豆包 engagement report
@doubao23333 - 125K followers on X
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Engagement
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 125K followers, an engagement rate of 1.57%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 6.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.
Measured over 16 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Compared with accounts its own size
豆包's engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 8 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.
On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 90% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 1.57%, 豆包 sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.678% to 2.55%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | -8% | -9% to -7% | 41K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 35 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Sep 22, 20263.3x their median
喜欢看腿的有福了(没弄光环致歉 https://t.co/XBR2wyqron
- Sep 17, 20263.0x their median
大伙更喜欢看这样的吗 https://t.co/IMeh34OkAD
- Sep 23, 20262.4x their median
火花花不是区 https://t.co/hFLrP2Zh1M
- Oct 3, 20262.3x their median
晚安Zzzzzz https://t.co/NoLD42UnJj
- Sep 9, 20262.1x their median
怎么还有问我是不是好女孩的,首先我就不是女孩😠 https://t.co/sKufI5vINe
- Oct 2, 20261.6x their median
请宝宝们支持火花花,助力火花花击败爻老板 https://t.co/J6f4p9AF05
- Sep 26, 20261.5x their median
想看这样的?唉,好吧好吧,谁让我宠你呢,小灰毛~ https://t.co/D5SE2kzmAa
- Sep 24, 2026
允许我水一下 https://t.co/1qrx5BkgZU
- Sep 18, 2026
你在看些什么呢~ https://t.co/cezVDgqCBr
- Sep 10, 2026
狼狈の老板娘 https://t.co/dyeijEeyyI
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 125K followers, an engagement rate of 1.57%. Measured over 16 original posts, its engagement rate beats 94% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 32K times each, and 6.05% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 25.2% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 60% of days. Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 16 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 6.4K interactions, about 3.3x its own typical post.
- What is 豆包's engagement rate on X?
- 豆包 (@doubao23333) has an engagement rate of 1.57%, based on the median interactions across 16 original posts from the last 30 days against 125,405 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 1.57%, 豆包 sits above the 75th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @doubao23333 have real engagement?
- Its engagement rate beats 94% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
- When does @doubao23333 post?
- Most posts go out around 15:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.