Back to @donamarahp's profile

Mister engagement report

@donamarahp - 421K followers on X

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.042%
of 421K followers
Per impression
1.06%
17K views on a typical post
Reach
3.97%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
179
interactions (median)
Saved
0.027%
4 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
0.63/day
active 30% of days
Peak time
06:00 UTC
Friday

A typical post picks up 179 interactions against 421K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

Measured over 14 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 25, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Mister's engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 49% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.042%, Mister sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,694 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,880 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 06:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Friday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Friday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video36% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link29% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 36% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 29% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 112 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jun 4, 202630x their median

    I just dumped my entire $HYPE and $NEAR position, I will explain why in my essay "Reality Test" dropping next Tuesday. TLDR: - Higher energy prices due to Iran war and inventory restocking - 3 Mega AI IPOs between now and early Q3 - Prediction that Trump goes anti-AI to win mid-terms for Republicans - I think highs in mrkts will happen btw now and September - Time to take profit, and two-step in beefa without worrying about my positions

    3.3K2741.3K5572.2M viewsView on X
  • Jan 27, 2026

    🗻 https://t.co/zACQJrk7KY

    1.4K1652963761K viewsView on X
  • Mar 10, 20268.6x their median

    Ми збираємо 4–5 АКБ на день, а замовлень нема. Не розумію, чому так. Дуже розчарований. Підтримайте ветеранський бізнес: https://t.co/Emtj69gEzl Дзвоніть +380 93 423 4219 або пишіть @Tolocenko21411O https://t.co/B2qiiLdDNQ

    94654147249K viewsView on X
  • Feb 1, 2026

    AI szn on TRON

    7284338141158K viewsView on X
  • Sep 18, 20265.6x their median

    Six months ago, we were figuring out how to do an airdrop for HOT users. That’s when we came up with the NEAR@X concept. I told the HOT community very clearly what they needed to do. And now, active users will receive some very generous rewards. The most active users will get over 10 000 USD, while users with substantial balances who made more than 10 swaps will get around 1000 USD. I kept posting about this. No need to thank me.

    6338722253123K viewsView on X
  • Mar 26, 20263.9x their median

    We're doing everything to reward real users and HOT holders. But if you're not a strong NEAR holder doing something useful in the ecosystem - your odds are close to zero

    326402983845K viewsView on X
  • Sep 24, 20263.5x their median

    I think a $100 billion mcap is absolutely realistic for NEAR 20-25x from current price this is why 142.37

    5123773538K viewsView on X
  • Feb 24, 2026

    https://t.co/aESBLZuVAb is here! For the first time, you can transact confidentially with any asset, across all chains, with one account – powered by @near_intents.

    494514215117K viewsView on X
  • Jan 11, 20262.9x their median

    Buy $NEAR

    4291674799K viewsView on X
  • Apr 2, 20262.2x their median

    100 NEAR

    212131501437K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 179 interactions against 421K followers, an engagement rate of 0.042%. Measured over 14 original posts, its engagement rate beats 56% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 17K times each, and 1.06% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.01% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.63 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 30% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 14 posts sampled, 36% carry an image or video and 29% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 5.4K interactions, about 30x its own typical post.

What is Mister's engagement rate on X?
Mister (@donamarahp) has an engagement rate of 0.042%, based on the median interactions across 14 original posts from the last 30 days against 421,116 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.042%, Mister sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,694 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @donamarahp have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 56% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @donamarahp post?
Most posts go out around 06:00 UTC, and Friday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.63 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going