Back to @discord's profile

Discord engagement report

@discord - 4.7M followers on X

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.03%
of 4.7M followers
Per impression
0.592%
244K views on a typical post
Reach
5.15%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.4K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.079%
192 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.17/day
active 57% of days
Peak time
21:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 4.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 244K times each, and 0.592% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 184K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.

Measured over 13 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 26, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

Discord's engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 10 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 35% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.03%, Discord sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,491 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 21:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video92% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link15% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 92% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 15% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 174 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Jul 21, 202679x their median

    Average discord call with a friend https://t.co/vcBCGeQRvg

    162K21K1955064.7M viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 2026111x their median

    she isn't ghosting you, dm's are down

    145K10K2.8K3.0K14M viewsView on X
  • Jun 30, 202612x their median

    Google is shutting down GIF provider Tenor’s public API at some point today, June 30th. Apps that rely on the public API to source GIFs will lose direct access to Tenor’s library. https://t.co/IZCMkCqi5r

    74K5.2K2.3K11K20M viewsView on X
  • Aug 13, 202641x their median

    Starting today, the free upload limit is increasing from 10MB to 20MB. We're also changing how that limit is checked on mobile, with file size now measured before compression instead of after, matching how desktop already works. (1/3) https://t.co/JrL0igcoJL

    52K4.5K1.3K1.6K8.6M viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 202625x their median

    The foldable iPhone will release on October 23. Pricing starts at $1999. https://t.co/6igbJv2XHE

    33K1.3K6911.4K2.9M viewsView on X
  • Oct 6, 202621x their median

    this stupid fat company wont add anything for free https://t.co/mYhtZ5iPBT

    28K2.7K1891031.0M viewsView on X
  • Sep 28, 202620x their median

    Discord is testing a new "Game Mode" to help your PC run smoother while using the app It reduces animations to free up CPU and GPU resources https://t.co/8LGiPfP2Mj

    28K8142802751.8M viewsView on X
  • Aug 14, 202619x their median

    Gonna tweet like a news account rq hang on DISCORD has added experimental new badges that some people may be seeing live now. The app has also stated that an experiment for badge hiding is coming soon as well. https://t.co/a4377DkVdg

    26K8935331981.6M viewsView on X
  • Jul 10, 20263.1x their median

    https://t.co/fX2tnan3dc

    19K1.5K2128651K viewsView on X
  • Jul 7, 20265.6x their median

    This weekend, our safety systems incorrectly triggered and banned around 200 accounts. Everyone affected has been reinstated. Here's what happened. A thread 🧵

    13K2.3K1.1K4294.0M viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.4K interactions against 4.7M followers, an engagement rate of 0.03%. Measured over 13 original posts, its engagement rate beats 51% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 244K times each, and 0.592% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 5.15% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 57% of days. Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 13 posts sampled, 92% carry an image or video, 15% are part of a thread and 15% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 184K interactions, about 79x its own typical post.

What is Discord's engagement rate on X?
Discord (@discord) has an engagement rate of 0.03%, based on the median interactions across 13 original posts from the last 30 days against 4,744,604 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.03%, Discord sits above the 25th percentile of the 204,491 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @discord have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 51% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @discord post?
Most posts go out around 21:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.17 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going