Eugene Kaspersky engagement report
@e_kaspersky - 178K followers on X
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 178K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 105 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #icloud, #macos, #macsync. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 17, 2026. Recurring tags: #icloud, #macos, #macsync.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.025%, Eugene Kaspersky sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,956 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.142%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.142% |
| 75th percentile | 0.674% |
| 90th percentile | 2.54% |
| 99th percentile | 82.5% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | +15% | +14% to +16% | 32K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 311 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Aug 4, 20262.3x their median
Threat actors are increasingly exploiting legitimate cloud services like Cloudflare Workers, Vercel, Netlify, GitHub Pages, and IPFS to evade detection and streamline the deployment of the scam infrastructure. We analyze the mechanics of a real-life adversary-in-the-middle (AitM) attack in a cloud and share detailed statistics on the platforms and domains phishers abuse most frequently 👉 https://t.co/50VSnAwNoF
- Jul 28, 20262.2x their median
Here’s some research into new malware used by the Mirage Kitten APT, which is targeting the aerospace, aviation, defense, and telecommunications sectors across the Middle East and Africa. The toolset includes a new Windows backdoor and two custom WebSocket-based tunnelers. Details: https://t.co/9yayYBBcrW
- Aug 14, 20261.9x their median
HoneyMyte (a.k.a. Mustang Panda) upgrades CoolClient: the backdoor gets a kernel-level Windows rootkit 👉 https://t.co/wnirXVoPlW https://t.co/vjIJ9JO6B2
- Sep 2, 20261.6x their median
The Mirage Kitten APT’s toolkit is evolving: we’re exploring its two previously undocumented cross-platform RATs – NodeRabbit and PollCat – that are targeting aviation and FinTech sectors across the Middle East and Africa. Spear-phishing (fake recruiters and trojanized coding challenges) is the key attack vector. These RATs mark the group's first documented use of Node.js/JavaScript malware. Full analysis: https://t.co/nnvf1gxYeT
- Jul 22, 20261.6x their median
HelloNet: a new APT campaign abusing the ViPNet update system to deploy malicious modules. The toolset includes a DLL sideloader, a hidden proxy, and a Rust-based backdoor – active since May 2026. Details: https://t.co/JX56RIOmC6 https://t.co/9affRU7CRC
- Jul 21, 20261.5x their median
A new module in the sophisticated cyberespionage framework, Project CAV3RN, is hiding C2 commands inside Outlook calendar events scheduled for 2050 via Microsoft Graph. Details: https://t.co/znAyClSpbE https://t.co/myyIXuhIve
- Aug 31, 2026
A while ago we were tasked to analyze a file with an initial classification as adware. A deeper research turned up suspicious network activity - the sample did far more than serve ads. In fact, its advertising functionality doesn’t even work; instead, it triggers an infection chain that delivers the ValleyRAT backdoor. More details 👉 https://t.co/O9gjknTxdP
- Jul 23, 2026
GoSerpent: a Go-based RAT targeting government and diplomatic entities in Southeast Asia since 2021 is now deploying coordinated tools for silent file collection, credential dumping, and staged exfiltration. Details: https://t.co/Xi7hD8fMkU https://t.co/0djfZodQlP
- Aug 21, 2026
An in-depth research of the malware spread through the built-in updaters of Android-based automotive head unit firmware. This is the first documented case of malware found on a car head unit with an infection chain specific to that type of device. 👉 https://t.co/G0xYchaFTF https://t.co/WLP4NASxHo
- Sep 23, 2026
Hiding your Wi-Fi network name might seem like a smart security move, but in practice it does more harm than good. Let’s take a look at how it works, what side effects it can have, and how to properly secure your home Wi-Fi 👉 https://t.co/gB6FaccpRd https://t.co/xe3FmNU6PK
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 45 interactions against 178K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Posts are seen about 3.7K times each, and 1.22% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.07% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.13 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 13% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 105 interactions, about 2.3x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #icloud, #macos, #macsync. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Eugene Kaspersky's engagement rate on X?
- Eugene Kaspersky (@e_kaspersky) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 178,405 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.025%, Eugene Kaspersky sits above the 25th percentile of the 202,956 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @e_kaspersky have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @e_kaspersky post?
- Most posts go out around 11:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.13 posts per day across the measured window.