Back to @dudagarbi's profile

Duda Garbi engagement report

@dudagarbi - 275K followers on X

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.023%
of 275K followers
Per impression
0.763%
8.4K views on a typical post
Reach
3.04%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
64
interactions (median)
Saved
0.03%
2 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.83/day
active 40% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 64 interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.4K times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 165x its own typical post.

Measured over 24 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 7, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Duda Garbi's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 39% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.023%, Duda Garbi sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.016% to 0.1%.

p100.002%
p250.016%
p50 (median)0.1%
p750.499%
p902.09%
p99119.5%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 66,393 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 56,924 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.002%
25th percentile0.016%
50th percentile0.1%
75th percentile0.499%
90th percentile2.09%
99th percentile119.5%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video83% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link42% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 83% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 42% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 205 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 7, 2026165x their median

    PODE FECHAR FIFA! Anulou um gol que teve 100 metros de contra-ataque! ESQUECE! FALA LOGO QUE TU QUER O MESSI CAMPEÃO!

    9.7K64218120131K viewsView on X
  • Dec 3, 202390x their median

    Agora sim a última despedida! 🥩🔥 Nem nos meus melhores sonhos poderia imaginar o ídolo @LuisSuarez9 na minha casa! Com muito orgulho que anúncio que nesta segunda-feira, 19h, tem “Um Assado para… L. Suárez”. A ÚNICA ENTREVISTA EXCLUSIVA do uruguaio por aqui! Peguem o lenço… 🥹 Esperamos vocês!

    5.4K26311130402K viewsView on X
  • Jul 24, 202665x their median

    André Lima: “Eu sou botafoguense.” Duda Garbi: “Então tu odeia o Flamengo? Porque todo mundo que é Botafogo, Fluminense ou Vasco odeia o Flamengo.” André Lima: “Eu joguei no Botafogo, no Vasco e no Fluminense. Eu não joguei no Flamengo porque eu não quis. O Vanderlei (Luxemburgo) queria me levar para o Flamengo, mas eu falei: ‘no Flamengo eu não jogo’.” 🎥 Canal @dudagarbi

    3.3K61767109531K viewsView on X
  • Jul 19, 202655x their median

    3 - Sur les 900 matches disputés à la Coupe du Monde sur la période d'analyse d'Opta (depuis 1966), seules trois équipes n'ont tenté aucun tir lors du temps réglementaire : 🇨🇷 Costa Rica en 1990 contre le Brésil 🇧🇷 🇨🇷 Costa Rica en 2022 contre l'Espagne 🇪🇸 🇦🇷 Argentine en 2026 contre l'Espagne 🇪🇸 Petit-Poucet.

    2.6K79930120306K viewsView on X
  • Aug 10, 202646x their median

    Alô, CBF! @MarceloM12 fala sobre o crescimento da carreira e a forma que a Espanha se aproximou do seu filho Enzo, jogador da base do Real Madrid! Te liga só! Nosso Assado é hoje, 19h, no Canal Duda Garbi! SENSACIONAL! 🔥🥩 https://t.co/3A022osaif

    2.8K27475113K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202629x their median

    Tô muito cansado de ver os mesmos jogos há 2 anos. Salvo dois ou três exceções, o Grêmio é igual sempre! E hoje, com requintes de crueldade, leva um gol aos 94 min depois de ter feito um 2º tempo minimamente razoável. O Grêmio cansa o torcedor e faz a gente quase perder as forças pra aguentar. Pelo amor de Deus!

    1.6K621431242K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 202620x their median

    Que time ruim, cara. Sério! Que horror ver nosso time jogar assim. A gente simplesmente não tem meio campo, não tem aproximação, não chuta, não arma, todos longe um do outro. Que dor. Assim não vamos conseguir nunca ganhar fora de casa. Temos medo de jogar?

    1.1K49144839K viewsView on X
  • Jul 15, 202617x their median

    10 anos de Kannemann no Grêmio. Quando ele chegou o jejum de titulos era enorme, o Grêmio se modificava de gestão em gestão e tentava criar uma identidade, que acabou se eternizando com uma geração de vencedores. As estrelas se alinharam no momento que ele chegou. Era a cereja do bolo. O torcedor dentro do campo. Ele nunca foi o mais talentoso, nem o mais amado da geração, mas era o mais gremista. Ele vestiu o clube, se identificou e se entregou por completo. Hoje, após 10 anos, com todas as ressalvas ele segue servindo ao clube por total dedicação e devoção. O gremista que não reconhece Kannemann um ídolo não merece Kannemann. Walter, tu é um de nós e nós te escolhemos para ser pra sempre o Grêmio em pessoa. Bendito 15 de julho de 2016, o dia em que o Grêmio conheceu sua versão personificada!

    1.0K4710312K viewsView on X
  • Jul 17, 202612x their median

    Tá 2 x 0 ao natural pro Mirassol! O Grêmio segue IDÊNTICO do que antes da parada. 21 pontos no 1º turno é um passaporte pra Série B. Pelo amor de Deus! É urgente!

    6751498524K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 202610x their median

    Eu tava no estádio e na hora eu vi a mão do atacante do Mirassol, mas parece que na tv não ficou claro. Segue a imagem bem clara! O erro mesmo foi o carrinho criminoso no Villasanti e consequente pênalti não marcado. Seguimos… 🇪🇪🙏🏼 https://t.co/aocV3TPe4G

    5502172930K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell X accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for X accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 64 interactions against 275K followers, an engagement rate of 0.023%. Measured over 24 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 6,874 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 8.4K times each, and 0.763% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.04% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.83 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 40% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 24 posts sampled, 83% carry an image or video and 42% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 11K interactions, about 165x its own typical post.

What is Duda Garbi's engagement rate on X?
Duda Garbi (@dudagarbi) has an engagement rate of 0.023%, based on the median interactions across 24 original posts from the last 30 days against 275,452 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.023%, Duda Garbi sits above the 25th percentile of the 66,393 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dudagarbi have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (6,874 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dudagarbi post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.83 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going