Back to @eraserena's profile

Ana de Breuil engagement report

@eraserena - 93K followers on X

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Top quarter for its size
Per follower
0.418%
of 93K followers
Per impression
3.30%
12K views on a typical post
Reach
12.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
384
interactions (median)
Saved
0.026%
3 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.77/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
22:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 384 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.418%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 3.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 162x its own typical post.

Measured over 41 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Ana de Breuil's engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 75% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.418%, Ana de Breuil sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,261 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 22:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video12% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 12% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 156 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 18, 2026162x their median

    1970: "En el 2026 seguro tendremos autos voladores" El 2026: https://t.co/y4pXVSXZE8

    52K5.8K2.1K2.0K6.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202621x their median

    look at the fucking material this was SO slept on https://t.co/EaCOJuLx3A

    7.6K46028133843K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20269.3x their median

    Tip para la vida: a una pareja nueva jamás le cuenten demasiado de la anterior. Sean vagos, imprecisos, genéricos. No hace falta decir que amaron muchísimo ni que fue espectacular. La gente está loca y lo primero que hace es ir a buscar donde más le duele.

    3.4K10963987K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20268.3x their median

    Uds dicen que con esto llego a fin de mes? https://t.co/GONfBtbtzK

    2.9K4320626196K viewsView on X
  • Sep 20, 20268.1x their median

    Corrí la maratón de Buenos Aires. 4:11. Para ustedes seguramente una mierda; para mí, un tiempazo. La pasé genial, la ciudad es hermosa y no me duele nada. Bueno, sí: las 80 lucas que me cobró un taxista del Obelisco a Palermo. Vio el miedo en mis ojos y facturó. Merece fundirse.

    2.8K232734170K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20267.0x their median

    Acabo de ver fotos de un cumple de 42 y me parecen todas re viejas. Luego me acuerdo de que tengo esa edad y me surge la duda: ¿Soy yo sola la que se ve congelada en el tiempo? Porque no percibo el envejecimiento en mí pero en los demás lo veo clarísimo. A Uds les pasa?

    2.1K3252043228K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20264.8x their median

    Hay gente tan enamorada de sus problemas que la solución le resulta casi una falta de respeto. No quiere resolver nada: quiere seguir contando lo mal que está, pero con audiencia.

    1.5K255461325K viewsView on X
  • Aug 20, 20263.8x their median

    Para que no digan que sólo vine a desnudarme. https://t.co/EsyvS8yLDC

    1.3K5110147K viewsView on X
  • Aug 15, 20263.4x their median

    Tras casi diez días viajando, me queda una sola certeza: la presencia de la celeste y blanca en cualquier lado debería ser materia de estudio. Vas por donde sea y hay un hombre o un niño con la de Messi. No es nacionalismo rancio pero dudo que alguien supere eso.

    1.2K4631399K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.4x their median

    Entiendo la angustia de quedarse sin trabajo porque cerró la empresa o cambió el gobierno. Pero para el autónomo ese riesgo no pasa cada cuatro años: es todos los lunes. Los que trabajamos por cuenta propia vivimos en ese abismo, solo que aprendimos a caminar en la cornisa.

    1.1K7093850K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 384 interactions against 93K followers, an engagement rate of 0.418%. Measured over 41 original posts, its engagement rate beats 76% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 12K times each, and 3.30% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 41 posts sampled, 12% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 62K interactions, about 162x its own typical post.

What is Ana de Breuil's engagement rate on X?
Ana de Breuil (@eraserena) has an engagement rate of 0.418%, based on the median interactions across 41 original posts from the last 30 days against 92,579 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.418%, Ana de Breuil sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @eraserena have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 76% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @eraserena post?
Most posts go out around 22:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going