Back to @elejercitodelam's profile

ElEjercitoDeLAM engagement report

@elejercitodelam - 730K followers on X

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.055%
of 730K followers
Per impression
0.871%
46K views on a typical post
Reach
6.33%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
402
interactions (median)
Saved
0.065%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.77/day
active 33% of days
Peak time
00:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 402 interactions against 730K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 0.871% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 34x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lam, #chupenlam.

Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #lam, #chupenlam.

Compared with accounts its own size

ElEjercitoDeLAM's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.055%, ElEjercitoDeLAM sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,880 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 00:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video98% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 24, 202634x their median

    Pampita por el posteo de la china https://t.co/SMHYAYeW2h

    14K1514321316K viewsView on X
  • Sep 11, 202624x their median

    Me llamaron “gordofóbica” en televisión. No dijeron que hice un comentario que consideraban desafortunado. No cuestionaron una frase. Me definieron a mí. Y no es lo mismo. Puedo equivocarme. Puedo expresarme mal. Puedo elegir una palabra que no represente exactamente lo que quiero decir. Y, como cualquier persona, puedo aceptar una crítica cuando corresponde. Pero NO SOY GORDOFÓBICA. Y me duele que alguien pueda colocarme semejante etiqueta públicamente, frente a una audiencia enorme, sin detenerse siquiera a mirar quién soy, qué he dicho y cómo me he comportado durante todos estos años. Llevo más de 20 años trabajando y hablando frente a una cámara. He discutido muchísimo. Me he peleado. He dicho cosas de las que después pude arrepentirme e incluso disculparme. Me han dicho de todo y yo también he contestado con dureza. Entonces, si soy gordofóbica, busquen mi historia. Busquen durante estos más de 20 años cuántas veces humillé a una persona por ser gorda. Busquen cuándo utilicé el peso de una mujer para degradarla. Busquen cuándo dije que una persona valía menos, era menos linda, menos capaz o merecía menos respeto por el tamaño de su cuerpo. BÚSQUENLO. Porque yo también quise saber si existía ese historial que aparentemente justifica que hoy se me defina de esa manera. Y no lo encontré. Lo que sí existe es una frase. Una frase en la que intenté hablar de algo completamente diferente: de la mirada del afuera, de cómo creo que muchas veces la sociedad juzga de manera distinta a las personas según su apariencia. ¿Me expresé mal? Es posible. ¿La frase pudo herir o molestar a alguien? También. Y si alguien se sintió lastimado por mis palabras, puedo entenderlo y lamentarlo. Pero una cosa es responsabilizarme por cómo me expresé y otra muy distinta es aceptar que alguien decida quién soy. NO. No voy a aceptar una etiqueta que no me representa. Porque llamar públicamente “gordofóbica” a una persona es una acusación seria. Y las acusaciones serias deberían sostenerse con algo más que la interpretación de una frase. Si después de más de dos décadas de exposición pública el argumento para definir quién soy sigue siendo aquel mismo comentario, entonces quizás no estamos frente a un patrón de gordofobia. Quizás estamos frente a una frase desafortunada. Y esas dos cosas NO SON LO MISMO. Estoy absolutamente a favor de que revisemos nuestras palabras, de que aprendamos y de que entendamos que hay expresiones que hoy pueden lastimar aunque ésa jamás haya sido nuestra intención. Pero esa responsabilidad tiene que funcionar para todos. También para quienes tienen un micrófono. También para quienes comunican. También para quienes ponen etiquetas sobre otras personas delante de millones de espectadores. Porque las palabras tienen consecuencias de los dos lados de la pantalla. No pretendo que nadie deje de criticarme. Después de tantos años en televisión sería absurdo. Lo único que exijo es algo mucho más sencillo: QUE ME JUZGUEN POR LO QUE DIJE. NO POR ALGO QUE DECIDIERON QUE SOY. Puedo aceptar haberme equivocado con una frase. Lo que no voy a aceptar es que una frase equivocada se convierta en una mentira sobre quién soy. Eliana Guercio.

    5.6K4663.3K163396K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202620x their median

    Pincoya llora por el favoritismo con Yipio https://t.co/Z13H0smVGn

    5.9K1.0K773112140K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202619x their median

    "No tiras una primicia hace 30 años" le tira Guercio a Ubfal. #LAM https://t.co/RPRGAOJo9u

    6.8K43829330115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202616x their median

    EL COLMO DEL COLMO. Audio que se filtra en GH https://t.co/quJtyh9HQu

    5.2K823511101519K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 202615x their median

    Yipio: Hay Marcas poniendo plata por mi. No lo se Rick... https://t.co/CmPLc0tAGi

    4.5K88231287143K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202614x their median

    Jajajajajajajajajaja meten comunicado estos 2 que cortaron 😂 https://t.co/xDDzVN3yhO

    5.4K8120466901K viewsView on X
  • Sep 25, 202614x their median

    Moria mirando a Moyano en la entrevista https://t.co/NmcHELLPwL

    5.3K204431468K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202612x their median

    La ex de Tyago PZK se mete en el baul para esquivar UNA nota. Que valor https://t.co/UnZGfHE37y

    4.6K427023505K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202611x their median

    Que largo todo https://t.co/UQKPFAef88

    3.8K1972963886K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#lam#chupenlam

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 402 interactions against 730K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 0.871% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 34x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lam, #chupenlam.

What is ElEjercitoDeLAM's engagement rate on X?
ElEjercitoDeLAM (@elejercitodelam) has an engagement rate of 0.055%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 730,150 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.055%, ElEjercitoDeLAM sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @elejercitodelam have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @elejercitodelam post?
Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going