Back to @drsimonegold's profile

Dr. Simone Gold engagement report

@drsimonegold - 931K followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.025%
of 931K followers
Per impression
1.42%
16K views on a typical post
Reach
1.74%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
230
interactions (median)
Saved
0.031%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.03/day
active 53% of days
Peak time
16:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 230 interactions against 931K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82K interactions, about 355x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 19, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Dr. Simone Gold's engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 57% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.025%, Dr. Simone Gold sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 16:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video15% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-+15%+14% to +16%32K
  • 15% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 315 characters, which falls in the over 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts over 280 characters run 15% above the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 11, 2026355x their median

    "Today, at my direction, Dr. Mehmet Oz announced that Medicaid will NO LONGER fund gender transition surgeries and hormones for minors... Just think about all of the young, innocent, and perhaps confused children who will be spared!" - President DONALD J. TRUMP 🇺🇸 https://t.co/45VMT7GG6b

    65K13K2.6K825891K viewsView on X
  • Aug 19, 202670x their median

    David Morens just pleaded guilty. Fauci’s senior advisor. The man who sat at his right hand for years. He used a secret Gmail account to hide official communications from the American people. He destroyed and concealed federal records to evade FOIA. He worked to protect the grants that flowed into Wuhan and the narrative that COVID could not have come from the lab his agency funded. This was not a clerical error. This was a deliberate cover-up while the country was locked down, censored, injected, and told to “trust the science.” Careers were destroyed. Early treatments were suppressed. Children lost years of their childhoods. Millions suffered. We stood on the steps of the Supreme Court in 2020 and told the truth. They censored us. They called us dangerous. They were the ones deleting the evidence. One guilty plea is not enough. The house of cards is still standing as long as the man at the top remains untouched. Accountability is not optional. It is the only path back to medicine and a free country.

    11K4.2K3271951.0M viewsView on X
  • Oct 7, 2020112x their median

    According to the CDC’s data, the survival rate for COVID-19 is as follows:  0-19: 99.997% 20-49: 99.98% 50-69: 99.5% 70 & over: 94.6%   Life expectancy in the USA per CDC: 78.7 (2018)

    8.8K4.1K251388View on X
  • Sep 10, 202618x their median

    When I met Charlie, I didn’t just meet a conservative leader. I met a kindred spirit. Neither of us cared much for labels. What mattered was liberty. We bonded over medical freedom. https://t.co/NXnwdDTDYm

    3.8K32556330K viewsView on X
  • Sep 15, 202611x their median

    Fauci is no longer in office, but that doesn’t mean the danger is gone. Other bureaucrats are just as willing to sacrifice Americans for power and self-promotion. What we need now is accountability. Arrest Fauci.

    2.1K32336527K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 202610x their median

    Justice for Fauci isn’t about revenge. It’s about the next pandemic, the next mandate, the next time bureaucrats try to cover up the truth and tyrannize the American people. If nothing happens now, we’ve told every future Fauci exactly how far they can go. @AFLDSorg isn’t backing down. We didn’t stay quiet when tyranny came for us, and we won’t stay quiet now.

    1.9K42064929K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 20268.1x their median

    Gov. Josh Shapiro announced two “measles deaths” in Lancaster County on Aug. 25 — billed as Pennsylvania’s first in 35 years, both unvaccinated, and immediately used to attack RFK Jr. and falling vaccination rates. Hours later the story cracked. Lancaster County Coroner Stephen Diamantoni said his office had handled no measles deaths. The only case he was reviewing: an infant who died of a ruptured spleen. Measles virus was found in lung tissue after death and later listed only as a contributing condition, not the cause. The second death was unknown to the coroner’s office. State officials then changed the language to “measles-associated.” That phrase is not a medical diagnosis. It’s the same labeling trick used in COVID, when a positive test was enough to call a death a “COVID death,” and the same kind of invented wording used on a Nevada death certificate: “Sudden Death In The Setting Of Therapeutic Use Of Hydroxychloroquine.” Until last week, even the AAP said this U.S. outbreak had produced zero measles deaths — after nearly 3,000 cases. The 2019 outbreak also produced zero U.S. deaths. New York still used it to wipe out religious exemptions. Now the same pattern is back: • Pennsylvania bills to force annual counseling before a religious or philosophical exemption • Minnesota bills to strip the “conscientiously held beliefs” exemption for MMR • A South Carolina bill to ban unvaccinated kids from K–12 and day care without a medical exemption On Bill Maher’s show, Molly Jong-Fast claimed two people died of measles in Ohio. Ohio’s health department has said there have been zero measles deaths in the state. Maher’s reply was simpler: he had measles as a kid, stayed home two weeks, and ate ice cream. Measles is real. Inflating deaths to erase exemptions is something else.

    1.3K445592731K viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 20267.8x their median

    Fauci is the man behind America’s empty cribs. We have the texts. Sen. Ron Johnson’s office is reviewing 34,000 text messages from Anthony Fauci’s phone. The first batch is out. January 2021: Surgeon General Vivek Murthy asks Fauci and Rochelle Walensky a simple question—any data on COVID vaccine safety at different stages of pregnancy? Walensky: “This is all…data free.” CDC has a V-safe pregnancy registry. That’s it. Fauci first dismisses concerns about “genetic” vaccines and early pregnancy. Two hours later he returns with a warning he confirmed with other scientists: “Since many people have significant cytokine storm and fever after the 2nd dose, this theoretically could be associated with miscarriage in the 1st trimester.” Walensky: “Definitely a good point.” Murthy then asks how to respond to the WHO advising against the Moderna shot in pregnancy due to lack of data. Fauci’s reply: Weigh risks vs benefits. COVID can be serious in pregnancy. More than 10,000 pregnant women have been vaccinated post-EUA. “No issues have arisen.” Recap: • No clinical trial data • Known theoretical miscarriage risk from fever/cytokine response • WHO cautioning against it • Women of childbearing age at near-zero risk from COVID itself Yet they pushed the shots. Weeks later Fauci told the media ~20,000 pregnant women vaccinated with “no red flags.” By April the Task Force formally recommended it. By August he said it was “pretty clear” they should take it, citing observational tracking—not trials. Pfizer’s own early adverse-event data showed high rates of miscarriage, stillbirth, and neonatal death among reported pregnancy cases. Their promised pregnancy trial enrolled a fraction of the planned number. Meanwhile Fauci himself suffered a pulmonary infarction (from embolism) months after his televised shot—and stayed silent. Medicine has always treated pregnant women with extreme caution. Here that caution was discarded on the word of officials who privately acknowledged the data gap and the theoretical risks. The texts are public. Read them.

    1.2K4011822793K viewsView on X
  • Sep 16, 20266.5x their median

    Once governments can quietly purge the doctors who disagree with them, every medical controversy — on any topic — gets decided by who has the power to fire the dissenters, not by science or ethics.

    1.2K28115730K viewsView on X
  • Sep 4, 20266.0x their median

    When doctors view patients as God’s creation, they treat them with respect, compassion, and kindness. They honor the right to autonomy and informed consent because those rights are divinely given.

    1.2K17230429K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 230 interactions against 931K followers, an engagement rate of 0.025%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 47% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 16K times each, and 1.42% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 1.74% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 53% of days. Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 15% carry an image or video and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 82K interactions, about 355x its own typical post.

What is Dr. Simone Gold's engagement rate on X?
Dr. Simone Gold (@drsimonegold) has an engagement rate of 0.025%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 930,694 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.025%, Dr. Simone Gold sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @drsimonegold have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 47% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @drsimonegold post?
Most posts go out around 16:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.03 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going