Back to @diesgu's profile

diesgu engagement report

@diesgu - 66K followers on X

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.045%
of 66K followers
Per impression
2.08%
1.4K views on a typical post
Reach
2.18%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
30
interactions (median)
Saved
0.069%
1 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2.07/day
active 67% of days
Peak time
01:00 UTC
Tuesday

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 66K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 2.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 1241x its own typical post.

Measured over 55 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 21, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

diesgu's engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 6 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.045%, diesgu sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the below the median band, which runs 0.024% to 0.143%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,475 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,893 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 01:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Tuesday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Tuesday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video64% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link0% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--8%-9% to -7%41K
  • 64% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 78 characters, which falls in the under 80 characters band. Across the catalog, posts under 80 characters run 8% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 16, 20261241x their median

    Se tirar instagram e strava, metade dessa galera para de correr !!!

    32K4.4K163435580K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20261170x their median

    Como eu vou provar que tenho 29 anos, se esse é o suporte do meu celular? 😅💛 https://t.co/Q0WHbWDPkA

    32K2.6K2014271.1M viewsView on X
  • Sep 13, 2026571x their median

    lady gaga vestindo o seu bebe https://t.co/kxnm4VLxbn

    16K1.3K7774K viewsView on X
  • Sep 3, 2026477x their median

    Esse video é o twitter https://t.co/t0rjILc8xP

    12K2.2K353485K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 2026190x their median

    Eu teria vergonha de postar uma foto e aparecer "conteúdo gerado com IA" https://t.co/boPwPU2MoQ

    5.1K572251544K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 2026181x their median

    Quando eu digo que sou do sertão da paraíba https://t.co/LcWq5QcpoF

    5.0K19410399121K viewsView on X
  • Dec 31, 201874x their median

    eu uso muito o twitter como um jeito de conversar comigo mesmo, ao invés de ficar falando sozinho, eu gosto de digitar meus pensamentos e refletir, me desculpem, às vezes parece um monte de mensagens sem nexo isoladas, mas é uma argumentação comigo mesmo e é isso.

    1.4K6783067View on X
  • Sep 3, 202643x their median

    Dormi a noite toda e ainda acordei cansado https://t.co/a01hOrnFmj

    1.0K21471415K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 202626x their median

    as crianças tirando o juízo do saci perere https://t.co/vAI4qU2O1V

    67273101113K viewsView on X
  • Sep 17, 202611x their median

    a filha da gaga quando descobrir que é filha da gaga https://t.co/YzSE8VRYwf

    29347102.4K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 30 interactions against 66K followers, an engagement rate of 0.045%. Measured over 55 original posts, its engagement rate beats 36% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 1.4K times each, and 2.08% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 2.18% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2.1 posts a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 67% of days. Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 55 posts sampled, 64% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 37K interactions, about 1241x its own typical post.

What is diesgu's engagement rate on X?
diesgu (@diesgu) has an engagement rate of 0.045%, based on the median interactions across 55 original posts from the last 30 days against 66,153 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.045%, diesgu sits above the 25th percentile of the 205,475 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @diesgu have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 36% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @diesgu post?
Most posts go out around 01:00 UTC, and Tuesday is its busiest day, at roughly 2.07 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going