Back to @e507's profile

507 engagement report

@e507 - 309K followers on X

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.094%
of 309K followers
Per impression
0.746%
39K views on a typical post
Reach
12.6%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
291
interactions (median)
Saved
0.077%
30 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.33/day
active 17% of days
Peak time
09:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 291 interactions against 309K followers, an engagement rate of 0.094%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.746% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.8K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

Measured over 32 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 5, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

507's engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.094%, 507 sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99120.0%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 65,980 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 57,142 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile120.0%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 09:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video94% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 94% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 280 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 2, 202627x their median

    🤣🤣🤣 https://t.co/wNc569aJrI

    6.9K7036462366K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20264.2x their median

    Tek seferde 7,79 TL zam geldi; İstanbul ve birkaç kuzeybatı ili dışında tüm Türkiye'de motorin fiyatı 90 TL'yi geçti. https://t.co/iwQI53WKjp

    1.0K1086923171K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20263.3x their median

    Bu adam Harry Markopolos, emekli finansal analist ve sahtekarlık avcısı. 2000'de Bernard Madoff'un ilan ettiği getirilerin matematiksel olarak imkansız olduğunu fark etti ve bunu ABD Sermaye Piyasası Kurulu'na (SEC) defalarca resmi olarak bildirdi. Yıllar boyunca, defalarca detaylı raporlar sundu, hatta "Dünyanın En Büyük Hedge Fonu Bir Sahtekarlık" başlıklı bir memorandum bile yazdı. Ama Ponzi'nin patlaması onun sayesinde olmadı. SEC, Markopolos'un uyarılarını ciddiye almadı, soruşturmaları yüzeysel kaldı ve yüksek yerlerde herkesi tanıyan Madoff'a dokunulmadı. Asıl çöküş, 2008 küresel finans krizinde likidite sıkışıklığı yüzünden geldi: kriz sırasında yatırımcılar panikleyip yaklaşık 7 milyar dolarlık geri çekim talebinde bulundu, Madoff bu parayı ödeyemedi. Çünkü kasada bu kadar varlık yoktu, eski yatırımcılara yeni yatırımcıların parasıyla ödeme yapılıyordu. Aralık 2008'de oğullarına itiraf etti, onlar da yetkilileri bilgilendirdi ve tarihin en uzun ve büyük Ponzi kurucusu olarak tutuklandı. 150 yıllık hapis cezasını çekerken 2021'de 82 yaşında öldü. Markopolos gerçeği çok önceden görmüştü ama sistem onu dinlemedi. Dolandırıcılığı bitiren şey bir dedektifin ısrarı değil, ekonomik krizin yarattığı nakit sıkışıklığıydı. Özetle, para kazanan (kazandığını zanneden) insanlara ne derseniz deyin. Hırsları ve egoları hatayı kabul etmez, suçlu ve aşağılanan siz olursunuz. Masabaşında dizayn edilen fiyatlar, getiriler o kadar tatlıdır ki... "bunca kişi yanılıyor olamaz!". Çark döndüğü yere kadar gidilir; bazen 20 ay, bazen 20 yıl. Kırılacağı an bilinemez ama panik bir kere başladı mı da önü alınamaz. Bonus: Madoff mekanizmasını kurduğu 1990'da Nasdaq borsasının da başkanıydı, sonrasında çoğu kurulda görev yaptı.

    8268430871K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20263.1x their median

    Akdeniz motorini uçmaya devam ediyor, rekor seviyelere çıktı. Biz daha yeni 3,60 TL ÖTV zammı yemişken kısa zamanda 7-8 TL ek zam gelme ihtimali yükseliyor. Tabela fiyatları 90'a doğru yaklaşacak :/ https://t.co/2KV6p9wmCh

    8175734593K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20262.3x their median

    Son 4 günde nakit çıkışı yaşayan fonlar, Fintables https://t.co/ylzwYqESWE https://t.co/HKsvX0ITtD

    59832335142K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20262.2x their median

    Yeni başlayankar için "Ticari Krediler" https://t.co/DjblNAQk27

    5964410063K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.2x their median

    Parayı kim yaratır? Devlet vergiyi neden toplar? Türkiye ekonomisindeki bozuklukları nasıl düzeltmeliyiz? Ülkede 40 kitap yayınlamış ekonomistlerin dedikleri neden tamamen yanlış tabana oturuyor? Çok iyi bir yazı. Geniş zamanda okuyun.@soberlooked https://t.co/ZxuE2xEPZd https://t.co/oDDUsAdQ8a

    5606212655K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20262.1x their median

    Para piyasası fonu (her tür) alan şirketlere %10 stopaj geldi. Şimdiye kadar stopaj ödemiyor, kazançları kurumlar vergisi beyanına ekliyorlardı. Artık stopaj peşin kesilecek, geçici vergiden mahsup edecekler. https://t.co/kfLTWgp1Uj

    5534416767K viewsView on X
  • Sep 2, 20261.8x their median

    Finansal piyasaları iyi temsil eden bir paralel, tarihsel olarak endüstriyel tavuk büyüklükleri: https://t.co/Wud6CO0SSL

    4911113053K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20251.7x their median

    2026-2028 OVP hedefleri açıklandı: https://t.co/tlu0w9AP4g

    4274820591K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 291 interactions against 309K followers, an engagement rate of 0.094%. Measured over 32 original posts, its engagement rate beats 60% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 39K times each, and 0.746% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 12.6% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.3 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 17% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 32 posts sampled, 94% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 7.8K interactions, about 27x its own typical post.

What is 507's engagement rate on X?
507 (@e507) has an engagement rate of 0.094%, based on the median interactions across 32 original posts from the last 30 days against 309,330 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.094%, 507 sits above the 25th percentile of the 65,980 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @e507 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 60% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @e507 post?
Most posts go out around 09:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.33 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going