Back to @econ_enterprise's profile

Economist Enterprise engagement report

@econ_enterprise - 238K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0.001%
of 238K followers
Per impression
0.124%
1.6K views on a typical post
Reach
0.68%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
2
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.47/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
15:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.124% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.678% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Economist Enterprise's engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 7% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.001%, Economist Enterprise sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.6%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,258 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,968 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.6%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 15:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video86% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 86% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 402 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 202611x their median

    90% of people say they feel safe in their day-to-day road travel. Only 45% of the transport professionals who design, build &operate mobility systems agree. Our new research, supported by @BremboBrakes, explores why and what it will take to close the gap https://t.co/glCYHAB3wS https://t.co/TAxFhhrC7M

    133506.2K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 20267.0x their median

    Where investment goes today will shape who produces, supplies, innovates and trades tomorrow. In a new blog post, @CollinsNan, Director, Division on Investment and Enterprise @UNCTAD, highlights a shift revealed by the World Investment Report 2026: global capital is becoming more strategic, selective and concentrated. To stay connected to future trade networks, developing economies should focus on realistic entry points—such as processing, logistics and digital services. Read more: https://t.co/jzWMCOi24E

    84112.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20265.5x their median

    Which cities are the most liveable in 2026? Launching today, our Global Liveability Index 2026, benchmarking 173 cities across stability, healthcare, culture, education and infrastructure. While the global average score held steady at 76.1, the data reveals shifts beneath the surface as geopolitics, healthcare investments, and safety trends reshape the global landscape. Read the key insights here: https://t.co/oxsjCrR1hg

    46101.5K viewsView on X
  • Jul 27, 20265.0x their median

    In this week's newsletter: Our report, supported by @Bayer, explores how self-care can be effectively integrated into national health systems. https://t.co/fpObFLy6Cl

    91003.9K viewsView on X
  • Jul 16, 20264.0x their median

    Global democracy has stopped its eight-year decline. But for business leaders, this is a moment to stay alert, not reassured. EIU's Democracy Index 2025, reveals that the global democracy scores have stabilised after eight consecutive years of decline, yet operational risks for multinational corporations remain incredibly volatile. There is no longer a single global political risk environment. Markets are fragmenting. Surface stability can easily mask underlying friction that threatens your operations. Read the full breakdown and download the summary report here: https://t.co/JjfyZaJ92Z

    52101.8K viewsView on X
  • Jul 2, 20264.0x their median

    "The world’s food systems are functional until they aren’t. Recent volatility in energy markets, which has increased transport and refrigeration costs, alongside weather extremes linked to El Niño, illustrates how quickly external shocks can expose underlying weaknesses across the food system." In a new op-ed for @TheGrocer, Pratima Singh, Initiative lead, The Food Imperative and principal at Economist Enterprise, breaks down a critical blind spot threatening global food security. Read the full article: https://t.co/B6VDdB07XO

    62001.6K viewsView on X
  • Jul 29, 20263.5x their median

    When strengthening Britain’s economic security, we focus too much on what to build next and too little on what we already have. In a recent guest blog, George Middleton, Director of MAP UK & International and co-chair of Critical Supply Group, highlights key insights from the UK Supply Report 2026. He notes that the UK doesn't need to rebuild everything from scratch; it needs to better recognise, connect and deploy the capability it already owns. https://t.co/x8bxEOg6un

    51101.7K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 20263.5x their median

    The Resilient Food Systems Index (RFSI), supported by @Cargill, has been shortlisted for the World Media Group Awards in the Specialist Category: Social Good. In an increasingly volatile risk landscape, how do we ensure long-term food security? The RFSI provides a benchmark, evaluating countries' capacity to produce and deliver sufficient, affordable and nutritious food. By focusing on structural and forward-looking factors, it provides a practical tool to inform policy, guide investment and drive action toward more stable, sustainable food systems. Explore the RFSI: https://t.co/p5O5ufz68F

    61001.6K viewsView on X
  • Jun 10, 20263.5x their median

    Can we ensure that a fractured trade system still supports development and inclusive growth? Or are we entering a period of permanent marginalisation for smaller economies? In her latest analysis, @luzmadelamora, @UNCTAD, highlights a critical shift: trade is no longer just about efficiency; it’s now a tool for national security. https://t.co/FTDKtX41C7

    24011.3K viewsView on X
  • Jul 31, 20263.0x their median

    Almost 90% of people support stronger safety measures: lower speed limits, greater enforcement, higher standards. The public mandate is there. What is missing is the regulatory and industry coordination to act on it. https://t.co/ExYgpRJxp9 Supported by @BremboBrakes https://t.co/5wqahzYYrW

    51003.0K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 2 interactions against 238K followers, an engagement rate of 0.001%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 1.6K times each, and 0.124% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.678% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.47 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 86% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 21 interactions, about 11x its own typical post.

What is Economist Enterprise's engagement rate on X?
Economist Enterprise (@econ_enterprise) has an engagement rate of 0.001%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 238,324 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.001%, Economist Enterprise sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,258 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @econ_enterprise have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @econ_enterprise post?
Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going