Rick G. Rosner engagement report
@dumbassgenius - 762K followers on X
Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 762K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0.661% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.357% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 1389x its own typical post.
Measured over 57 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 29, 2026. Recurring tag: #ettd.
Compared with accounts its own size
Rick G. Rosner's engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 37% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.002%, Rick G. Rosner sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.141% |
| 75th percentile | 0.671% |
| 90th percentile | 2.53% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 42% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 25% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 42% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 25% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 193 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 9, 20261389x their median
Turns out Trump's mystery meat is coming from a Brazilian agri-oligarch who's friend of Melania, and it includes scraps & chunks of meat that have been frozen for years before being ground up & mixed with American beef. Bon appétit! https://t.co/tcsIuokNUS
- Sep 1, 20261378x their median
🚨 JUST IN: President Trump posts that he’s going full AFFORDABILITY mode ahead of the midterms “Cheaper drugs, cheaper beef, cheaper gas” 🔥 Great news for the midterms 👏🏻 https://t.co/vn90VTuQLH
- Sep 16, 2026624x their median
“I love the inflation.” -Donald Trump “I don’t think about Americans’ financial situation at all.” -Donald Trump “Affordability is a hoax.” -Donald Trump “Nobody gives a shit about housing. -Donald Trump “If gas prices rise, they rise.” -Donald Trump Vote them the fuck out this November!
- Aug 20, 2026323x their median
FOX BUSINESS: What are you doing to bring beef prices down? BROOKE ROLLINS: Listen, what we are facing in America today is the direct result of the previous administration https://t.co/74AiUV0xbj
- Aug 24, 2026229x their median
Let me tell you what didn't happen today. The Supreme Court did NOT rule that Trump's election order is legal. Six justices didn't sign their names to anything. They issued a short unsigned order saying the states sued too early. Now...here's what that little procedural shrug actually does. It UNFREEZES a directive telling the Post Office to deliver your mail ballot ONLY if your name appears on a federal list. A list Homeland Security builds. From databases you have NEVER SEEN...and cannot correct. Read that again. A clerk's typo in Washington...and your ballot never arrives. No hearing. No notice. It just…doesn't come.| States have to comply 60 days out. That's early September. The election is November 3. And...the fraud this is stopping? Researchers keep looking. They keep finding almost NONE. The President voted by mail in Florida this year. Nobody outlawed your vote today. Something QUIETER happened. The machinery that delivers your vote got moved OUT of your state's hands...and into a FEDERAL DATABASE...and you were told to sue later. Later...is November 4.
- Sep 4, 2026144x their median
Native-born labor force participation just hit its lowest August on record. Despite the admin's claims, deportations are not freeing up jobs for Americans — 600,000 native-born workers have left the labor force in the past year. https://t.co/uvbenUNJFT
- Jul 15, 2017127x their median
(THREAD) Growing Up w/ the World's 2nd-Highest IQ: A Memoir
- Sep 18, 2026102x their median
TRUMP-VOTING FARMER: “We’re fighting for survival… I’m very mad…” https://t.co/25G6ZPyQAU
- Aug 20, 202692x their median
Navy weighs renaming carrier slated to honor Black war hero, potentially switching it to Trump https://t.co/IcJASIkPGP
- Aug 23, 202688x their median
Washington Post begins its Sunday edition with a focus on Trump’s health https://t.co/47lzWBXi1I https://t.co/fd1US28ozi
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Recurring topics
The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 18 interactions against 762K followers, an engagement rate of 0.002%. Measured over 57 original posts, its engagement rate beats 18% of 19,932 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.7K times each, and 0.661% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.357% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 4.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on almost every day in the window. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 57 posts sampled, 42% carry an image or video, 9% are part of a thread and 25% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 25K interactions, about 1389x its own typical post.
- What is Rick G. Rosner's engagement rate on X?
- Rick G. Rosner (@dumbassgenius) has an engagement rate of 0.002%, based on the median interactions across 57 original posts from the last 30 days against 762,249 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.002%, Rick G. Rosner sits below the 10th percentile of the 201,005 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @dumbassgenius have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 18% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (19,932 accounts), which puts it in the bottom quarter for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @dumbassgenius post?
- Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 4.13 posts per day across the measured window.