ElEjercitoDeLAM engagement report
@elejercitodelam - 730K followers on X
Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 402 interactions against 730K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 0.871% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 34x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lam, #chupenlam.
Measured over 65 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #lam, #chupenlam.
Compared with accounts its own size
ElEjercitoDeLAM's engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 44% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.055%, ElEjercitoDeLAM sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 98% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -3% | -3% to -2% | 54K |
- 98% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 113 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 24, 202634x their median
Pampita por el posteo de la china https://t.co/SMHYAYeW2h
- Sep 11, 202624x their median
Me llamaron “gordofóbica” en televisión. No dijeron que hice un comentario que consideraban desafortunado. No cuestionaron una frase. Me definieron a mí. Y no es lo mismo. Puedo equivocarme. Puedo expresarme mal. Puedo elegir una palabra que no represente exactamente lo que quiero decir. Y, como cualquier persona, puedo aceptar una crítica cuando corresponde. Pero NO SOY GORDOFÓBICA. Y me duele que alguien pueda colocarme semejante etiqueta públicamente, frente a una audiencia enorme, sin detenerse siquiera a mirar quién soy, qué he dicho y cómo me he comportado durante todos estos años. Llevo más de 20 años trabajando y hablando frente a una cámara. He discutido muchísimo. Me he peleado. He dicho cosas de las que después pude arrepentirme e incluso disculparme. Me han dicho de todo y yo también he contestado con dureza. Entonces, si soy gordofóbica, busquen mi historia. Busquen durante estos más de 20 años cuántas veces humillé a una persona por ser gorda. Busquen cuándo utilicé el peso de una mujer para degradarla. Busquen cuándo dije que una persona valía menos, era menos linda, menos capaz o merecía menos respeto por el tamaño de su cuerpo. BÚSQUENLO. Porque yo también quise saber si existía ese historial que aparentemente justifica que hoy se me defina de esa manera. Y no lo encontré. Lo que sí existe es una frase. Una frase en la que intenté hablar de algo completamente diferente: de la mirada del afuera, de cómo creo que muchas veces la sociedad juzga de manera distinta a las personas según su apariencia. ¿Me expresé mal? Es posible. ¿La frase pudo herir o molestar a alguien? También. Y si alguien se sintió lastimado por mis palabras, puedo entenderlo y lamentarlo. Pero una cosa es responsabilizarme por cómo me expresé y otra muy distinta es aceptar que alguien decida quién soy. NO. No voy a aceptar una etiqueta que no me representa. Porque llamar públicamente “gordofóbica” a una persona es una acusación seria. Y las acusaciones serias deberían sostenerse con algo más que la interpretación de una frase. Si después de más de dos décadas de exposición pública el argumento para definir quién soy sigue siendo aquel mismo comentario, entonces quizás no estamos frente a un patrón de gordofobia. Quizás estamos frente a una frase desafortunada. Y esas dos cosas NO SON LO MISMO. Estoy absolutamente a favor de que revisemos nuestras palabras, de que aprendamos y de que entendamos que hay expresiones que hoy pueden lastimar aunque ésa jamás haya sido nuestra intención. Pero esa responsabilidad tiene que funcionar para todos. También para quienes tienen un micrófono. También para quienes comunican. También para quienes ponen etiquetas sobre otras personas delante de millones de espectadores. Porque las palabras tienen consecuencias de los dos lados de la pantalla. No pretendo que nadie deje de criticarme. Después de tantos años en televisión sería absurdo. Lo único que exijo es algo mucho más sencillo: QUE ME JUZGUEN POR LO QUE DIJE. NO POR ALGO QUE DECIDIERON QUE SOY. Puedo aceptar haberme equivocado con una frase. Lo que no voy a aceptar es que una frase equivocada se convierta en una mentira sobre quién soy. Eliana Guercio.
- Aug 29, 202620x their median
Pincoya llora por el favoritismo con Yipio https://t.co/Z13H0smVGn
- Aug 31, 202619x their median
"No tiras una primicia hace 30 años" le tira Guercio a Ubfal. #LAM https://t.co/RPRGAOJo9u
- Sep 9, 202616x their median
EL COLMO DEL COLMO. Audio que se filtra en GH https://t.co/quJtyh9HQu
- Aug 31, 202615x their median
Yipio: Hay Marcas poniendo plata por mi. No lo se Rick... https://t.co/CmPLc0tAGi
- Sep 9, 202614x their median
Jajajajajajajajajaja meten comunicado estos 2 que cortaron 😂 https://t.co/xDDzVN3yhO
- Sep 25, 202614x their median
Moria mirando a Moyano en la entrevista https://t.co/NmcHELLPwL
- Sep 9, 202612x their median
La ex de Tyago PZK se mete en el baul para esquivar UNA nota. Que valor https://t.co/UnZGfHE37y
- Sep 10, 202611x their median
Que largo todo https://t.co/UQKPFAef88
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 402 interactions against 730K followers, an engagement rate of 0.055%. Measured over 65 original posts, its engagement rate beats 61% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 46K times each, and 0.871% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 6.32% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.8 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 33% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 65 posts sampled, 98% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 14K interactions, about 34x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #lam, #chupenlam.
- What is ElEjercitoDeLAM's engagement rate on X?
- ElEjercitoDeLAM (@elejercitodelam) has an engagement rate of 0.055%, based on the median interactions across 65 original posts from the last 30 days against 730,150 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.055%, ElEjercitoDeLAM sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,880 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @elejercitodelam have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 61% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @elejercitodelam post?
- Most posts go out around 00:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.77 posts per day across the measured window.