Back to @drstacigruber's profile

Dr. Staci Gruber engagement report

@drstacigruber - 374K followers on X

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 12, 2026.

Engagement

Per follower
0.008%
of 374K followers
Per impression
3.49%
831 views on a typical post
Reach
0.22%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
29
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.03/day
active 3% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

Early reading. We have captured 1 original post for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.

A typical post picks up 29 interactions against 374K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Posts are seen about 831 times each, and 3.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.222% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 175x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

Measured over 1 original post from a 30-day window, last computed on September 12, 2026.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.008%, Dr. Staci Gruber sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.024%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.679%
p902.56%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,582 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.679%
90th percentile2.56%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 115 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 9, 2026175x their median

    Today I turn 70! (How did that happen?) https://t.co/u9IKs6auue

    3.9K1899582499K viewsView on X
  • Apr 23, 202687x their median

    BREAKING: President Trump's acting attorney general reclassifies state-licensed medical marijuana as a less-dangerous drug in a major shift. https://t.co/qGpa1HuVc1

    1.8K5041051361.1M viewsView on X
  • Mar 30, 202636x their median

    Straight from the set of #Scarpetta Season 2. A massive thank you to all the fans that tuned in to Season 1! https://t.co/SeWpIevaZk

    897108331241K viewsView on X
  • Apr 19, 202612x their median

    Dr. Sanjay Gupta talks to Anderson about how medical cannabis is on the rise with women. "Weed 8: Women & Weed" premieres Sunday at 8p ET on CNN and the next day on the CNN app. https://t.co/R5huu4Rykm

    2605627845K viewsView on X
  • Feb 11, 20261.6x their median

    🎙️Had the pleasure of joining @smalonemd on her podcast #TheSecondOpinion to dive into how cannabis affects women’s mood, sleep & hormones - from real-life impacts to what the science is starting to show. 🌿✨ Watch the full conversation here 👉 https://t.co/CNujdCKB8z #Cannabis #WomensHealth #Sleep #Hormones #Podcast #drstacigruber

    396203.1K viewsView on X
  • Apr 7, 2026

    Today is Charlotte Figi Day, which recognizes the incredible contribution of a little girl who started a revolution and ultimately changed the world 🌍✨ Her use of high-CBD products to treat severe epilepsy sparked a national conversation on cannabinoids 🧠🌿 🎧 Check out the latest on @USATODAY's The Excerpt – link in bio 🔗 #CharlotteFigi #CBD #MedicalCannabis #TheExcerpt #USATODAY #TheMindProgram

    356022.0K viewsView on X
  • Aug 25, 2026

    The world has lost a truly original and defining voice… and a lovely soul’ 🕊️🖤 R.I.P. Dolly https://t.co/9HMWGWAoMO

    24410890 viewsView on X
  • Jul 1, 2026

    Wishing the happiest of birthdays to a true legend— the extraordinary @dan_aykroyd https://t.co/UXJbji8Vgq

    230101.1K viewsView on X
  • Apr 20, 2026

    Okay Such a great conversation with @drsanjaygupta for @CNN at @McLeanHospital @harvardmed about why growing numbers of women are turning to cannabis to treat medical and mental health conditions, and its impact and influence on women’s health 🌿 https://t.co/EulNVk2nYa

    175101.0K viewsView on X
  • Jul 5, 2026

    Nothing like a wedding for a great photo op with @MichaelOrland 📸✨ #StephPat2026 https://t.co/ksrBjLSAh7

    13211953 viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 29 interactions against 374K followers, an engagement rate of 0.008%. Posts are seen about 831 times each, and 3.49% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.222% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.03 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 3% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 1 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.1K interactions, about 175x its own typical post. Only 1 original post have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.

What is Dr. Staci Gruber's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Staci Gruber (@drstacigruber) has an engagement rate of 0.008%, based on the median interactions across 1 original posts from the last 30 days against 373,612 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.008%, Dr. Staci Gruber sits above the 10th percentile of the 205,582 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @drstacigruber have real engagement?
There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
When does @drstacigruber post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going