Back to @engVid's profile

engVid engagement report

@engVid - 92K followers on X

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom quarter for its size
Per follower
0.006%
of 92K followers
Per impression
0.369%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
1.77%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
6
interactions (median)
Saved
0.061%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.6/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.369% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 1709x its own typical post.

Measured over 17 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 20, 2026. Recurring tag: #vocabulary.

Compared with accounts its own size

engVid's engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 19% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.006%, engVid sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video47% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link76% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 47% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 76% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 184 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 6, 20261709x their median

    It is permissible in English for a preposition to be what you end a sentence with. The idea that it should be avoided came from writers who were trying to align the language with Latin, but there is no reason to suggest ending a sentence with a preposition is wrong.

    8.9K814295202378K viewsView on X
  • Jun 6, 20262.7x their median

    Don't just say "SAID" all the time! In Rebecca's new lesson, learn 8 English verbs you can use instead, like "explained", "agreed", and more: https://t.co/BUGHGVXNqz

    132102.2K viewsView on X
  • May 16, 20262.3x their median

    What IS an adverb? How do you turn other words into adverbs? How do you pronounce the endings? Watch Ronnie's new beginner English grammar video: https://t.co/yJAN4aPRw5

    12200793 viewsView on X
  • Apr 26, 20262.0x their median

    When should you call someone "Mr." or "Ms." and when should you use their first name? What should you call your teacher? Your friends' parents? Learn all about titles in English with Emma's new lesson: https://t.co/04lVzHdESh

    9210825 viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20261.8x their median

    Do you know the difference between SAY, TELL, ASK, SPEAK, and TALK? Watch Emma's new video and learn with examples and easy explanations: https://t.co/D4yLhngrZ9

    110001.8K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 20261.5x their median

    "Sounds good." "Doubt it." "Kind of." Learn 20 two-word English expressions to agree and disagree in the new lesson from Adam! 👍👎 https://t.co/TgHqrXIwIx

    72001.8K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20261.5x their median

    Different countries call it RUBBISH, GARBAGE, or TRASH. Which should you use? Watch Ronnie's new video on TRASHY vocabulary: https://t.co/NTuAAWM70s 🗑️

    90002.0K viewsView on X
  • Jun 16, 20261.5x their median

    Are you a master of TIME TRAVEL? 🌀⏳ Learn the difference between "have", "have had", "had had", and "will have had" in the new grammar lesson from James: https://t.co/4yp24xyJhX

    9000804 viewsView on X
  • Jun 2, 20261.5x their median

    "I see." "I think." "I think so." Learn 6 short and easy responses English speakers use in everyday conversation! Watch the new video from Emma: https://t.co/DGaXBK4aNG

    8100790 viewsView on X
  • May 9, 20261.5x their median

    James asked for your questions. Watch the new video for his answers! This Q&A covers grammar basics, speaking confidence, job interview preparation, and more: https://t.co/KtjMJk6UFE

    7200667 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#vocabulary

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 6 interactions against 92K followers, an engagement rate of 0.006%. Measured over 17 original posts, its engagement rate beats 14% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.369% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.6 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 17 posts sampled, 47% carry an image or video, 6% are part of a thread and 76% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 10K interactions, about 1709x its own typical post.

What is engVid's engagement rate on X?
engVid (@engVid) has an engagement rate of 0.006%, based on the median interactions across 17 original posts from the last 30 days against 91,920 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.006%, engVid sits above the 10th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @engVid have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 14% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @engVid post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.6 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going