Back to @dyradyre's profile

taitai go gaigai 🦷 engagement report

@dyradyre - 63K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.159%
of 63K followers
Per impression
0.761%
13K views on a typical post
Reach
20.9%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
100
interactions (median)
Saved
0.08%
10 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.27/day
active 47% of days
Peak time
07:00 UTC
Wednesday

A typical post picks up 100 interactions against 63K followers, an engagement rate of 0.159%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.761% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 364x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

taitai go gaigai 🦷's engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 5 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 30% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.159%, taitai go gaigai 🦷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,152 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 07:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Wednesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Wednesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link14% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 14% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 293 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 8, 2026364x their median

    when you finally surrender, and accept that it is what it is. https://t.co/AhyRtqhPQ7

    30K6.7K51183612K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202621x their median

    Some have to work so hard … some just sakau ! https://t.co/bYBwTt0pFt

    1.5K526311740K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202612x their median

    Had a slice of orange cake for RM12+ drink for RM16. Total with tax= RM29. Thing is, something isn't right when a basic mediocre slice of cake costs RM12. I'm not an economist, but is our rent too high? Ingredients too costly? Labour memang takla coz we all earn peanuts here.

    893233273437K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20268.9x their median

    TERKINI CLAN Malaysia menyokong pendedahan YB Rafizi Ramli mengenai Skandal FELDA bernilai RM 14.4 Bilion yang didedahkan dalam Podcast Yang Berhenti Menteri dan mendesak agar Kerajaan menyiasat dengan teliti dan telus skandal ini kerana ia melibatkan duit rakyat https://t.co/efe3EGf3wr

    5683153853K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20264.7x their median

    Seorang wanita Malaysia ditahan di Lapangan Terbang Antarabangsa Indira Gandhi (IGI), New Delhi selepas dikesan membawa lebih 15 kilogram (kg) ganja bernilai 52.5 juta rupee (RM2.24 juta), Jumaat lalu. Kastam Delhi dalam kenyataan memaklumkan, wanita berkenaan tiba di Terminal 3 lapangan terbang itu dari Kuala Lumpur sebelum dikenal pasti menerusi proses pemprofilan penumpang. https://t.co/T9dAkUP2d6

    2401433650517K viewsView on X
  • Dec 5, 20223.3x their median

    Bestnya until now dapat DM doa I bacakan masa umrah makbul. I’m happy for y’all. Kita usaha the rest we leave it to Him 🥰

    2735136View on X
  • Sep 22, 2026

    baru je tengok ada influencer post suami baik etc. tau tau harini cerai ain is real i guess idk. also spouses really have a way to humiliate their other half. tak kesah laki ke perempuan. kena ingat diorang ni manusia tak sempurna pegang tu je.

    9122126.4K viewsView on X
  • Sep 21, 2026

    Far worse than just having low, suboptimal levels of vitamin D is the fact that you have this dumpster fire inside of you that's causing inflammation and also sequestering your vitamin D. AKA visceral fat. You've got to target the real culprit before you see real improvement.

    93412423K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 2026

    Here’s a question from my latest Substack post. It's about obesity and obesity medicine and it should be rhetorical. Regrettably, it's not: Q. If you were going to study a disorder of excess fat accumulation (i.e., too much fat in fat cells) and the action of the drugs that so spectacularly treat it, wouldn’t you be at least vaguely interested in the physiological mechanisms that determine how much fat those fat cells will store? 1. Yes? 2. No? Common sense (and the history of obesity science) might suggest the answer has to be yes, but the expert authors of a recent Endocrine Society Scientific Statement on  “Obesity science, research gaps, and opportunities in the new era of obesity medicines,” would claim otherwise. They put the brain at the center of obesity science and GLP-1 action, then omit (ignore?) a century of science suggesting that since it's the fat cells that get fatter in obesity, the direct neuroendocrine regulation of fat storage in those cells must be relevant. These expert authors include @kevinhallPhD and @danielJdrucker and a half dozen others, and we can assume they know more about obesity than anyone. They’re the experts. But if so, why do they ignore the fat cell itself when discussing why we accumulate excess fat in fat cells, and why GLP-1 drugs do such a remarkable job of reversing that process? What are they missing with their conviction that obesity is an "appetitive behavior" disorder? The Black Hole at the Galactic Core of Obesity and GLP-1 Drug Science https://t.co/MvNUYsgiYE

    67106520K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026

    Orang pakai tudung ada banyak sebab; sebab mak ayah suruh, sbb fashion, sbb malas nak buat rambut, sbb sekolah, sbb jual makanan dll Tapi jadi lah kita org yg menutup aurat sbb Allah. Sebab tu ilmu dan amalan kena seiring. Tingkatkan ilmu supaya tahu dan selalu diingatkan ttg—

    13311758 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 100 interactions against 63K followers, an engagement rate of 0.159%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 54% of 20,445 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 13K times each, and 0.761% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 21.1% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.3 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 47% of days. Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video, 14% are part of a thread and 14% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 36K interactions, about 364x its own typical post.

What is taitai go gaigai 🦷's engagement rate on X?
taitai go gaigai 🦷 (@dyradyre) has an engagement rate of 0.159%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 62,736 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.159%, taitai go gaigai 🦷 sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,152 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dyradyre have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 54% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,445 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dyradyre post?
Most posts go out around 07:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.27 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going