Back to @engadget's profile

Engadget engagement report

@engadget - 3.6M followers on X

Measured over 805 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 3.6M followers
Per impression
0.094%
9.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.26%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
9
interactions (median)
Saved
0.01%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
39.63/day
active 103% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 805 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 0.094% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.263% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 39.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 805 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 48% are part of a thread and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 443x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iphone, #appleiphoneduo, #iphoneduo.

Measured over 805 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 24, 2026. Recurring tags: #iphone, #appleiphoneduo, #iphoneduo.

Compared with accounts its own size

Engadget's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 6% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, Engadget sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video56% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link44% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 56% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 44% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 127 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 23, 2026443x their median

    Blackpink in your upper-facial area. https://t.co/kYgAwYYz7p

    2.7K1.3K121555K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 2026307x their median

    The iPhone 18 Pro has a smaller dynamic island but squeezes in one more live activity #AppleEvent2026 #iPhone18 #iPhone18Pro https://t.co/uC9R6IS1Ma

    2.6K1682711184K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 202656x their median

    iPhone 18 Pro vs iPhone 17 Pro heat management #iPhone #iPhone18 #iPhone18Pro https://t.co/Vs9ihz2kuK

    4732681131K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202655x their median

    Here’s how the iPhone 18 Pro’s variable aperture feature works #AppleEvent2026 #iPhone18 #iPhone18Pro https://t.co/nIt9VaA0l0

    449376495K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 202631x their median

    Sorry Apple, it looks like Meta's VR Glasses are the real Vision Pro successor. https://t.co/FsLO7AGFtR

    2392414255K viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 202620x their median

    Kindle Mode on the new Alexa tablets #Kindle #Alexa #Tablet https://t.co/mkSOzRACoG

    163114274K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202618x their median

    The Cosmos update is huge and 100 percent free. https://t.co/YaoWVYcQ9q

    15273040K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 202614x their median

    If you have a MacBook sitting around collecting dust, you can give it new life by turning it into a home NAS server. Here's how to get started. https://t.co/bwoYgyF5eg

    104134175K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202613x their median

    You can keep Instagram from using your activity outside the app to influence the ads you get. https://t.co/sz2ALfaOV3

    59749034K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202612x their median

    Even old Apple devices you haven't touched in years could still get you some credit towards a new phone. https://t.co/mw5lhrn0sq

    39365041K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#iphone#appleiphoneduo#iphoneduo#alexa#kindle

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 9 interactions against 3.6M followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 805 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 9.6K times each, and 0.094% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.263% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 39.6 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 805 posts sampled, 56% carry an image or video, 48% are part of a thread and 44% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 4.0K interactions, about 443x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #iphone, #appleiphoneduo, #iphoneduo.

What is Engadget's engagement rate on X?
Engadget (@engadget) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 805 original posts from the last 30 days against 3,647,995 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, Engadget sits below the 10th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @engadget have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @engadget post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 39.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going