Back to @dennis07081's profile

都幾耕 engagement report

@dennis07081 - 236K followers on X

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Engagement

Top 10% for its size
Per follower
0.9%
of 236K followers
Per impression
1.93%
98K views on a typical post
Reach
46.7%
of its followers see a post
Typical post
1.9K
interactions (median)
Saved
0.662%
650 bookmarks on a typical post
Posting rate
1.2/day
active 77% of days
Peak time
13:00 UTC
Thursday

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.9%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 41.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

Measured over 23 original posts from a 30-day window, last computed on October 10, 2026.

Compared with accounts its own size

都幾耕's engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts, accounts of similar size (decile 9 of 10)). A percentile is spread evenly by construction, so 50 really is the middle of that group and 90 really is its top tenth.

On engagement per impression rather than per follower it beats 61% of the same group. When those two numbers disagree, the gap is about how far its posts travel rather than how people react to them.

Where this sits in the catalog

At 0.9%, 都幾耕 sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. That places it in the top 25% band, which runs 0.677% to 2.55%.

p100.004%
p250.024%
p50 (median)0.143%
p750.677%
p902.55%
p9982.4%
Engagement rate as a share of followers, across the 204,583 accounts we have scanned enough to measure. The axis is logarithmic, because the top and bottom of this population are about 22,891 times apart and a linear axis would flatten everything below the median into a single point.
Show the percentile table
Engagement rate percentiles
PercentileEngagement rate
10th percentile0.004%
25th percentile0.024%
50th percentile0.143%
75th percentile0.677%
90th percentile2.55%
99th percentile82.4%

This ruler is the whole measured catalog, not a size-matched group: it shows where the raw rate falls across every account we can measure, all of which are large. For a like-for-like comparison, read the size-band percentile above instead. See how the bands are built

Posting timing

This account posts most often around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day of the week. The bars below are the catalog-wide pattern, with this account's own busiest slot marked. They do not show how this account performs at each hour: we keep one aggregate per account, not one per hour, so that measurement does not exist in our data.

Engagement by hour posted, UTCTwenty-four bars, one per UTC hour. Each bar shows how posts published in that hour compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC.
0003060912151821
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest hour: 13:00 UTC
Show engagement by hour posted, utc as a table
Engagement by hour posted, UTC
Hour (UTC)Vs author medianPosts
00:00 UTC-1%89K
01:00 UTC-2%90K
02:00 UTC-3%88K
03:00 UTC-4%94K
04:00 UTC-5%76K
05:00 UTC-4%75K
06:00 UTC-5%86K
07:00 UTC-5%93K
08:00 UTC-4%108K
09:00 UTC-4%124K
10:00 UTC-3%129K
11:00 UTC-3%141K
12:00 UTC-3%154K
13:00 UTC-3%167K
14:00 UTC-4%173K
15:00 UTC-2%176K
16:00 UTC-3%171K
17:00 UTC-3%159K
18:00 UTC-2%149K
19:00 UTC-2%141K
20:00 UTC-1%131K
21:00 UTC0%116K
22:00 UTC-2%100K
23:00 UTC-1%90K
Engagement by day of weekSeven bars, one per weekday, Sunday first. Each bar shows how posts published on that day compare with their own authors' median engagement. Bars above the centre line ran higher than the median, bars below ran lower. A marker flags Busiest day: Thursday.
SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
Above the authors' own mediansBelowScale: plus or minus 111%Busiest day: Thursday
Show engagement by day of week as a table
Engagement by day of week
DayVs author medianPosts
Sunday+5%393K
Monday+1%483K
Tuesday-2%520K
Wednesday-3%472K
Thursday-2%430K
Friday-3%447K
Saturday+2%393K
See what moves engagement across the whole catalogWhat counts as a good engagement rate at this size

Formats this account uses

Its own posting mix on the left, and what each of those formats does across every account we track on the right. Only formats where the effect clears our publish test appear here, so an empty row is a format we could not measure rather than one that does nothing.

This account's posting mix compared with catalog-wide effects
FormatThis accountCatalog effect95% intervalAccounts behind it
Image or video100% of posts+111%+108% to +115%34K
Outbound link70% of posts-41%-42% to -40%32K
Typical length--3%-3% to -2%54K
  • 100% of this account's sampled posts carry an image or video. Across the catalog, posts with an image or video run 111% above the same accounts' other posts.
  • 70% of its posts carry a link off X. Across the catalog, posts with an outbound link run 41% below the same accounts' other posts, so a large share of this account's output sits in the weakest bucket we measure.
  • Its average post runs 87 characters, which falls in the 80 - 180 characters band. Across the catalog, posts of 80 to 180 characters run 3% below the same accounts' other posts.

These are catalog-wide differences applied to this account's own posting mix, not a measurement of how each format performs for this account specifically. We keep one median per account, not one per format per account, so the second thing is not something this data can tell you.

Best tweets

  • Sep 15, 202610x their median

    來個好久沒拍的手槍系列,想看噴噴的完整版在這裡 https://t.co/IDxDDe7Oq4 https://t.co/lDtSjKD4Ds

    15K3.8K2710390K viewsView on X
  • Sep 7, 20267.8x their median

    雙重火車 @Cherrycandleph @penelopereedx https://t.co/W1EDLfuFAw

    14K78091260K viewsView on X
  • Sep 23, 20264.1x their median

    各位喜歡看我跟女生洗澡還是跟男生洗澡 @sky_happy0325 https://t.co/4aQP7V8SHV

    6.7K969491179K viewsView on X
  • Aug 31, 20264.0x their median

    很久沒給你們看我手速了 https://t.co/JbhB64QzEw

    6.5K1.1K113191K viewsView on X
  • Sep 29, 20263.0x their median

    這個視角很誇張 @Qmeowyuan00 https://t.co/lJg7QT0c8Y https://t.co/carch1KdXf

    5.2K48011172K viewsView on X
  • Sep 10, 20262.8x their median

    她來我家玩 @xoxox0i @ricebugi https://t.co/8lzZNrTCC4

    5.0K30741210K viewsView on X
  • Sep 1, 20262.8x their median

    小技巧 https://t.co/fzBuFs2KzA

    4.8K37142208K viewsView on X
  • Oct 2, 20262.7x their median

    太誇張了竟然遇到全新的日本素人,不看可惜! @oniaku_001 https://t.co/OeirsYHyG6 https://t.co/XOAJKQjNpJ

    4.8K363101115K viewsView on X
  • Sep 5, 20262.5x their median

    玩瘋了 @Gummypoppylove @CY_ching_yo https://t.co/dT5plHvftD

    4.2K42912208K viewsView on X
  • Oct 9, 20262.1x their median

    每次看到她的大長腿我都會硬爆,快來看完整版 @mio772 https://t.co/fFjfd8Sdo5 https://t.co/Xh3IqEfBRX

    3.7K1520073K viewsView on X

Ranked by total interactions across everything we have tracked for this account, which is a longer history than the 30-day window the rates above use. The multiple compares each post to this account's own median.

Buy or sell Twitter (X) accounts - escrow-protected

PlayerSells is an escrow marketplace for Twitter (X) accounts. Every deal is protected, with no middleman risk.

Reading these numbers

A typical post picks up 1.9K interactions against 236K followers, an engagement rate of 0.9%. Measured over 23 original posts, its engagement rate beats 92% of 20,444 tracked accounts of a similar size. Comparing inside a size band matters here: engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly just re-measure the follower count. Posts are seen about 98K times each, and 1.93% of those impressions turn into an interaction. That is about 41.5% of the follower count, which is the gap between an audience on paper and an audience in a timeline. Posting runs at about 1.2 post a day over the last 30 days, with activity on roughly 77% of days. Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is the busiest day of the week. Of the 23 posts sampled, 100% carry an image or video and 70% link out. The account's strongest tracked post pulled 19K interactions, about 10x its own typical post.

What is 都幾耕's engagement rate on X?
都幾耕 (@dennis07081) has an engagement rate of 0.9%, based on the median interactions across 23 original posts from the last 30 days against 236,274 followers. Replies, reposts and quote-posts of other people are excluded from that sample.
Is that a good engagement rate?
At 0.9%, 都幾耕 sits above the 75th percentile of the 204,583 accounts in this comparison. Those comparison accounts are all large ones, because our scanning cadence is weighted towards big accounts, so this is a ranking among peers of similar scale rather than a ranking across X.
Does @dennis07081 have real engagement?
Its engagement rate beats 92% of the tracked X accounts closest to it in follower count (20,444 accounts), which puts it in the top 10% for its size group. Ranking inside a size band matters because engagement rate falls as accounts grow, so a raw rate would mostly re-measure the follower count. It is a starting point for a look at follower quality, not a verdict on it.
When does @dennis07081 post?
Most posts go out around 13:00 UTC, and Thursday is its busiest day, at roughly 1.2 posts per day across the measured window.

Keep going