Dr. Deepti Gurdasani engagement report
@dgurdasani1 - 122K followers on X
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Engagement
Early reading. We have captured 3 original posts for this account, below the 8 we require before treating a median as settled. The numbers above describe what we have seen so far, not a finished profile of the account.
A typical post picks up 279 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.229%. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.828% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 32x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
Measured over 3 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 5, 2026.
Where this sits in the catalog
At 0.229%, Dr. Deepti Gurdasani sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.
Show the percentile table
| Percentile | Engagement rate |
|---|---|
| 10th percentile | 0.004% |
| 25th percentile | 0.024% |
| 50th percentile | 0.143% |
| 75th percentile | 0.678% |
| 90th percentile | 2.55% |
| 99th percentile | 82.4% |
This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built
Posting timing
This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
| Hour (UTC) | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| 00:00 UTC | -1% | 89K |
| 01:00 UTC | -2% | 90K |
| 02:00 UTC | -3% | 88K |
| 03:00 UTC | -4% | 94K |
| 04:00 UTC | -5% | 76K |
| 05:00 UTC | -4% | 75K |
| 06:00 UTC | -5% | 86K |
| 07:00 UTC | -5% | 93K |
| 08:00 UTC | -4% | 108K |
| 09:00 UTC | -4% | 124K |
| 10:00 UTC | -3% | 129K |
| 11:00 UTC | -3% | 141K |
| 12:00 UTC | -3% | 154K |
| 13:00 UTC | -3% | 167K |
| 14:00 UTC | -4% | 173K |
| 15:00 UTC | -2% | 176K |
| 16:00 UTC | -3% | 171K |
| 17:00 UTC | -3% | 159K |
| 18:00 UTC | -2% | 149K |
| 19:00 UTC | -2% | 141K |
| 20:00 UTC | -1% | 131K |
| 21:00 UTC | 0% | 116K |
| 22:00 UTC | -2% | 100K |
| 23:00 UTC | -1% | 90K |
Show engagement by day of week as a table
| Day | Vs author median | Posts |
|---|---|---|
| Sunday | +5% | 393K |
| Monday | +1% | 483K |
| Tuesday | -2% | 520K |
| Wednesday | -3% | 472K |
| Thursday | -2% | 430K |
| Friday | -3% | 447K |
| Saturday | +2% | 393K |
Formats this account uses
Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.
| Format | This account | Catalog effect | 95% interval | Accounts behind it |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Image or video | 100% of posts | +111% | +108% to +115% | 34K |
| Outbound link | 0% of posts | -41% | -42% to -40% | 32K |
| Typical length | - | no effect | -2% to -1% | 42K |
- 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
- 0% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
- Its average post runs 272 characters, which falls in the 180 - 280 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 180 to 280 characters match the same accounts' other posts almost exactly.
These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.
Best tweets
- Oct 14, 202032x their median
NEW Correspondence—80+ researchers warn that a so-called #herdimmunity approach to managing #COVID19 is “a dangerous fallacy unsupported by the scientific evidence” #WCPH2020 https://t.co/2gTtklAkwx https://t.co/q4YNZFJM22
- Aug 22, 202617x their median
The Ghent professor who hired Cofnas through the back door has been part of what looks like a resurgence of 'race science' in various pockets across Europe. Belgian journalists have been onto this for a while. https://t.co/hpHqtRukkF
- Aug 21, 202613x their median
Gotta love the white academics talking about academic freedom/standards/integrity now that Cofnas was suspended. A eugenicist (backed by powerful networks) led a campaign against a Black scholar calling him "retarded", "illiterate", hounding him to death. So let's talk standards
- Aug 30, 20269.4x their median
A new Substack article by @Cartrarian provides very convincing evidence that Jason Arday never had autism. The article shows that: ➡️Arday never mentioned he had autism until 2018. Even in his 2015 dissertation, he merely says he had "learning difficulties." ➡️The diagnostic history Arday reported was contradictory and anachronistic. Some of the labels he claims he had as a child were rare or nonexistent at the time. Other diagnoses he claims to have had are contradictory and cannot be present in the same person. ➡️Arday also contradicted himself in discussing when he learned about his diagnosis. Sometimes he says he knew at age 3, but he also claimed to have not been told until his mid-30s. ➡️Arday didn't seem to understand what autism is. Sometimes he said it's a "hybrid" diagnosis, and at other times Arday said it was a type of other disabilities. Hhe even said it was "a kind of intellectual disability," which is absurdly wrong. This article exposes (and refutes) new lies from Arday that were previously unnoticed (or perhaps less publicized): ➡️Arday claimed to have been in a longitudinal study that does not exist. ➡️Arday said he attended a special needs school, but it is now documented fact that he attended the mainstream Heathbrook Primary School. ➡️New discrepancies in Arday's vita. It's a long read, but that's because Arday told a lot of lies, and Cartrarian is careful to document and debunk them. It's definitely worth reading. https://t.co/jZ7FHeGKS5
- Aug 21, 20263.1x their median
I've signed this letter in support of Nathan Cofnas. Whatever one thinks of Cofnas, academic whistleblowers should be protected from retaliation. Liberal-democratic rights are either universal or they are nothing. https://t.co/kIqkdQmPjh
- Sep 30, 20263.0x their median
Human rights lawyer @WolfgangKaleck represents the family of Patrice Lumumba, the first Congolese prime minister, who was assassinated in a U.S.- and Belgian-backed coup. “This is a story of the West preventing democratically elected leaders in the Global South from distributing the goods of their country to the peoples of the country,” says Kaleck.
- Sep 9, 2026
Now you see why they want a “FINRA for AI” model. It allows them to buy the regulator. Coefficient Giving, cofounded by Daniela Amodei’s husband (since left) and funded by Moskovitz (who invested in Anthropic), is spending hundreds of millions on ai safety orgs. Like Redwood. https://t.co/ZdooUpeCCX
- Aug 20, 2026
If you are a UK based Black academic/scholar and you are looking for a space to process, please let me know and I will DM you something.
- Sep 3, 2026
Allegations of bullying and misconduct raised against James Orr, Professor of Divinity at Cambridge University Allegations upheld, but resulted in no disciplinary action – even though the student was lied to and told that it had https://t.co/dylnnUoeLu
- Sep 23, 2026
This is mind blowing. OpenAI hacked private Australian Medicare files… and didn’t say a word about it to the government. Article in replies. https://t.co/y96aztFhIG
Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.
Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected
PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.
Reading these numbers
A typical post picks up 279 interactions against 122K followers, an engagement rate of 0.229%. Posts are seen about 34K times each, and 0.828% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 27.7% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 0.67 post a day over the last 30 days, though only 37% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 3 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 8.9K interactions, about 32x its own typical post. Only 3 original posts have been captured so far, fewer than the 8 posts we want behind a median before treating it as settled. Read the figures above as an early measurement of this account, not as a finished profile of it.
- What is Dr. Deepti Gurdasani's engagement rate on X?
- Dr. Deepti Gurdasani (@dgurdasani1) has an engagement rate of 0.229%, based on the median interactions across 3 original posts from the last 30 days against 121,626 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
- Is that a good engagement rate?
- At 0.229%, Dr. Deepti Gurdasani sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,261 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
- Does @dgurdasani1 have real engagement?
- There is not yet enough sample to rank this account against others of its size.
- When does @dgurdasani1 post?
- Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Wednesday is its busiest day, at roughly 0.67 posts per day across the measured window.