Back to @derek__olson's profile

Megalithic Marvels engagement report

@derek__olson - 97K followers on X

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026.

Engagement

Middle of its size range
Per follower
0.221%
of 97K followers
Per impression
4.59%
4.6K views on a typical post
Reach
4.82%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
213
interactions (median)
Saved
0.237%
11 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
2/day
active 43% of days
Peak time
18:00 UTC
Monday

A typical post picks up 213 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.221%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 4.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bundaawardsă…¤, #chudai18, #resonance.

Measured over 53 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on September 16, 2026. Recurring tags: #bundaawardsă…¤, #chudai18, #resonance.

Compared with accounts its own size

Megalithic Marvels's engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 7 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 84% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.221%, Megalithic Marvels sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the above the median band, which runs 0.143% to 0.678%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.678%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 205,048 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,894 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.678%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 18:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Monday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Monday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link2% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 2% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts.
  • Its average post runs 156 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Aug 7, 202618x their median

    This. Is. Granite. https://t.co/XaTGjGFJZl

    3.3K3221111274K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 202610x their median

    Cusco highlands https://t.co/q0eE12qn4D

    2.0K10327374K viewsView on X
  • Sep 9, 20268.0x their median

    These monumental polygonal towers are located in the remote highlands of southern Peru. Made of andesite, their entrances face east toward the rising sun. How old are they? Well, there are confirmed 8,000+ year old petroglyphs located a stones throw from them… Did I mention that mummies with elongated skulls were discovered inside?

    1.5K140461079K viewsView on X
  • Aug 12, 20267.7x their median

    Ancient engineering in Cusco https://t.co/9Gy3kguNIH

    1.5K13835648K viewsView on X
  • Aug 8, 20266.7x their median

    There’s nothing at all interesting about this wall in Cusco https://t.co/gEbJMwaE4P

    1.3K8736218K viewsView on X
  • Aug 16, 20266.5x their median

    Standing between two different civilizations at Pisac. One is superior, one inferior. The contrast between the megalithic engineering & later Inca construction is clear to see https://t.co/q5jwPdApKx

    1.2K12016729K viewsView on X
  • Aug 4, 20265.9x their median

    The dude who chiseled & hammered this one had xtra special skillz https://t.co/InI4fg0JxQ

    1.1K8846238K viewsView on X
  • Aug 5, 20265.2x their median

    This might be the best capture ever taken of Tikal’s temple V. Anyone still believe this was just made for ceremonial purposes? 📷 Baptiste Malval https://t.co/HSWvxc6xgY

    9886942421K viewsView on X
  • Aug 6, 20264.5x their median

    1889 photo of the Kukulkan pyramid at Chichen Itza https://t.co/qav78Qh1hZ

    8647510316K viewsView on X
  • Sep 6, 20264.0x their median

    Micro-drill holes on this block at Puma Punku… https://t.co/Ygg2ATNVkj

    7407823321K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Recurring topics

#bundaawardsă…¤#chudai18#resonance

The most frequent hashtags in the sampled posts. They describe what this account writes about; they are not a performance signal, and the catalog-wide breakdown on the hub shows how little hashtag count moves.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 213 interactions against 97K followers, an engagement rate of 0.221%. Measured over 53 original posts, its engagement rate beats 66% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size, which puts it in the middle of its size range rather than at either end. Posts are seen about 4.6K times each, and 4.59% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 4.77% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 2 posts a day over the last 30 days, though only 43% of days saw any activity at all. Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 53 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 3.8K interactions, about 18x its own typical post. Recurring topics include #bundaawardsă…¤, #chudai18, #resonance.

What is Megalithic Marvels's engagement rate on X?
Megalithic Marvels (@derek__olson) has an engagement rate of 0.221%, based on the median interactions across 53 original posts from the last 30 days against 97,368 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.221%, Megalithic Marvels sits above the 50th percentile of the 205,048 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @derek__olson have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 66% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the middle of its size range group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @derek__olson post?
Most posts go out around 18:00 UTC, and Monday is its busiest day, at roughly 2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going