Back to @ericafett's profile

Erica Fett engagement report

@ericafett - 881K followers on X

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.038%
of 881K followers
Per impression
0.838%
40K views on a typical post
Reach
4.51%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
333
interactions (median)
Saved
0.015%
6 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.4/day
active 37% of days
Peak time
17:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 333 interactions against 881K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.838% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 228K interactions, about 1140x its own typical post.

Measured over 9 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 23, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Erica Fett's engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 43% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.038%, Erica Fett sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 17:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video44% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 44% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 236 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Feb 9, 20261140x their median

    someone genuinely explain to me how this could possibly be considered offensive or divisive to anyone https://t.co/4HV9WQzypY

    207K18K2.0K3312.9M viewsView on X
  • May 10, 202634x their median

    We are sad to learn that Japanese master of horror Koji Suzuki has passed away at 68. Koji Suzuki's nightmares defined an era of horror beginning in the '90s with THE RING, originally a Suzuki novel, and DARK WATER, based on a Suzuki short story. Rest in Peace, master. https://t.co/bTPEk98Fnx

    9.2K1.9K42142360K viewsView on X
  • Jun 24, 202625x their median

    Sunshine and bikinis ✨ https://t.co/Skr07j5uOG

    8.1K1881453107K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202614x their median

    Birthday girl 🩷 https://t.co/vVgmPiwWEJ

    4.3K118368552K viewsView on X
  • May 4, 202612x their median

    May the fourth be with you ✨ https://t.co/9fmOLvnUdv

    3.8K15871355K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 202610x their median

    Hello 💖 https://t.co/5Jy34G5MHn

    3.2K8561139K viewsView on X
  • Aug 28, 20263.0x their median

    People struggling to pay bills, buy groceries, thousands of people still without power or clean water- but yes- let's totally change the name of a Great Lake. Because that's an issue that's super important to prioritize.

    8916133341K viewsView on X
  • May 28, 20262.8x their median

    Very excited to announce I will be front page on Twitch on June 3rd from 12-8 pm EST! I'll be streaming @Warcraft and chatting about cryptids and folklore so come say hi! 🩷 https://t.co/6mIaNBXEAT

    809109185111K viewsView on X
  • Feb 9, 20262.6x their median

    It’s always funny when people get pissy with me when I’m outspoken. They were absolutely fine following me and enjoying my looks and personality for years, but the moment I speak up, suddenly I’m a whore that shows tits and ass. Like honey you’ve been following me since 2016 and now you want to weaponize what you were okay with all those years. But the moral of the story is, I do have great tits and ass

    8041050027K viewsView on X
  • Jun 29, 20261.8x their median

    Trying to get insanely cut so that I can cosplay Lara Croft at SDCC. Wish me luck 🤞

    567339139K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 333 interactions against 881K followers, an engagement rate of 0.038%. Measured over 9 original posts, its engagement rate beats 55% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 40K times each, and 0.838% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.4 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 9 posts sampled, 44% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 228K interactions, about 1140x its own typical post.

What is Erica Fett's engagement rate on X?
Erica Fett (@ericafett) has an engagement rate of 0.038%, based on the median interactions across 9 original posts from the last 30 days against 881,310 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.038%, Erica Fett sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ericafett have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 55% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ericafett post?
Most posts go out around 17:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.4 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going