “Just when I thought I was out… they pull me back in…” https://t.co/1AzRMPAEuc

    3.6K2833.5K7412.6M viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 202697x their median

    Peter showed up in style 😂 Our first preseason game is about to kick off @NFLonPrime https://t.co/LdRPoEGwA8

    6.8K2144601382.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 13, 202640x their median

    🚨EXCLUSIVE: Sen. Ron Johnson tells me he heard the newly released photo of Mitch McConnell may be an older image: “I just heard from some other source that was an older photo, so I really don’t know.” The American people deserve full transparency. https://t.co/9QnzfPS83z

    2.4K46712420101K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 202635x their median

    BREAKING: Katie Zacharia has been offered the White House press secretary role. It is not yet clear whether she has accepted the offer. https://t.co/4CDPZTLqzi

    2.1K22431542306K viewsView on X
  • Jul 12, 202635x their median

    Nancy Mace considering running for Lindsey Graham’s Senate seat https://t.co/efogF8oiGf

    1.3K2096784161.7M viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 202624x their median

    people don't even realize robinhood lost...

    1.4K40345101670K viewsView on X
  • Sep 26, 202616x their median

    The $DEBT won’t pay itself. https://t.co/f6zl21WCU9

    7224277910159K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#meangirl

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 78 interactions against 1.2M followers, an engagement rate of 0.007%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 29% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 0.544% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.23% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.87 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 78% carry an image or video, 22% are part of a thread and 22% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 77K interactions, about 1083x its own typical post.

What is 🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸's engagement rate on X?
🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸 (@ericbolling) has an engagement rate of 0.007%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 1,163,780 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.007%, 🇺🇸 ERIC BOLLING 🇺🇸 sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ericbolling have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 29% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ericbolling post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.87 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going