Back to @ensdomains's profile

ens.eth engagement report

@ensdomains - 261K followers on X

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.04%
of 261K followers
Per impression
1.15%
9.1K views on a typical post
Reach
3.46%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
104
interactions (median)
Saved
0.105%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.9/day
active 73% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 270 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post.

Measured over 18 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 24, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

ens.eth's engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 47% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.04%, ens.eth sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,956 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link28% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 28% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 231 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 25, 20262.6x their median

    .@Lighter_xyz has integrated ENS✨ Today, ENS names can be used on Lighter to simplify the withdrawal experience. https://t.co/TzdXLXmkVw

    2044317632K viewsView on X
  • Aug 24, 20262.4x their median

    A little gift to mark a new friendship @ensdomains 😉 https://t.co/jGTAEhPe9b

    1871745415K viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 20262.3x their median

    The @Binance ecosystem has extended ENS support. @BinanceWallet users can now send and receive assets with ENS names directly from the browser extension. If you don’t see the ENS feature, update the extension to the latest version (v1.20.0). https://t.co/wg7LwFaIu1

    15351241115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20261.8x their median

    Tokenized assets are moving beyond experiments and into real financial markets. As they spread across chains, exchanges, custodians, and lending protocols, the market needs a dependable way to identify what each token represents. ENS can provide that registry layer. https://t.co/xcV5wdGoIx

    1353113613K viewsView on X
  • Sep 14, 20261.7x their median

    ENS started as a way to make blockchain addresses readable. Today, the same namespace connects users, apps, agents, protocols, contracts, records, and chain metadata across 100+ chains. That’s how naming becomes coordination infrastructure. Read: https://t.co/NwzZbaX8n1 https://t.co/PggRlL8nQ7

    131291139.0K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026

    Registering an ENS name now takes one click. @gregskril walks through the simplified registration flow in the App, from picking your name to the payment options to the profile setup that happens instantly ⤵️ https://t.co/5ru0sID5Gp

    118237610K viewsView on X
  • Aug 27, 2026

    Your ENS profile is getting a lot more personal. ENS designer Ali walks through the new profile features in the App, from themes and records to the details that shape how your name shows up across the ecosystem ⤵️ https://t.co/XuOgg9cK4v

    12113529.2K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026

    ENSv2 makes the hierarchy of names explicit onchain. Instead of every name living in one flat registry, each name can define its own registry, resolver, and rules for the namespace below it. Learn more: https://t.co/VfxGjlmBPP https://t.co/9pDqYYXTL7

    10621748.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 2026

    The feature everyone’s been asking for is finally here. @gregskril walks through proactive notifications in the App, so you can track expiries, catch reminders, and renew before it’s too late ⤵️ https://t.co/xxEqUmubXu

    1041711311K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 2026

    The ENS Explorer is designed to be the source of truth for ENS. Names, ownership, resolvers, records, roles, history, and protocol configuration all come together in one place, so you can see how a name actually works. @jringenberg breaks it down ⤵️ https://t.co/eg0qqd4avC

    10319608.6K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 104 interactions against 261K followers, an engagement rate of 0.04%. Measured over 18 original posts, its engagement rate beats 43% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 9.1K times each, and 1.15% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.48% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.9 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 73% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 18 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video, 11% are part of a thread and 28% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 270 interactions, about 2.6x its own typical post.

What is ens.eth's engagement rate on X?
ens.eth (@ensdomains) has an engagement rate of 0.04%, based on the median interactions across 18 original posts from the last 30 days against 261,140 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.04%, ens.eth sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ensdomains have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 43% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ensdomains post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.9 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going