Back to @dose's profile

dose. engagement report

@dose - 622K followers on X

Measured over 74 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026.

Engagement

Bottom 10% for its size
Per follower
0%
of 622K followers
Per impression
0.041%
2.4K views on a typical post
Reach
0.39%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1
interactions (median)
Saved
0%
0 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.47/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
23:00 UTC
Sunday

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 622K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 74 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.388% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 74 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 80 interactions, about 80x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dose, #health, #neuroscience.

Measured over 74 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 7, 2026. Recurring tags: #dose, #health, #neuroscience.

Compared with accounts its own size

dose.'s engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 3% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At under 0.001%, dose. sits below the 10th percentile of the 211,892 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the bottom 25% band, which runs below 0.025%.

p100.004%
p250.025%
p50 (median)0.146%
p750.693%
p902.61%
p9983.1%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 211,892 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,457 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.025%
50th percentile0.146%
75th percentile0.693%
90th percentile2.61%
99th percentile83.1%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 23:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Sunday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Sunday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length-no effect-2% to -1%42K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 220 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 21, 202680x their median

    🧪 Your stomach acid can dissolve metal. A razor blade turns brittle in just 24 hours. Yet it never digests itself. Sources: Healthline, ACS #dose #biology #science #health https://t.co/TFFJkU7ABB

    800004.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 22, 202631x their median

    Is dietary protein restriction a key to longevity? Recent research suggests it might be. A study published by Neuroscience News reveals that reducing dietary protein can enhance metabolism, increase FGF21 levels, and extend lifespan, challenging the prevailing trend of high-prote https://t.co/qZeJOwahq0

    271302.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202622x their median

    They are the friend who arrives at brunch with the latest adaptogen-infused latte in hand, a small smile of satisfied curiosity playing on their lips. Conversations often revolve around the freshest trends in wellness, whether it's the benefits of reishi mushrooms or the merits o https://t.co/lKtv8R5j1t

    220002.3K viewsView on X
  • Aug 29, 202618x their median

    Life’s too short not to find humor in the chaos we call living. Keep it light, friends. https://t.co/g1RjpIYNLn

    135004.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 23, 202615x their median

    There’s a quiet magic in the little moments of our days, if we take the time to notice them. Life often feels like a whirlwind, yet it’s in those pauses—the leaf crunch beneath our feet or the soft nuzzle of a beloved pet—where true richness lies. We move through our routines, o https://t.co/w8FKeAq89v

    150002.6K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 202615x their median

    🧠 Smart people feel worse with more socializing High IQ, lots of friends: happiness drops. Solitude fuels smart minds. Sources: WaPo, Psych Today #dose #IQ #Psychology #Solitude https://t.co/XUTlSWVbvO

    140013.1K viewsView on X
  • Sep 30, 20268.0x their median

    🩸 Donating blood cuts heart attack risk 88% Study of 3,000 found yearly donors had big drop. Give blood, help your heart. Sources: Am. J. Epidemiology #dose #hearthealth #blooddonation https://t.co/EEInFZA1zk

    62003.9K viewsView on X
  • Aug 21, 20268.0x their median

    🐶 Talking to your dog isn't silly. Psychologists call it anthropomorphism. A sign of a healthy brain. Sources: UChicago, New Yorker #dose #psychology #pets https://t.co/WuCDlMTGz9

    80002.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20267.0x their median

    🧠 Burnout isn't from stress. It's overthinking. Rumination floods your brain with waste chemicals. Let go, don't loop. Sources: Current Biology, Nature Comms #dose #neuroscience #burnout https://t.co/oWP5Xu7NIx

    51103.0K viewsView on X
  • Oct 3, 20266.0x their median

    🧘 Legs up the wall resets body and mind. 5 min, no gear, just gravity in reverse. A tiny habit, big payoff. Sources: Cleveland Clinic, Healthline #dose #yoga #wellness #recovery https://t.co/UuAvoiQ99P

    51005.8K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#dose#health#neuroscience#wellness#mentalhealth

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1 interaction against 622K followers, an engagement rate of 0%. Measured over 74 original posts, its engagement rate beats 3% of 21,185 tracked accounts of a similar size. That is a reason to look at how the audience behaves - reply depth, saves, whether the followers are recent - rather than a conclusion about it on its own. Posts are seen about 2.4K times each, and 0.041% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 0.388% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.5 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 74 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 80 interactions, about 80x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #dose, #health, #neuroscience.

What is dose.'s engagement rate on X?
dose. (@dose) has an engagement rate of 0%, based on the median interactions across 74 original posts from the last 30 days against 622,375 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At under 0.001%, dose. sits below the 10th percentile of the 211,892 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dose have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 3% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (21,185 accounts), which puts it in the bottom 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dose post?
Most posts go out around 23:00 UTC, and Sunday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.47 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going