EliZ engagement report
@eliz883 - 607K followers on X
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 484 interactions against 607K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 0.802% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.
Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on August 26, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
EliZ's engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 46% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.08%, EliZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.012% to 0.081%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.012% |
| 50th percentile | 0.081% |
| 75th percentile | 0.439% |
| 90th percentile | 2.10% |
| 99th percentile | 158.1% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 52K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 51K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 55K |
| 04:00 UTC | -6% | 44K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 43K |
| 06:00 UTC | -4% | 50K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 54K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 62K |
| 09:00 UTC | -3% | 72K |
| 10:00 UTC | -2% | 74K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 81K |
| 12:00 UTC | -2% | 89K |
| 13:00 UTC | -2% | 98K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 101K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 104K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 102K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 94K |
| 18:00 UTC | -1% | 88K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 83K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 77K |
| 21:00 UTC | -1% | 68K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 59K |
| 23:00 UTC | -2% | 53K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 237K |
| Monday | 0% | 300K |
| Tuesday | -3% | 299K |
| Wednesday | -1% | 256K |
| Thursday | -1% | 249K |
| Friday | -3% | 258K |
| Saturday | +3% | 232K |
Best tweets
- Feb 8, 20262.7x their median
$NPC Behind this meme, I see a very active community and genuine interest that continues to remain constant over time. For this very reason, a possible accumulation phase at the lower end of the range would become extremely interesting. If the price manages to stabilise and build structure at those levels, we would have a configuration almost mirroring the top formed months ago: a symmetry that often precedes cleaner directional movements. In other words, I am not chasing the price. I prefer to see if the market accepts those low levels and builds a base — because that is where the risk is better defined and the R/R becomes really favourable. Let's see if the market will give us this opportunity. If it does not, I will wait for a bullish flip in the 0.01 area on the monthly chart.
- Aug 23, 20262.5x their median
Retweet and like 😊 This is the best daily low that a pattern can give you to spot invalidations and achieve a perfect risk-reward. https://t.co/2IyDwxobcE
- Jul 28, 20262.2x their median
Retweet this to show others what it means to invest sensibly $TAO I’m not the slightest bit worried about my spot position. As you know, I’m sticking with it and have no intention of changing my strategy until I have concrete reasons to do so. For me, there’s no middle ground with this investment: I’ve allocated a portion of my portfolio that I’m prepared to see go down to zero, in exchange for the chance of a 10x–20x return. That’s the difference between investing and trading. In trading, you manage risk, stop-losses and timing. In investing, on the other hand, you accept volatility by following a long-term plan, without being swayed by short-term fluctuations. If the project succeeds, the potential return will more than compensate for the risk taken. If, on the other hand, it fails, the loss was already factored in from day one. This is what it means to invest with discipline.
- Aug 23, 20262.1x their median
I wanted to give you a tip: when, after a significant pump, you see a flash dump caused by liquidations — like the one yesterday — an excellent spot buying opportunity often arises. The risk is very simple to manage: invalidation only comes with a daily close below the low of the flash dump candle. This way you have a contained risk and a very interesting potential risk/reward ratio. Don't be put off by the violence of the move: that's often precisely where the best trade comes from. The only challenge is being present and clear-headed when it happens.
- Aug 22, 20261.8x their median
$LINK is showing an interesting breakout. If it provides a solid retest with confirmation, I'll return as a buyer to try to catch the next leg up. https://t.co/rQbZqNvbXa
- Aug 22, 20261.5x their median
$NEAR nice deviation in play What do you think ? https://t.co/PxUxDZedZx
- Aug 23, 2026
Work on ranges in the lower timeframes, especially H1, focusing on deviations from the range's highs and lows. Scalp long in long season and scalp short in short season https://t.co/wuNAsisYHA
- Aug 25, 2026
Many monthly patterns are genuinely interesting, and a potential rebound in the coming weeks could present us with set-ups featuring very clear invalidation levels and huge risk-reward ratios. We just need to work out how BTC will react in the 85–90 range: if the rally stops there and the price begins to consolidate, many altcoins could easily rise 2–3 times in value. If, on the other hand, we see a monthly reclaim of 100K followed by a fresh decline towards the lows, the scenario will change completely. It is precisely this reaction that will reveal the near future of altcoins, but for now everything looks fantastic and decidedly favourable for us.
- Aug 24, 2026
$BTC 👌🏻 https://t.co/udbZimb9pE
- Aug 21, 2026
$FET higher now
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 484 interactions against 607K followers, an engagement rate of 0.08%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 67% of 3,882 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 60K times each, and 0.802% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 9.94% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 59% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 1.3K interactions, about 2.7x its own typical post.
- What is EliZ's engagement rate on X?
- EliZ (@eliz883) has an engagement rate of 0.08%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 607,161 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.08%, EliZ sits above the 25th percentile of the 37,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @eliz883 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 67% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (3,882 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @eliz883 post?
- Most posts go out around 08:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.5 posts per day across the measured window.