EMARKETER engagement report
@eMarketer - 264K followers on X
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 264K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 976 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34 interactions. Recurring topics include #emarketersummit, #futureofdigital, #ai.
Measured over 37 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 8, 2026. Recurring tags: #emarketersummit, #futureofdigital, #ai.
Compared with accounts its own size
EMARKETER's engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 0% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0%, EMARKETER sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.016%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.002% |
| 25th percentile | 0.016% |
| 50th percentile | 0.1% |
| 75th percentile | 0.499% |
| 90th percentile | 2.09% |
| 99th percentile | 119.9% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 97% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 100% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 97% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 100% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
- Its average post runs 275 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Mar 3, 2025
🗣️The wait is over...AI Search is here! Designed to navigate EMARKETER's extensive content, AI Search cuts your research time from hours to minutes and delivers context-driven answers that integrate seamlessly into your workflow. See AI Search in action: https://t.co/ZmbL6eoG08 https://t.co/EgRsUEZ0pZ
- Aug 10, 2026
A strong AI visibility strategy starts with understanding where your brand stands. These five questions will help you get there: https://t.co/OoYlFA27Pg #AIVisibility #AIVisibilityIndex #AIVI https://t.co/mElR9UKsae
- Aug 21, 2026
Something new is coming to EMARKETER PRO+... We’re introducing three new offerings to help your team incorporate thousands of vetted and proprietary data into their preferred AI workflow and help align strategies and validate decisions. Learn more: https://t.co/X3VPtnU7IU https://t.co/Et5Rdi3Ug3
- Aug 12, 2026
👟 We welcomed Buddy Teaster, President and CEO of @Soles4Souls, and Kelly Cobb, VP of Impact at @BOMBAS, to the Reimagining Retail podcast today! Hear them discuss what purpose looks like in practice: https://t.co/C6QV0xJzHm Made possible by @Awin_US #Soles4Souls #Bombas https://t.co/CwxBZqKuYV
- Sep 4, 2026
In today’s podcast episode, we discuss the main takeaways from #Meta’s landmark trial over kids and social media addiction, the safety features it plans to roll out, and what could change as a result. Tune in: https://t.co/PgCuTTdqus Made possible by @verve_inc https://t.co/hLDc75TmmA
- Sep 3, 2026
Commerce media ad spending will reach $83.71 billion in the US this year, according to our June 2026 forecast. Learn what industry leaders see ahead—and how your #commercemedia strategy can keep pace. https://t.co/pS1QQj3D6D https://t.co/VPKGbvbr0X
- Aug 20, 2026
Why is AI visibility so hard to measure? Michelle Lakov, Sr Dir, Product Marketing, and Daniel Flynn, Sr Dir, AI Visibility, Measurement, break down why measuring AI visibility is so complex and what marketers need to understand as they adapt to GEO: https://t.co/LS1OjBPZfw https://t.co/BHFa1t1OXK
- Aug 17, 2026
"...you can rank number one in traditional search and be completely absent from the AI answer." 👉 Watch the full video to learn more about EMARKETER’s AI Visibility Index: https://t.co/23RBP8p8kf #AI #AIVI #AIVisibility #AIVisibilityIndex https://t.co/AGENDQYtZj
- Aug 14, 2026
Our new analyst report, “Holiday Shopping 2026,” compliments of Ibotta, breaks down Cyber Five’s resurgence, why four retailers will top ecommerce growth, and how AI-driven traffic is leading conversion. Get the Report: https://t.co/NAS9HZQHDd #holidayspending #AIdrivencommerce https://t.co/96057gB7iI
- Aug 14, 2026
New! We've expanded our AI Visibility Index with industry leaderboards and analysis, alongside the latest reports from our analysts. Explore what's new and stay ahead of how AI is reshaping discovery. 👉 Learn more about the AIVI: https://t.co/vMYzLVJtQP #AIVI #AIVisibility https://t.co/KqXTU6Fzlp
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 0 interactions against 264K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 37 original posts, its engagement rate beats 0% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 976 times each, and 0% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.37% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 63% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 37 posts sampled, 97% carry an image or video and 100% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 34 interactions. Recurring topics include #emarketersummit, #futureofdigital, #ai.
- What is EMARKETER's engagement rate on X?
- EMARKETER (@eMarketer) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 37 original posts from the last 30 days against 263,888 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0%, EMARKETER sits below the 10th percentile of the 66,128 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @eMarketer have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 0% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @eMarketer post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.23 posts per day across the measured window.