Back to @ecd_'s profile

Confidencial Digital engagement report

@ecd_ - 112K followers on X

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 112K followers
Per impression
0%
632 views on a typical post
Reach
0.57%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
0
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 13% of days
Peak time
05:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 112K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 632 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.566% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.

Measured over 40 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Confidencial Digital's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0%, Confidencial Digital sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,374 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,897 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 05:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video0% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link100% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 0% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 140 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Oct 8, 2026

    La Guardia Civil va a ampliar los casos en los que retirará el arma a los agentes para prevenir suicidios 👇 https://t.co/POEqylnyyZ

    4100737 viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    Sofía Suescun vuelve a concursar de la mano de Netflix en ‘Plex: La Última Llamada’, el nuevo formato presentado por Plex que ya se graba en República Dominicana, en la misma zona en la que se rueda ‘La isla de las tent... https://t.co/06fcZgbbHk

    3000685 viewsView on X
  • Oct 8, 2026

    “¿Dónde está el Gobierno progresista?”. La muerte de Mari Carmen enciende la rabia entre los acampados de Sol 👇 https://t.co/Fyf6KmIUWB

    2010568 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    Habla el entorno de Zapatero: el expresidente no va a participar en la campaña electoral 👇 https://t.co/hKVLOQlBi7

    00201.2K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    🚀  La victoria judicial de Silvia Intxaurrondo frente a RTVE no ha cerrado el caso. La Corporación ha recurrido la sentencia que reconoce a la presentadora una retribución cercana a los 254.000 euros y el enfrentamiento... https://t.co/9QbFzMRH7u

    1100453 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    🚀  Jorge Javier Vázquez ha roto su silencio para anunciar que vuelve después de un tiempo de descanso. Lo ha hecho con un mensaje explosivo en el que promete regresar “a la guerra”, aunque se guarda el dato que todos qu... https://t.co/JFNE5EaE2G

    1001502 viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    Llamadas anónimas a números personales preguntando qué van a votar en las elecciones 👇 https://t.co/upE5OOaLnp

    1100701 viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    El despacho de abogados de Jesulín y Campanario busca un experto en honor antes de demandar a Belén Esteban 👇 https://t.co/q6CERRdHyb

    20001.3K viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2026

    🚀  Brad Pitt presenta ‘En el corazón de la bestia’ en San Sebastián y explica qué papel tuvieron sus seres queridos en sus momentos más difíciles. https://t.co/Fc31bWRHHw

    1010653 viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 2026

    Un encontronazo en la vía pública entre un sargento de la Guardia Civil y una patrulla de la Policía Local de Mieres, en Asturias, ha desembocado en una sanción disciplinaria para el suboficial. https://t.co/ZTTNnCI6Z3

    0010540 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 112K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 40 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 632 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.566% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 40 posts sampled, 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5 interactions.

What is Confidencial Digital's engagement rate on X?
Confidencial Digital (@ecd_) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 40 original posts from the last 30 days against 111,614 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0%, Confidencial Digital sits below the 10th percentile of the 205,374 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @ecd_ have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @ecd_ post?
Most posts go out around 05:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going