Back to @dotkrueger's profile

Fred Krueger engagement report

@dotkrueger - 391K followers on X

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 391K followers
Per impression
1.19%
14K views on a typical post
Reach
3.53%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
164
interactions (median)
Saved
0.036%
5 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
3.67/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
02:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 164 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #economy, #markets.

Measured over 72 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 1, 2026. Recurring tags: #bitcoin, #economy, #markets.

Compared with accounts its own size

Fred Krueger's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 52% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Fred Krueger sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.025% to 0.146%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.697%
p902.61%
p9982.8%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 212,741 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,375 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.697%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile82.8%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 02:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video35% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link31% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 35% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 31% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 123 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 30, 202615x their median

    BREAKING: Bitcoin may already be quantum-safe According to peer reviewed new research by Oxford Physicist Tim Palmer, there likely exists a fundamental ceiling of roughly 400 coherently entangled qubits. The latest estimates require at least 835 logical qubits to break Bitcoin’s signatures with Shor’s algorithm. References in comments. Elon Musk and Steve Jurvetson have commented positively on this research.

    2.1K22910437166K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202611x their median

    If bitcoin repeats the 2019-21 fractal the next top is $669k in July 2027. $BTC https://t.co/uIOajtGpLk

    1.5K1391722594K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20268.5x their median

    You aren’t going to beat Bitcoin over the next 10 years. Useless trying.

    1.2K591161554K viewsView on X
  • Sep 8, 20268.1x their median

    BREAKING: The U.S. is reportedly targeting Iranian oil tankers in the Strait of Hormuz, according to a U.S. official cited by i24NEWS. Explosions have been reported near Kharg Island amid reports of U.S. strikes along Iran’s coast. Iran says retaliation is coming within hours, with its forces reportedly preparing to target U.S. aircraft carriers and other American military assets.

    1.1K190251686K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20267.9x their median

    BTCNOW LAUNCHES “PAY-OVER-TIME” BITCOIN PURCHASES WITH 60 MONTHLY PAYMENTS @BTCNowHQ has launched a new model allowing customers to lock in a Bitcoin purchase at today’s price while paying for it over five years. Unlike dollar-cost averaging, the Bitcoin price is fixed when the purchase is made rather than changing with each monthly payment. The company says: • Payments are spread across 60 fixed monthly installments • Bitcoin is held in trust until fully paid • BitGo provides custody • There are no margin calls or forced liquidations from BTC price declines • A U.S.-wide rollout is planned over the coming months The model effectively brings “buy now, pay later” financing to Bitcoin, allowing customers to secure BTC upfront without paying the full purchase amount on day one.

    99111713559157K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20267.2x their median

    Bitcoin will be widely used as a means of exchange. AFTER it hits 5 Million per coin. You can wait for this before you invest, but you will basically miss the entire move.

    1.0K56109647K viewsView on X
  • Sep 27, 20267.0x their median

    A simplified Bitcoin flow model: It takes roughly 300,000 BTC of net buying to double the price. Symmetrically, roughly 300,000 BTC of net selling cuts the price in half. That’s the model. Bull market: Bitcoin went from roughly $30K when the ETF was announced to about $120K — a 4x. Estimated institutional buying: ~1.2M BTC Exceptional OG selling: ~600K BTC Net buying: ~600K BTC 600K net buying = two doublings. $30K → $60K → $120K. Bear market: Bitcoin went from roughly $120K to $60K. Exceptional OG selling: ~600K BTC Saylor/Strategy buying: ~300K BTC Net selling: ~300K BTC One halving. $120K → $60K. Simple model. Surprisingly good fit.

    1.0K5773878K viewsView on X
  • Aug 30, 20266.3x their median

    WHY BITCOIN PRICE MODELS KEEP FOOLING SMART PEOPLE A public service announcement as we head into the Bitcoin bull market

    77910911239196K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20265.7x their median

    We're getting an interest rate hike next week, $110 oil and 5% 10yr notes. Have a nice day. https://t.co/FIYkZ4Zegy

    8053287627K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20265.5x their median

    In a world where the US just destroyed 5 Iranian Tankers, declared "we are the house" to the Bond Market, and effectively has stopped trade with Canada... Bitcoin is the RISK OFF asset.

    8165135224K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bitcoin#economy#markets

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 164 interactions against 391K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 72 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 14K times each, and 1.19% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 3.51% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 3.7 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 72 posts sampled, 35% carry an image or video, 13% are part of a thread and 31% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 2.5K interactions, about 15x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bitcoin, #economy, #markets.

What is Fred Krueger's engagement rate on X?
Fred Krueger (@dotkrueger) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 72 original posts from the last 30 days against 390,580 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Fred Krueger sits above the 25th percentile of the 212,741 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dotkrueger have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dotkrueger post?
Most posts go out around 02:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 3.67 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going