EliZ engagement report
@eliz883 - 609K followers on X
Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 510 interactions against 609K followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 0.777% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post.
Measured over 70 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 8, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
EliZ's engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 41% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.084%, EliZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 43% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 43% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 169 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 31, 20264.4x their median
dark truth about trading no one tells you: > out of 429k traders on fomo, 24k traders (5%) are in profit > only 500 traders have made more than $1k ever > majority have just profited $100 or less > and 95% of the traders are in a loss youre trying to compete for that 1% spot guys stop burning your money
- Oct 7, 20263.7x their median
😂 https://t.co/Jgsda2YhwQ
- Sep 4, 20263.6x their median
$TAO $NEAR $LINK $SUI
- Sep 6, 20263.3x their median
Bought more $TAO 110k https://t.co/2Y7Zt0MZ0b
- Sep 7, 20263.1x their median
You should have a look at this and share it https://t.co/l034h4IfEh
- Sep 7, 20262.9x their median
If you want more alpha, you need to get going with the ‘like’ buttons and interactions
- Oct 4, 20262.6x their median
Big runner soon https://t.co/2Jr6KDlVPG
- Feb 8, 20262.8x their median
$NPC Behind this meme, I see a very active community and genuine interest that continues to remain constant over time. For this very reason, a possible accumulation phase at the lower end of the range would become extremely interesting. If the price manages to stabilise and build structure at those levels, we would have a configuration almost mirroring the top formed months ago: a symmetry that often precedes cleaner directional movements. In other words, I am not chasing the price. I prefer to see if the market accepts those low levels and builds a base — because that is where the risk is better defined and the R/R becomes really favourable. Let's see if the market will give us this opportunity. If it does not, I will wait for a bullish flip in the 0.01 area on the monthly chart.
- Oct 4, 20262.5x their median
$FET Let it set, and then it’ll burst
- Sep 17, 20262.4x their median
$FET remains very interesting on the weekly chart. It’s consolidating above a key support zone and below the main resistance at $0.274, building a structure similar to 2023. If it breaks and consolidates above that level, we could see a strong expansion. Let’s see how it develops—I remain bullish.
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 510 interactions against 609K followers, an engagement rate of 0.084%. Measured over 70 original posts, its engagement rate beats 68% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 66K times each, and 0.777% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 10.8% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 50% of days. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 70 posts sampled, 43% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.2K interactions, about 4.4x its own typical post.
- What is EliZ's engagement rate on X?
- EliZ (@eliz883) has an engagement rate of 0.084%, based on the median interactions across 70 original posts from the last 30 days against 608,526 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.084%, EliZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @eliz883 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 68% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @eliz883 post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.13 posts per day across the measured window.